Why Scientists Can’t Get Rid of PFAS Easily
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
In this episode, we tackle a frustrating but important question: If PFAS are dangerous, why can’t scientists just get rid of them? PFAS, a type of PFAS known as “forever chemicals,” were engineered to resist heat, water, and oil. At the core of the problem is chemistry. The carbon–fluorine bond that makes PFAS so useful is also one of the strongest chemical bonds on Earth. These compounds do not break down naturally. They do not rot, dissolve, or disappear. They persist in soil, water, wildlife, and the human body.
We explore why modern water treatment systems struggle to remove PFAS. Most facilities were built before these chemicals were widely understood. Standard filtration and chlorination do not destroy them. Burning them requires extremely high temperatures and can release toxic byproducts if done improperly. To make matters more complex, PFAS are not just one chemical but thousands of related compounds. Even replacement “short-chain” PFAS, marketed as safer, remain persistent in the environment and can spread more easily through water systems.
Scientists are testing solutions like activated carbon filtration, ion exchange systems, plasma treatment, and electrochemical destruction. While some methods show promise, scaling them safely and affordably remains a challenge. Cleanup is slow and costly, and not all communities receive equal protection. The deeper truth is that PFOS were never designed to be removed. Prevention, regulation, and stopping non-essential uses may be the most realistic path forward. The problem may be long-lasting, but informed action and stronger oversight can shape what happens next.
In the next episode, we explore how PFAS became so widespread without public awareness and why stronger transparency matters.