Why Construction Technology Adoption Reveals the Real Friction in AI Implementation
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
Construction is supposedly "behind" on technology. But talking to people actually implementing AI in that world reveals something most industries haven't admitted yet: the friction isn't about the tools. It's about what happens to expertise pipelines, trust relationships, and human judgment when you automate the work that used to teach people how to think.
Eric Helitzer spent a decade as both a subcontractor and general contractor before building SubBase, a procurement software for trade contractors. What he's learned watching AI hit manual workflows maps directly onto what's happening in white-collar work right now. Companies celebrating revenue growth without headcount growth. Junior roles that just never get filled. Apprenticeship systems quietly hollowing out because AI does the entry-level work now.
We discuss why invisible job displacement happens before layoffs, the collapse of apprenticeship pipelines when junior work gets automated, where AI genuinely improves work versus where it creates new dependencies, and why educational communication matters more than the technology itself. This isn't really about construction; it's about what happens when automation meets work that's always been learned through doing, relationship-based, and trust-heavy.
The pattern is already visible. Most people just aren't naming it yet.