『Unobtainium Podcast』のカバーアート

Unobtainium Podcast

Unobtainium Podcast

著者： Adam Sigel & Dr. Amy Mainzer
無料で聴く

The Unobtainium Podcast is hosted by Adam Sigel, a Hollywood writer-producer, and Dr. Amy Mainzer, an astrophysicist. Together, they explore the science in science fiction. Each episode unpacks the Unobtainium behind movies—what’s real, what’s cinematic, and why filmmakers bend reality. This is for the nerds, sci-fi fans, film junkies, and anyone curious about the science behind the story.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

2026 Cognito Entertainment. All rights reserved. SF アート 科学
エピソード
  • Why We Deny Scientific Warnings? A Deep Dive into the Science of Climate Change, Searching for Hope, and the Art of Integrating Science into Emotional and Evocative Storytelling

    Why We Deny Scientific Warnings? A Deep Dive into the Science of Climate Change, Searching for Hope, and the Art of Integrating Science into Emotional and Evocative Storytelling
    2026/08/11
    Episode DescriptionWhat begins as a discussion of climate change expands into a deep dive into the science as well as the misinformation, political inertia, corruption and the psychology behind why societies struggle to respond to existential threats—even when the evidence is clear.McKay discusses the real-world inspiration for the film, Leonardo DiCaprio's performance, and why science and storytelling must work together if humanity hopes to solve its greatest challenges. Full SummaryThe Holocene Epoch & The Greenhouse EffectHost Dr. Amy Mainzer (UCLA astrophysicist) and director Adam McKay open with a discussion on the fundamental stability of Earth's climate over the past 12,000 years (the Holocene epoch). This stable climate enabled the rise of organized human agriculture.The Physics of Greenhouse Gases: Amy emphasizes that climate change physics is rooted in standard quantum mechanics. Molecules of greenhouse gases like CO2 absorb specific infrared light wavelengths emitted by the Earth, increasing molecular motion which manifests as trapped thermal energy.Earth Energy Imbalance (EEI): McKay highlights the extreme rate of trapped energy entering the biosphere—equivalent to the energy of roughly 12 Hiroshima bombs per second—moving the global climate past normal seasonal variations at an unprecedented pace.Science vs. Political Inaction & Media GaslightingMcKay shares his experiences speaking with scientists, politicians, and media professionals. Despite unequivocal empirical data, political structures and profit-driven media ecosystems frequently downplay or miscommunicate existential threats.Scientific Communication Dilemma: Scientists often struggle to convey urgent warnings without being labeled as alarmist or shut out of public discourse.Evolutionary Blindspots: Humans are evolutionarily hardwired to react to immediate, visible threats (e.g., an approaching predator) rather than invisible or complex systemic crises (e.g., viruses, greenhouse gas accumulation, or distant space objects).Behind the Scenes: The Leonardo DiCaprio "Network" SpeechThe hosts discuss the key scene where Dr. Randall Mindy (played by Leonardo DiCaprio) breaks down on live television.Tension Between Data and Incentives: DiCaprio advocated for a dramatic, classic "network speech" to capture a scientist's raw emotion when empirical data clashes with corporate greed, political complacency, and media circus tactics.Loyalty to Science: The narrative underscores that while individual scientists have human flaws, the scientific process itself relies on peer review and observed reality, standing firm against corporate gaslighting.Oligarchs, Geoengineering, and the "Nugget of Hope"Interference in Deflection Missions: In Don't Look Up, humanity's initial, viable plan to divert the comet using space shuttles is subverted by a billionaire tech mogul seeking to mine the object for valuable minerals, which mirrors real world influence by powerful billionaires on the public.The Power of Science: Despite the film's apocalyptic climax, Amy and McKay identify a core message of persistence: scientific solutions exist to mitigate existential threats, provided public interest and rigorous peer review take precedence over short-term financial interests.Follow Unobtainium Podcast! Website: unobtainiumpodcast.comWatch full episodes on https://www.youtube.com/@unobtainiumpod Stay connected: Instagram: @unobtainiumpod TikTok: @unobtainiumpod Bluesky: @unobtainiumpod.bsky.social X: @unobtainiumpod For Adam McKay:https://www.instagram.com/mr.ghostpanther/ www.yellowdotstudios.com #DontLookUp #AdamMcKay # LeonardoDiCaprio #NASA #ClimateChange #physics #AmyMainzer #unobtainiumpodcast #MovieBreakdown #SciFiMovies #GreenhouseEffect Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    35 分
  • What’s our plan for a planet-killer comet? The facts about NASA’s Planetary Defense (Kinetic Impactors vs Armageddon Nukes) and more in Adam McKay’s film "Don’t Look Up."

    What’s our plan for a planet-killer comet? The facts about NASA’s Planetary Defense (Kinetic Impactors vs Armageddon Nukes) and more in Adam McKay’s film "Don’t Look Up."
    2026/08/04
    Episode DescriptionHow do long-period comets (like Comet NEOWISE) actually move, how NASA’s real-life Planetary Defense Coordination Office operates, and whether kinetic impactors (like the DART mission) or nuclear explosives could divert a planet-killing object? They also dive into why the film serves as a sharp allegory for climate change, pandemic responses, corporate greed, and the politicization of science. Full SummaryAmy Mainzer (UCLA astrophysicist and science advisor on Don't Look Up) and Adam Sigel (Hollywood writer/producer) welcome writer/director Adam McKay to discuss balancing scientific accuracy with storytelling, and why making Don't Look Up required close collaboration between filmmakers and scientists. In reality, detecting and diverting a long-period comet would take roughly five years (and likely longer) to save humanity from the impact. This is the time needed for design reviews, international management, and spacecraft development. However, cinematic pacing demanded a condensed, high-stakes timeline.Asteroids, Comets and NASA's Planetary DefenseOrbital Mechanics: To fit the film's timeline realistically, Dr. Mainzer modeled the fictional threat after long-period comets coming from the outer solar system (similar to Comet NEOWISE, discovered in 2020). These objects approach the Sun rapidly on their first appearance, limiting advance warning.NASA’s Real Planetary Defense: The film’s "Oglethorpe" character reflects NASA’s actual Planetary Defense Coordination Office, which coordinates with international space agencies and emergency response networks (like FEMA) to track potential threats and plan mitigation strategies.Kinetic Impactors (The DART Mission): Kinetic redirection—knocking an object off-course by crashing a spacecraft into it. NASA successfully demonstrated this with the DART (Double Asteroid Redirection Test) mission, altering an asteroid’s orbital speed. However, kinetic impactors require years of lead time to successfully nudge an object away from Earth.Fictional Solutions vs. Geoengineering RisksIn Don't Look Up, the government abandons kinetic deflection to attempt a dangerous mining operation using "micro-targeted quantum fission explosives" and autonomous drones.Nuclear Explosions & Shotgun Blasts: Attempting to blow up a comet near Earth risks turning a single large impactor into a cluster of radioactive fragments.Parallels to Geoengineering: This reckless high-tech fix mirrors real-world geoengineering proposals (like solar radiation management via atmospheric particle injection to alter planetary albedo). Such unproven, large-scale intervention carries immense systemic risk and unpredictable consequences as the film bares out.Allegory, Corruption, and Human BehaviorPoliticization & Incentives: The conversation addresses how scientific consensus gets derailed by political interests, corporate lobbying, and social media manipulation. McKay highlights how careerism and financial incentives blind political and media classes to existential threats.Hyperbolic Discounting: The economic concept of humanity's tendency to prioritize immediate, short-term rewards while ignoring long-term risks.The Role of Art: They conclude that while science delivers inconvenient truths, art and satire provide the necessary emotional outlets for society to process existential dread and translate fear into systemic action. Follow Unobtainium Podcast! Website: unobtainiumpodcast.comWatch full episodes on https://www.youtube.com/@unobtainiumpod Stay connected: Instagram: @unobtainiumpod TikTok: @unobtainiumpod Bluesky: @unobtainiumpod.bsky.social X: @unobtainiumpod For Adam McKay:https://www.instagram.com/mr.ghostpanther/yellowdotstudios.com #DontLookUp #AdamMcKay #NASA #DARTMission #NeowiseComet #PlanetaryDefense #PlanetaryScience #unobtainiumpodcast #MovieBreakdown #SciFiMovies #KineticImpactor #AsteroidDeflection25 for 25 by Kjartan Abel. by kjartan_abel -- https://freesound.org/s/768490/ -- License: Attribution 4.0 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
  • How Real is the Science in Star Trek? Amy and Adam Talk Terraforming, Genetic Engineering, and Trekkie Love for the Wrath of Khan

