Why Criminalizing Homelessness Fails - Do You Know What Works Instead? S:2 E:22
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
A small-town plane crash set the scene—sudden chaos, blocked roads, everyone scrambling for a way around. That’s how many cities handle homelessness: move it along, push it out of sight, and call it a solution. We take a hard look at the Grants Pass v. Johnson ruling that lets cities ticket people for sleeping in public, and we ask what happens when poverty is treated as a crime rather than a policy failure.
We break down what “homeless” actually means, from tents and car camping to RV life without hookups, and why those distinctions matter for law, services, and dignity. Then we get into the gritty details: shelter rules that shut people out, curfews that clash with job hunts, pet bans that force impossible choices, and time limits that keep folks in churn. We talk camp sweeps that bulldoze IDs, meds, and bikes—the very tools needed to stabilize. We call out hostile design—bench dividers, spikes, boulders—and camping bans that criminalize rest. Alongside the stories are the stakes: cities spend millions enforcing visibility fixes that don’t reduce homelessness, while affordable housing proposals get blocked by NIMBY fears about property values and crime.
We also trace where donations do and don’t go, urging support for local groups—VFW halls, mutual aid networks, church funds—that get cash and goods directly to people without bloated overhead. At the core is a choice between comfort and conscience: if we can’t stand to see tents, we should demand the homes that make them unnecessary.
Join us as we trade myths for evidence, frustration for action, and stigma for straight talk. If this moved you, follow the show, share it with a friend, and leave a review with one idea your city should try next. Your voice helps push real solutions forward.
email: boomerandgenxer@gmail.com