『WAR 1870–1949: How Empires Rise and Fall』のカバーアート

WAR 1870–1949: How Empires Rise and Fall

WAR 1870–1949: How Empires Rise and Fall

著者: Nik Osterman
無料で聴く

概要

WAR 1870–1949: How Empires Rise and Fall

This is a story about why war happens when nobody truly wants it—until suddenly, everyone does.

If you grew up with the usual explanation, you were told the First World War begins with a gunshot in Sarajevo. A young man steps forward, fires two rounds, and the world falls apart. It’s neat. It’s cinematic. It has a villain, a victim, a turning point, and a date you can underline. It also has the comforting illusion that history is a line of dominoes and that one pushed the rest.

But the truth is crueler and more human.

Sarajevo was not the beginning. Sarajevo was a match. The question is why the room was full of powder.

This season is about the powder.

Nik Osterman
社会科学
エピソード
  • The Crown Falls-The Republic Bleeds.
    2026/02/05

    Hello and welcome back. This is WAR 1870–1949: How Empires Rise and Fall. Episode Two of our buildup arc is Germany: The Crown Falls, the Republic Bleeds.

    The most dangerous moment in a collapsing empire is not the day it loses. It’s the day it loses and then must decide what the loss means. Because meaning is power. Meaning determines who is blamed, who is trusted, who is allowed to rule, and what violence is permitted in the name of restoration.

    Germany in late 1918 is not simply defeated. It is unmade.

    The Kaiser is gone. Wilhelm II falls out of history like a crown tossed into cold water. The monarchy that once felt like the natural shape of Germany suddenly looks like a costume that has been ripped off in public. And the country does not experience that as a calm transition. It experiences it as a shock. A nation that has lived inside imperial certainty is suddenly handed the unfamiliar problem of being responsible for itself.

    The war ends, and immediately the war continues inside Germany.

    The soldiers come home, but they don’t come home into gratitude and stability. They come home into hunger, inflation, unemployment, resentment, street violence, and a sense of moral vertigo. They come home to a political argument that is not polite, because the argument is fueled by grief and humiliation and fear. The argument is this: did we lose because we were beaten, or did we lose because we were betrayed?

    続きを読む 一部表示
    9 分
  • 1918–1919: The Peace That Continued the War
    2026/02/04

    Hello and welcome back. This is WAR 1870–1949: How Empires Rise and Fall. Episode One of our buildup arc is 1918–1919: The Peace That Continued the War.

    The first thing to understand about the armistice is that it doesn’t feel like victory in the bodies of the people who survived. It feels like the gun finally stopping after you’ve lived so long with noise that silence itself is suspicious. The world in late 1918 is not a relieved world. It’s a stunned world. A world of men trying to walk on legs that aren’t there. A world of women who have learned to dread the sound of footsteps at the door. A world where influenza moves through weakened populations like a second army. A world of ration books, debt, and cemeteries that become permanent architecture.

    So when leaders speak of “peace,” they are already lying a little—not out of malice, but because the word is too clean for what exists. What exists is exhaustion. What exists is grief. What exists is fear that the whole structure of society might go down if pressure isn’t released quickly.

    And then the leaders gather to write the future.

    They arrive in Paris and they arrive with ghosts behind them. Not poetic ghosts—actual ghosts, in the form of the dead who now sit in every voter’s memory. Every government comes with an invisible crowd standing behind it: widows, parents, the wounded, men who survived and cannot sleep. That crowd is not interested in nuance. That crowd wants the suffering to mean something. That crowd wants the war to be justified after the fact. And this is one of the most dangerous forces in history: the demand that unbearable pain must be explained by a morally satisfying outcome.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • The Age of Attrition 1918 — The Armistice and the Peace That Wasn’t Peace
    2026/01/28

    1918 — The Armistice and the Peace That Wasn’t Peace

    By the time the guns stopped, the war had already done its deepest work. Not only on borders, but on minds. What ended in November 1918 was the shooting. What did not end was the pressure that produced the shooting in the first place. That pressure simply changed form. It moved into treaties, reparations, revolutions, resentments, and the private aftermath carried by millions of damaged people who returned home to countries that no longer felt like the countries they had left.

    In the autumn of 1918, Germany was collapsing from the inside outward. The Allied advances of the Hundred Days had pushed German forces back toward the Hindenburg Line and beyond. In a purely military sense, the German army was still capable of fighting in places, still capable of inflicting heavy losses, still capable of retreating in order rather than in total rout. But something more important had failed: belief. The soldiers knew the war was lost. The leadership knew it too. And the civilian population—hungry, exhausted, angry—could no longer carry the burden.

    Germany’s allies were falling away at the same time. Bulgaria sought an armistice in late September. The Ottoman Empire followed at the end of October. Austria-Hungary, internally fractured and militarily weakened, was breaking into national components. When these pillars collapsed, Germany’s strategic position became hopeless. The war that had begun as a contest of alliances ended with one side watching its coalition dissolve.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
まだレビューはありません