『2026 Blue Wave』のカバーアート

2026 Blue Wave

2026 Blue Wave

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る
概要
 This week we talk about the US midterm elections, the unusually broad Democratic victory, and what a change in congressional control means for the remainder of President Trump’s term. We also discuss the cost of living, the limits of a congressional majority, and what these results may, and may not, tell us about 2028.Recommended Book: 1873 by Liaquat AhamedTranscriptOn November 3rd, 2026, Americans voted in an election that, under ordinary circumstances, would have been expected to make governing a little more difficult for the sitting president. The party in the White House often loses seats in midterm elections, as voters register their frustrations and the coalition that elected the president proves more difficult to assemble without the president, the party’s figurehead, on the ballot.This time, though, the losses were substantial enough to change who controls both chambers of Congress. Democrats won the House of Representatives, and they won the Senate, picking up seats in states that would have seemed like especially difficult targets, perhaps even borderline impossible to win, not that long ago. They also won several governorships, including in until recently unlikely-seeming places, like Texas, Iowa, Ohio, and Georgia.The precise size of those majorities are still in flux as of the day I’m recording this, as the last close races are still being counted and have yet to be called. But the basic result is settled: when the new Congress takes office in January, President Donald Trump will be working with a Democratic House and a Democratic Senate after two years of enjoying a Congress run by his party, in addition to his spot at the top of the executive branch, and a Supreme Court stacked with loyalists and ideological fellow travelers.What I’d like to talk about today is how that happened, what it allows the Democrats to potentially do after they’re seated, and what it might mean for the next presidential election.—As I mentioned, at the start of this election cycle, Republicans held the presidency, the House, and the Senate. Their House majority was narrow, which made a Democratic takeover there plausible. The Senate, as is often the case for Democrats hoping to win it, looked like it would be a far heavier lift, to the point that it wasn’t really in play. Senators serve six-year terms, so only about a third of them face voters at any given midterm, and Democrats needed to win seats in places where Republicans had recently been quite strong, in some cases leaning toward the Republicans in the double-digits.But the Dems managed to win those seats, and then some. Democrats flipped Senate seats in North Carolina and Maine, but also in Kansas, Iowa, Texas, and South Carolina. In Ohio, Sherrod Brown returned to the Senate after losing his seat two years earlier. As I’m writing this, Democrats have secured at least 54 seats, with a couple of contests still unresolved, and 51 seats represents a majority in the Senate.That Kansas result is especially striking: the state hadn’t elected a Democrat to the US Senate in nearly a century. Texas hadn’t elected a Democrat to a statewide office in more than three decades, but voters there chose James Talarico for the Senate and Gina Hinojosa for governor in this election—both Democrats.The House results were widespread and numerous, too, with Democrats flipping more than two dozen Republican-held districts, according to the Associated Press. And across the country, some voters elected new Democratic governors even where the state legislatures will remain Republican. This matters because a governor can shape budgets, appointments, and the administration of state government, but generally can’t enact their whole agenda without the legislature.That said, for a sense of how unusual this is, the House and Senate have both changed hands during a midterm election only three other times since World War II: in 1946, 1994, and 2006. A president’s party losing ground halfway through a term is common. Losing enough ground to hand over both chambers, including one with the Senate’s electoral map and offset election cycle, is not.So let’s take a moment to consider why this happened, because election results, even unusual ones, tend to get appealingly simple explanations in the press and think pieces, but there are several different things going on here, all at once.One is the cost of living. In the Associated Press’s large survey of people who voted, those who were especially concerned about grocery bills, healthcare, gas, and other daily costs overwhelmingly favored Democratic House candidates. Many voters blamed Trump’s economic policies, including tariffs, for making prices worse. The war with Iran also pushed fuel costs higher, and was unpopular with many voters who had expected a different approach to foreign policy.None of which requires a recession or other dramatic economic state of affairs. People can have jobs and still feel that ...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません