『treehugger podcast』のカバーアート

treehugger podcast

treehugger podcast

著者: Michael T Yadrick
無料で聴く

今ならプレミアムプランが3カ月 月額99円

2026年5月12日まで。4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。

概要

The show where we reimagine ecological restoration and highlight the humans involved in assisting the recovery of ecosystems. Our efforts promise an equitable future for livelihoods and healthspans as well as a just transition in a warming world. 博物学 科学 自然・生態学
エピソード
  • Default Prescriptions with Timothy Pape & Sam Woodrich
    2026/04/16

    A couple years after our first conversation on artificial intelligence and ecological restoration, I sat back down with Timothy Pape and Sam Woodrich to ask: what's actually happening now? Their new research looks at how mainstream AI chatbots generate restoration plans across North American ecosystems. The results are familiar; almost too familiar. Plant native species. Remove invasive plants. Repeat. A longer show title might be - Default Prescriptions: AI, Ecology, and the Stories We Repeat.

    In this follow-up conversation, I reconnect with Timothy Pape and Sam Woodrich to explore what's changed—and what hasn't. Their recent study examines how AI chatbots generate restoration prescriptions across different ecosystems, and what emerges is a kind of pattern recognition loop: vegetation-first, context-light, and strikingly similar across places that should demand very different approaches.

    Woodrich, S. T., & Pape, T. (2024). Ecological restoration and artificial intelligence: Whose values inform a project? Restoration Ecology, 32(4), e14128. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14128

    We talk about why that happens, what it says about the knowledge systems AI is trained on, and how these tools may be reinforcing the dominant narratives already present in restoration ecology. Along the way, we get into:

    • why AI defaults to "plant natives and remove invasives"
    • the absence of social, cultural, and economic context in restoration plans
    • the limits of chatbots when it comes to asking deeper questions
    • how practitioners are actually using AI in the field (for better and worse)
    • the risk of "convincingly shallow" answers
    • and the paradox of using resource-intensive technology to plan ecological repair

    This episode sits at the intersection of ecology, technology, and values—and asks what happens when we let machines reflect our field back to us.

    Guests

    Timothy Pape
    Assistant Professor, Bowling Green State University
    Focus: ecological restoration, environmental studies, systems thinking

    Sam Woodrich
    PhD Candidate, Oregon State University
    Focus: predator ecology, riparian systems, restoration science

    Work With Me

    Interested in restoration strategy, climate adaptation, or ecological storytelling?
    Reach out through Madrone Grove Adaptation & Restoration - treehuggerpod@gmail.com

    Read more reflections: Grove & Grit (Substack)

    Music from this episode is from YouTube Audio Library: True Coockoo, Xander Jones, The Grey Room

    Listen to the treehugger lightning songs playlist

    続きを読む 一部表示
    50 分
  • Scapegoat with Clare Follmann
    2026/02/18

    In this episode, Michael talks with environmental writer Clare Follmann about her new book Scapegoat: What the Invasive Species Story Gets Wrong (AK Press) - and yes, we are talking about invasive species again, but this time with sharper teeth. Together they question the fantasy of eradication, unpack "plastic words" like management and health, and examine how invasive species rhetoric can distract from capitalism, climate disruption, and the systems actually reshaping our landscapes. From novel ecosystems to the ethics of killing in conservation, this conversation asks restoration practitioners to be more precise, more honest, and maybe a little less trigger-happy with the war metaphors. Because in a warming world, clarity matters - and not everything that spreads is the villain.

    Clare Follmann https://clarefollmann.com

    Scapegoat: What the Invasive Species Story Gets Wrong (AK Press):
    https://www.akpress.org/scapegoat.html

    Barred Owl Controversy (Referenced in Episode)

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Barred Owl Management Strategy:
    https://www.fws.gov/project/barred-owl-management

    To Kill or Not to Kill? The Controversial Plan to Kill Half a Million Barred Owls https://www.earthlawcenter.org/blog-entries/2024/12/to-kill-or-not-to-kill-the-controversial-plan-to-kill-half-a-million-barred-owls

    Grove & Grit Substack

    Treehugger is independently produced. If this episode moved you, challenged you, or sharpened your thinking, consider supporting the podcast:

    Venmo: @myadrick
    PayPal: paypal.me/myadrick
    CashApp: $michaelyadrickjr

    You can also support by sharing the episode, leaving a review, or sending it to someone who still says "combat invasive species" with a straight face.

    Intro/Outro Music by: Xander and The Grey Room

    続きを読む 一部表示
    43 分
  • grove & grit restoration brief on foraging & food sovereignty
    2026/02/12
    Let's explore foraging as a living, contested relationship between ecology, culture, law, and survival. Beginning with za'atar - a resilient wild thyme central to Palestinian foodways - we examine how conservation policy can criminalize cultural harvest. From there, we move briefly through international access models (UK personal-use law, Nordic everyman's rights, regulated European mushroom harvest), and closer to home: US National Parks, Washington State Parks, Seattle, and Tacoma. We unpack how language like management, stewardship, and resource protection can obscure power, and we ground the conversation in ecological restoration, justice, livelihoods, and human health. We also highlight examples of agencies attempting to align policy with principle and how there is a new story emerging that could signal change - if we demand it. Ultimately, the question remains: Who gets to eat from the land? Selected References & Policies Hernandez, J., & Vogt, K. A. (2020). Indigenizing Restoration: Indigenous Lands before Urban Parks. Human Biology, 92(1), 37–44. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol/vol92/iss1/5/ Society for Ecological Restoration. (2021). International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration (2nd ed.) https://www.ser.org/page/SERStandards United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html National Park Service. (2023). Tribal leaders guide for NPS plant gathering. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/upload/Tribal-Leaders-Guide-for-NPS-Plant-Gathering.pdf Washington State Legislature. (2008). WAC 352-28-030: Harvest of edibles. https://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=352-28-030 Seattle Parks & Recreation Rules & Regulations General park conduct and prohibited activities (including damage or removal of park property ➝ plants, trees, soil, etc.). https://www.seattle.gov/parks/about-us/rules-and-regulations Parks Tacoma Conduct in Parks City parks code regulating conduct on Tacoma park land including damage or removal of plants, shrubs, trees, etc. https://www.parkstacoma.gov/places/conduct-in-our-parks/ Support the Work Full show notes and additional essays live on the Grove & Grit Substack https://substack.com/@grovegrit If this episode resonated, you can support treehugger podcast through the donation links in the show notes. Your contributions help cover research, editing, hosting, and independent production. Venmo: @myadrick | PayPal: paypal.me/myadrick | CashApp: $michaelyadrickjr Ratings and reviews also help more people find the show. Music Intro/outro music by MK2 and Grey Room, courtesy of the YouTube Audio Library
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
まだレビューはありません