Why Do So Many Top Mutual Funds Own the Exact Same Companies?
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
- The Diversification Illusion: Why owning 5–6 mutual funds doesn’t automatically mean you’re diversified—and how overlapping holdings can create a portfolio that’s concentrated in the same sectors and the same handful of stocks.
- The “Top Funds Own the Same Stuff” Problem: Steve and Elizabeth explain how today’s “Top 50” fund lists can look nearly identical—driven by the market dominance of mega-cap companies and managers who fear being the one who didn’t own the winners.
- Duplication vs. Diversification: The hidden risk of owning the same company 5, 6, or even 10+ times across different funds—and why that can be expensive (and painful) when a single sector gets hit.
- Closet Indexing Exposed: What “closet indexing” really means—funds that closely track a benchmark while charging higher, active-management-style fees—so investors pay more for “the same ride.”
- The Fee Stack Nobody Explains: How advisory fees, fund expense ratios, trading costs, and internal fund costs can quietly compound—potentially draining long-term performance and reducing total returns over a 20–30 year retirement. Should You Just Buy the Stocks Directly?: Why direct stock ownership can reduce internal fund expenses—but also increases emotional decision-making risk (panic selling, chasing headlines), especially when large-cap stocks swing hard.
- What a Real Retirement Advisor Adds: The Hollands outline what actually matters beyond stock picking: exposure analysis, fee efficiency, behavioral coaching, and retirement-income risk alignment—plus integrating tax planning into the full retirement strategy.
まだレビューはありません