『GREATER THAN CAN BE THOUGHT: ANSELM OF CANTERBURY AND THE MOST PERSISTENT PROOF OF GOD』のカバーアート

GREATER THAN CAN BE THOUGHT: ANSELM OF CANTERBURY AND THE MOST PERSISTENT PROOF OF GOD

 プレビューの再生
プレミアムプランに登録する プレミアムプランを無料で試す
期間限定：2026年10月19日(日本時間)に終了
2026年10月19日まで対象者限定でプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円キャンペーン開催中。詳細はこちら。
オーディオブック・ポッドキャスト・オリジナル作品など数十万以上の対象作品が聴き放題。
オーディオブックをお得な会員価格で購入できます。
会員登録は5か月目以降は月額¥1,500で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます。
オーディオブック・ポッドキャスト・オリジナル作品など数十万以上の対象作品が聴き放題。
オーディオブックをお得な会員価格で購入できます。
30日間の無料体験後は月額￥1500で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます。

GREATER THAN CAN BE THOUGHT: ANSELM OF CANTERBURY AND THE MOST PERSISTENT PROOF OF GOD

著者： Boris Kriger
ナレーター： Daniel Nathan Wallace
プレミアムプランを無料で試す プレミアムプランを無料で試す

30日間の無料体験後は月額￥1500で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます。

30日間の無料体験後は月額￥1500で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます。

￥1,800 で購入

￥1,800 で購入

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
This book tells the story of that argument and of the man who found it. Anselm of Canterbury was a runaway son from the Alps who became the most beloved teacher of his age, a monk dragged weeping to an archbishopric he did not want, an exile who stood against two kings of England, and the thinker who did something no theologian before him had dared: he stated, in a single phrase, exactly what he meant by the word God — that than which nothing greater can be thought — and then refused to move that definition by a single inch while he proved that what it names must exist.For nine centuries the proof has been declared dead. Gaunilo answered it within Anselm’s lifetime; Thomas Aquinas set it aside; Kant announced that existence is not a predicate; the logical positivists dismissed it as grammar gone wrong. And each time, the argument returned — in Descartes and Leibniz, in Hegel, in the modal reconstructions of Malcolm and Hartshorne, in a notebook of Kurt Gödel, in the possible-worlds logic of Alvin Plantinga. No other argument in the history of thought has been refuted so often and buried so shallowly.Boris Kriger argues that the reason is simple and has been hiding in plain sight: Anselm did what almost no one arguing about God has done before or since. He accepted formal responsibility for his words. He declared his definition before he began, and everything he claimed, he claimed strictly within it. The nine-hundred-year quarrel over the ontological argument, this book shows, has never really been a quarrel about the reasoning — the reasoning is sound. It is a quarrel about the definition: whether such a concept is admissible, what may be built into it, and what follows once it is granted. Read this way, the famous refutations change character. Kant did not break the proof; he disputed the definition.©2026 Boris Kriger (P)2026 Boris Kriger
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません