Why Pre-Employment Tests Can Predict Performance

カートのアイテムが多すぎます

ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。

カートに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました

ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました

Why Pre-Employment Tests Can Predict Performance

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

Episode 32 of Hiring & Firing with Fexingo dives into the science behind pre-employment assessments. Lucas and Luna examine a 2025 meta-analysis of 250 studies showing that well-designed work sample tests predict job performance three times better than unstructured interviews. They break down why typical hiring tests fail—like personality inventories that explain less than 5% of variance—and what actually works: job-specific simulations, structured problem-solving tasks, and situational judgment tests. The hosts explore real-world examples from a Fortune 500 retailer that reduced turnover by 30% using a cashier simulation, and a tech startup that cut mis-hires by half with a 15-minute coding challenge. They also discuss the legal pitfalls of tests that inadvertently screen out protected groups, and how to validate assessments for fairness. By the end, listeners learn one actionable takeaway: if you're not using a validated work sample test, your hiring process is likely leaving good candidates on the table. Tune in for a practical, evidence-based look at what actually predicts job performance. #PreEmploymentTests #HiringScience #WorkSampleTests #JobPerformance #UnstructuredInterviews #PersonalityTests #SituationalJudgmentTests #CodingChallenges #RetailHiring #TurnoverReduction #Mishires #Validation #AdverseImpact #MetaAnalysis #Business #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #HiringAndFiring Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

まだレビューはありません