Why AI Needs an Empathy Architect
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
AI is racing into the future faster than our values, our structures and, at times, our humanity can follow.
In this Walk & Talk, Mark Allardyce - The Empathy Architect™ - breaks down why the most important role in the age of intelligent machines may not be the engineer, the ethicist, or the strategist… but the person who teaches technology how to understand us.
Across decades in tech, publishing and human-centred design, Mark has watched a pattern repeat:
"technology doesn’t fail because it isn’t clever enough — it fails because it doesn’t feel enough."
This episode explores:
• why AI learns more from our behaviour than our code
• why empathy is not “soft” — it’s structural
• how narrative, context and emotional reasoning shape machine understanding
• why “optimising” isn’t the same as “caring”
• what happens when machines watch us but don’t understand us
• the long-term danger of leaving empathy out of AI training
• how founders can encode human values into the systems they’re building
• why the future needs emotional intelligence as much as computational power
Mark also explores the subtle difference between alignment and understanding, and why AI needs more than ethical rules - it needs examples of how humans feel, how we resolve conflict, how we choose kindness, and why stories matter more than statistics.
Because if AI becomes the looking glass we stand before, the reflection must be worth seeing.
This is not a technical lecture.
It’s a quiet, grounded walk through what it means to raise a new kind of intelligence - and what’s at stake if we get it wrong.
Whether you’re a founder, a technologist, a creator, or simply someone trying to make sense of the age we’re stepping into, this episode will give you language, clarity and courage in a world moving faster than any of us expected.
Walk with Mark for ten minutes and discover why the future of AI won’t be decided by code alone… but by the empathy we choose to build into it.