A three-hour debate turned into a masterclass in ego, semantics, and why bad arguments still make great content.

This week, we break down the explosive Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson showdown over Charlie Kirk’s assassination claims, the missing evidence, and the moment the whole thing spiraled into accusations, hearsay battles, and one of the most awkward fact-checks you’ll hear all year.

What starts as a messy internet spectacle quickly becomes a bigger conversation about how political debates are won, lost, and monetized.

We dig into why Candace’s combative style backfired, why Wilson’s “positive evidence” challenge landed, and why the exchange felt less like a real search for truth and more like a content machine feeding both sides.

Please remember to like this video, share it, and subscribe to the channel!

Follow the show everywhere: https://linkbio.co/spinstatepod

Follow us on Social Media:
Robert: https://link.me/realrobertherr

Ryan: https://x.com/ryanthomastalks, https://instagram.com/ryanthomastalks

Rowan: https://x.com/RowanMicheals

Subscribe to the UNSPUN Newsletter: https://unspun.beehiiv.com

Check out our new Merch Store: https://stickermule.com/spinstatepod

Eclipse Holsters (Use code ‘RyanThomas’ at checkout): https://eclipseholsters.com

Get a free 30-day trial to Beehiiv & 20% off your first 3 months: https://www.beehiiv.com/?via=spinstatepod

Join us on PickAx: https://pickax.com/?referralCode=suznlck&refSource=copy

Join the fight against ALPR’s with Deflock: https://deflock.org