『ellisconversations's podcast』のカバーアート

ellisconversations's podcast

ellisconversations's podcast

著者: Jamil Ellis and Ronald Ellis
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

In this podcast, Jamil Ellis talks with his father, retired Federal Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis, about the historical role of law in shaping the societal structures which act as barriers to attaining the American dream. They discuss why "legal" is not a synonym for "moral" and why law, a prime actor in creating the problems, can and should be a part of the solution. Join them as they talk about wealth, voting, education, criminal justice and other topics which divide the nation. https://ellisconversations.tumblr.com/ 政治・政府 政治学 社会科学
エピソード
  • Loving Day, The Warren Court, The rights they want to erase
    2025/06/12

    In this episode of Ellis Conversations, co-host Jamil Ellis sits down again with his father, retired federal magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis, to mark Loving Day — the anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 Supreme Court case that struck down bans on interracial marriage.

    What starts as a reflection on Loving Day quickly becomes a powerful and wide-ranging discussion about:

    • How distorted historical narratives fuel today's rollback of civil rights
    • Why anti-DEI forces rely on historical erasure
    • The forgotten legal barriers against women
    • The dangerous nostalgia embedded in the "Make America Great Again" slogan
    • A look at Project 2025, the Federalist Society, and how today's Supreme Court is targeting many of the Warren Court's civil rights decisions

    From All in the Family to Sidney Poitier, from welfare state debates to voting rights, Judge Ellis breaks down the legal and cultural legacy at stake.

    Relevant Links & Resources:
    • Loving v. Virginia (1967)
      https://www.oyez.org/cases/1966/395

    • Warren Court Key Decisions
      Brown v. Board (1954): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/347us483
      Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1962/155
      Miranda v. Arizona (1966): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/759
      Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496
      Engel v. Vitale (1962): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1961/468
      Tinker v. Des Moines (1969): https://www.oyez.org/cases/1968/21

    • Project 2025: https://www.project2025.org

    • Federalist Society: https://fedsoc.org

    • All In The Family theme reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_in_the_Family

    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • Deliberate, But No Speed: How Supreme Court rulings have allowed public schools to remain segregated seventy years after Brown v. Board.
    2025/05/30

    The hosts discuss how desegregation under Brown was hampered in schools by a policy of "all deliberate speed" where the speed was often zero. In contrast, and despite the fact that in large portions of the nation education is separate and unequal, the Trump administration has begun an "all speed ahead" policy of eliminating decrees which contained desegregation requirements'.

    https://www.axios.com/2025/05/02/doj-decades-old-school-desegregation-louisiana

    In this episode of Ellis Conversations, co-host Jamil Ellis and his father, retired federal magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis, reflect on the 71st anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education—not just the 1954 decision, but its overlooked 1955 follow-up. They explore the legal and societal impacts of desegregation mandates, the resistance that followed, and how today's rollback of civil rights enforcement—particularly around school desegregation—echoes familiar patterns.

    With real-life stories, including Ruby Bridges and Prince Edward County's school closures, the conversation traces decades of policy evolution—from Milliken v. Bradley to Roberts Court rulings that undermine systemic remedies for segregation. The episode also offers generational perspectives on optimism, protest, and the need for youth leadership in safeguarding educational equity.

    👉 If you're concerned about the dismantling of civil rights protections in education and policing—or wondering how to equip young people to carry the legacy forward—this one's for you.

    🔗 Relevant Links & References:
    • Brown v. Board of Education (1954 & 1955 decisions)
      https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/347us483
      https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/349us294

    • Milliken v. Bradley (1974)
      https://www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-434

    • Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)
      https://www.oyez.org/cases/2006/05-908

    • Ruby Bridges Foundation
      https://rubybridges.foundation

    • Shelby County v. Holder (2013 Voting Rights Act decision)
      https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96

    • American Psychological Association – Implicit Bias
      https://www.apa.org/ed/university/implicit-bias

    • The Heritage Foundation's "Project 2025" (mentioned indirectly)
      https://www.project2025.org

    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • The Company Trump Keeps: From David Duke to The Proud Boys to Project 2025 – Intended Consequences
    2024/07/11

    In this episode, the hosts discuss Project 2025 and its potential impact in a Donald Trump administration.

    Heritage Foundation and Trump https://www.heritage.org/impact/trump-administration-embraces-heritage-foundation-policy-recommendations Biden's Judicial Appointments https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/12/04/most-of-bidens-appointed-judges-to-date-are-women-racial-or-ethnic-minorities-a-first-for-any-president/ Trump bankruptcies https://bankruptcy-toledo.com/fact-checking-donald-trump-has-filed-bankruptcy-six-times/ The Nation on the Heirtage Foundation Project 2025 https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/will-the-heritage-foundations-project-2025-turn-trumpism-into-a-governing-agenda/ Trump Administration people at Heritage https://www.heritage.org/impact/four-trump-cabinet-members-now-call-heritage-home Trump on baby Tiffany's body. https://youtu.be/nqVgmwkX7oA Platforms Republican 2016 platform - https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2016-republican-party-platform Democrat 2020 platform - https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2020-democratic-party-platform Related episodes Voting is a Fundamental Right: Exercise It; You'll Make It Stronger The Hands That Rock The Cradle: Donald Trump, the Supreme Court, and the Federalist Society.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
まだレビューはありません