004: Defining Chiropractic, Innate Law and Analysis: A Debate with Dr. Eddie Weller
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
004: Defining Chiropractic, Innate Law and Analysis: A Debate with Dr. Eddie Weller
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
"Chiropractic is what you say it is. Just ask any chiropractor." Is that a joke, or the profession's biggest problem?
Dr. Mark Romano and Dr. Eddie Weller return for a second conversation that quickly becomes a debate. They push each other on definitions, on the source of the innate law, and on whether chiropractic is a science that can be logically defended or something closer to a belief.
The conversation moves into analysis: advanced muscle palpation, instrumentation, pattern analysis, and the case for post-analysis as the only way to know an adjustment actually happened.
In this episode:
- Why the profession still can't agree on a definition, and why that matters
- Innate law as a principle versus a source to be named
- Advanced muscle palpation, instrumentation and pattern analysis compared
- Why diversified technique has no post-analysis, and what that means
- Principle 25: the character of innate forces
- What "successful" means for a congruent chiropractor
https://www.ntscinstitute.com/front-door.