    How Real is the Science in Star Trek? Amy and Adam Talk Terraforming, Genetic Engineering, and Trekkie Love for the Wrath of Khan
    2026/07/28
    Episode DescriptionIn this episode of The Unobtainium Podcast, Amy shows her true Trekkie colors as she and Adam unpack the science and themes of the beloved TOS cast film Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Together, they explore the ethical dilemmas of genetic engineering, eugenics, and CRISPR, along with the real-world science behind planet and star formation and the possibilities of terraforming dead planets. They also discuss why Khan Noonien Singh remains one of the franchise's best villains.Whether you're a lifelong Trekkie, a casual science fiction fan, or simply curious about the real science behind classic movies, this episode separates science fact from science fiction while celebrating one of the most beloved films in the Star Trek Universe.Full SummaryHosts Amy Mainzer (UCLA astrophysicist) and Adam Sigel (Hollywood writer/producer) discuss Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and why it remains the definitive TOS cast Star Trek movie. Released in 1982, the film marked a major cinematic evolution for the franchise, transitioning from 1960s TV camp to a high-stakes, narrative-driven space opera tackling mature themes like aging, mortality, and transformation.Genetic Engineering & Khan’s Origins· Eugenics and CRISPR: The villain Khan Noonien Singh (played by Ricardo Montalbán) is a genetically engineered "superman" from 20th-century Earth. Designed to be ten times stronger and smarter than average humans, Khan and his followers eventually became dictators during the Eugenics Wars.· Ethical Dilemmas: The hosts connect Khan’s backstory to modern genetic tools like CRISPR and selective breeding. The narrative raises the ethical question: Does superior physical or mental capacity give individuals the moral authority to rule over others?The "Genesis Device" vs. Real AstrophysicsThe conversation then turns to the film's legendary Genesis Device, examining whether terraforming could ever become reality. In the film, Project Genesis offers a technology capable of reorganizing subatomic matter that can instantly turn a dead moon into a living planet.· The "Proto-Matter" Fallacy: Amy notes that the movie's underlying concept of "proto-matter" matrix reorganization is entirely fictional.· Real Solar System Formation: In reality, planets do form from nebulae (clouds of gas and dust). Over millions of years, gravity pulls the cloud inward while rotational forces flatten it into a protoplanetary disk, eventually forming stars and planets. The Genesis Device essentially accelerates a process taking millions of years down to a few minutes.· Terraforming Reality: Real-world terraforming remains in its infancy. Current space exploration focuses on in-situ resource utilization (e.g., harvesting water ice on the Moon or Mars) rather than atmosphere-altering planetary engineering.Key Themes Beyond the Science· Creation vs. Destruction: The core narrative warning of Project Genesis is its potential as a weapon. If deployed where life already exists, it would destroy existing structures to create its new matrix. This serves as a metaphor for dual-use technologies like AI or nuclear energy.· Emotions vs. Pure Logic: Throughout the film, the emotional bonds between Captain Kirk, Spock, and Dr. McCoy emphasize that human intuition and empathy often overcome pure cold logic—a central theme that defines the heart of Star Trek. Follow Unobtainium Podcast! Website: unobtainiumpodcast.comWatch full episodes on https://www.youtube.com/@unobtainiumpod Stay connected: Instagram: @unobtainiumpod TikTok: @unobtainiumpod Bluesky: @unobtainiumpod.bsky.social X: @unobtainiumpod#startrek #trekkie #GeneticEngineering #Terraforming #unobtainiumpodcast #MovieBreakdown #SciFiMovies #StarTrek2WrathofKhan #GenesisDevice #PlanetFormation #AmyMainzer Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    40 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません