• Understanding The Adelson's: Roots, Culture & Control
    2025/09/04
    Understanding The Adelson's: Roots, Culture & Control
    Families that look “close” on the outside can actually be suffocating on the inside. In this segment, Tony Brueski is joined by psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott, along with Stacy and Todd, to unpack the roots of enmeshed families—the kind where loyalty becomes control.

    We dig into cultural influences, from Jewish and Asian traditions that normalize family loyalty, to the rise of helicopter parenting. We explore how narcissistic parents turn children into extensions of themselves, expecting achievements to reflect back on them rather than fostering independence.

    Shavaun explains the family continuum: disengaged (hands-off), balanced (healthy independence), and enmeshed (over-involved). Where does a family like the Adelsons fit? They raised high-achieving children, but at what cost? Their careers soared, but their moral compasses cracked.

    This conversation looks at how enmeshment breeds anxiety, depression, and adult children who struggle with identity and boundaries. We also ask: Is there ever such a thing as a “good” enmeshed family, or is it always toxic in the long run?

    Hashtags:
    #AdelsonTrial #EnmeshedFamilies #ShavaunScott #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FamilyPsychology #DanMarkel #DonnaAdelson #TrueCrimeCommunity #PsychologyOfCrime

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • Harvey Adelson Phone Records, Coded Texts, and Vietnam Attempt
    2025/09/04
    Harvey Adelson Phone Records, Coded Texts, and Vietnam Attempt
    For years, Harvey Adelson has been the quietest figure in the sprawling Markel murder saga. While Donna, Charlie, and Wendy took center stage in the courtroom, Harvey stayed in the background—silent, still, never taking the stand. But newly highlighted evidence is pushing him out of the shadows.

    In this segment of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examine the case threads connecting Harvey to the conspiracy. Phone records show contact between Harvey’s phone and hitman Sigfredo Garcia weeks before Dan Markel’s murder. Was this coincidence—or a direct link? Investigators also point to Harvey’s alleged attempt to book a one-way ticket to Vietnam, suggesting flight and consciousness of guilt. Add in the Dolce Vita recording, where Harvey is present during family conversations prosecutors say were about the crime, and suddenly his “silent father” role looks a lot more active.

    Coffindaffer breaks down how investigators weigh circumstantial evidence against someone like Harvey. How do you prove intent in coded conversations? How do you read travel attempts through the lens of guilt? And does Harvey’s calm, almost dazed courtroom demeanor reflect ignorance—or the quiet stress of a man who knows he may be next?

    This is not a murder-trial case against Harvey, but the pieces point toward potential accessory charges and deeper involvement than he’s ever admitted. Silence doesn’t equal innocence, and Harvey’s silence may finally be catching up with him.

    Featuring: Tony Brueski & retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer
    Keywords: Harvey Adelson, Dan Markel murder, Dolce Vita recording, Vietnam ticket, Sigfredo Garcia, accessory after the fact, Donna Adelson, Charlie Adelson, Hidden Killers

    Hashtags: #HarveyAdelson #DanMarkel #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrime #AdelsonFamily #FloridaCrime #Evidence #DolceVita #Conspiracy

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • Donna Adelson Tried To Bribe Cell-Mate With Grand Piano & Drugs, Then She EXPOSED Donna
    2025/09/04
    Donna Adelson Tried To Bribe Cell-Mate With Grand Piano & Drugs, Then She EXPOSED Donna Donna Adelson is cornered, and the cracks are showing. With the defense running out of credible witnesses, Donna must decide whether to testify—a gamble that could make or break her case. But the courtroom has already heard testimony that paints her as manipulative, arrogant, and willing to promise anything to protect herself.

    A jailhouse informant described Donna’s constant chatter about her case, her handwritten witness “scripts,” and even bizarre bribes—packages of snacks, a $10,000 payment via Zelle from husband Harvey, and yes, a grand piano. The informant claims Donna wanted her to blame Katherine “Kay” Magbanua for hatching the plot against Dan Markel, a narrative full of language that didn’t match Kay’s voice.

    Then came the character witness—Donna’s best friend—insisting she’d never heard Donna threaten anyone. But this was “coffee-friend” testimony: shallow reassurances from someone who knew the brunch version of Donna, not the backroom schemer promising money and pianos.

    And Harvey? His name now surfaces more often, pulled into Donna’s supposed promises and linked through Signal and Zelle. Is this just Donna’s mouth running, or was Harvey closer to the game than we thought?

    In this episode, we explore how Donna’s narcissism may be her downfall. From bribery attempts that sound like late-night infomercials to character witnesses who barely scratch the surface, the case against her grows more surreal by the day. And as the moment of truth approaches, one question looms: will Donna take the stand to “explain it all,” or will cross-examination shred what little credibility she has left?

    Hashtags:
    #DonnaAdelson #AdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #JusticeForDanMarkel #TrueCrimeCommunity #MurderForHire #TrueCrimeDiscussion

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    24 分
  • Kohberger's Mom Sent Him Idaho Crime Video Links... Then He Went Silent
    2025/09/04
    Kohberger's Mom Sent Him Idaho Crime Video Links... Then He Went Silent
    Bryan Kohberger’s private conversations with his mother the night after the Idaho murders reveal disturbing contradictions—between “normal” family chatter and something much darker. His mom sent him a news link detailing how Xana Kernodle fought back against her attacker. Innocent sharing of local news, or was she unknowingly feeding her son the kind of detail he was obsessed with?

    We dive deep into these moments: hours of calls with his mom the morning of the murders, text messages that veered from brutal crime reports to coffee beans and a “sweet girl” at the coffee shop. Add in the infamous barista encounter, and suddenly the conversation reads less like small talk and more like obsession.

    Then come the letters—one groveling plea to keep his teaching assistantship, the other a venomous attack aimed at a female professor. This whiplash between desperation and arrogance exposes the duality of Kohberger’s psychology: women he needed were tolerated, women he didn’t need were degraded.

    In this episode, we ask the hard questions: Was Kohberger speaking in code with his mom? Were these conversations his way of processing the murders in plain sight? Or was this just another chapter in his long pattern of contempt for women, masked by academic ambition?

    Stay with us as we piece together how even the most mundane conversations may carry chilling undertones when you know what came next.

    Hashtags:
    #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeCommunity #Criminology #JusticeForXana #JusticeForEthan #TrueCrimeDiscussion #PsychologyOfCrime

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Kohberger’s “Mom Text” & Donna’s Grand Piano: How Loyalty Turns Criminal
    2025/09/04
    Kohberger’s “Mom Text” & Donna’s Grand Piano: How Loyalty Turns Criminal

    Today’s full Hidden Killers Live digs into two explosive storylines and a deep psychological dive that ties them together. First, we unpack a new detail in the Bryan Kohberger case: the night-after exchange with his mother, including a link she sent describing the victim’s bruises and fight back. Was it innocent true-crime chatter between a mom and her criminology-student son—or something far more unsettling in hindsight? We connect that moment to Kohberger’s narrow fixations, the “coffee shop girl,” and his Jekyll/Hyde letters to Washington State University—groveling in one breath, arrogant and contemptuous toward a female professor in the next.
    Then we pivot to Donna Adelson and the trial reality closing in. We break down the jailhouse witness who says Donna scripted her testimony word-for-word, promised packages and phone time, even floated $10,000, veneers, and a grand piano—with Harvey allegedly wired in via Zelle/Signal. We weigh how much of that is Donna’s mouth versus a real logistics web, and whether character-witness “coffee friends” help or hurt her in front of a jury.

    Hour two zooms out to the system beneath the headlines: enmeshed families. Psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott joins Tony, Stacy, and Todd to map the continuum (disengaged → balanced → enmeshed), cultural norms around close-knit loyalty, and how a narcissistic parent converts “love” into control. We get granular on roles (golden child, scapegoat), why kids learn not to push back, how “mom in your head” can sabotage adult relationships and marriages, and why some adult children feel literal relief when a controlling parent dies. We also confront the hard question: how does enmeshment escalate from everyday manipulation to high-stakes loyalty—the kind that risks careers, freedom, and, in the Adelson world, alleged cover-ups?

    If you’re following the Kohberger case, the Adelson trial, or you’ve lived inside a family where loyalty and control got tangled, this is two hours of context, questions, and candid conversation. Drop your take in the comments—what crossed the line for you today?

    Hashtags :
    #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #BryanKohberger #DonnaAdelson #AdelsonTrial #DanMarkel #EnmeshedFamilies #TrueCrime #PsychologyOfCrime #CourtroomDrama

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 45 分
  • Wendy Adelson’s Ex Reveals Chilling Confession About Charlie’s Murder Plot
    2025/09/04
    Wendy Adelson’s Ex Reveals Chilling Confession About Charlie’s Murder Plot

    In this episode of Hidden Killers Live, Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, Stacy Cole, and Todd Michaels dig deep into one of the most revealing moments in the Dan Markel murder investigation: the police interrogation of Wendy Adelson’s ex-boyfriend, Dr. Jeffrey Lacoste.

    Recorded in the aftermath of early arrests tied to the hit on FSU law professor Dan Markel, the interrogation showcases how detectives worked to separate suspicion from truth. At first, Lacoste himself was under the microscope. But what unfolded quickly redirected focus onto the Adelson family—Wendy, Charlie, and their controlling matriarch, Donna.

    Lacoste recalled haunting conversations with Wendy, including one where she confided that Charlie Adelson had “legitimately explored” hiring someone to kill Markel. Not a joke, not an offhand remark, but a chillingly serious disclosure. His statement matched courtroom testimony years later, but in this raw police interview, the gravity hits even harder.

    Our panel breaks down credibility cues, body language, and tempo of disclosure, explaining why Lacoste read as a highly reliable source—even while acknowledging his lingering attachment to Wendy, which slightly complicated his objectivity. We also explore his sharp memory for details, dates, and conversations, and why the one moment he couldn’t precisely recall raises questions worth unpacking.

    The interrogation also highlights Charlie Adelson’s bizarre behavior—bragging about his connections to Green Berets and surrounding himself with militant types, despite being a wealthy South Florida dentist. Was this insecurity? Narcissism? A desperate attempt to project toughness after years under his mother’s thumb?

    With convictions already secured against Charlie Adelson, Sigfredo Garcia, and Katherine Magbanua, attention now turns to Wendy and Donna. The Lacoste interrogation remains a critical piece of the puzzle in exposing the family’s role in this murder-for-hire plot.

    Join us as we dissect the interrogation line by line, revealing the psychology, the family dynamics, and the chilling implications for everyone tied to Dan Markel’s death.

    Hashtags

    #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacoste #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #ForensicPsychology #MurderForHire #LegalAnalysis

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872




    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
  • “It’d Be Easier If Dan Wasn’t Here”: Wendy Adelson Leak Explained by Jeffrey Lacasse
    2025/09/03
    “It’d Be Easier If Dan Wasn’t Here”: Wendy Adelson Leak Explained by Jeffrey Lacasse

    In this deep-dive, we analyze a pivotal stretch of the Jeffrey Lacasse police interrogation and the candid round-table that follows—unpacking what it reveals about Wendy Adelson, Charlie Adelson, and Donna Adelson in the Dan Markel case. The conversation focuses on behavioral forensics: emotional regulation, “leakage,” narcissistic injury, family systems, and coercive control—terms that help map motive and mindset without relying on speculation alone.

    Lacasse recounts late-night talks in which Wendy lamented feeling trapped in Tallahassee by custody litigation and let slip a chilling line: life would be “more convenient” if Dan weren’t around. He adds that Wendy referenced Charlie looking into “how it would be done” and “how much it would cost.” In the interrogation room, these statements land with weight—not as jokes, but as actionable disclosures that align with later courtroom narratives. We break down why Lacasse reads as credible: consistent tempo of disclosure, congruent affect, and high recall—alongside the caveat that his lingering attachment to Wendy could color certain interpretations.

    The panel then probes Charlie Adelson’s persona construction—his habit of posturing with “tough” circles, talk of military-adjacent acquaintances, and proximity to people comfortable with criminal enterprise. Is this insecurity, narcissism, or a lifelong rehearsal of dominance learned at home? We examine how Donna Adelson’s alleged top-down control may have shaped the siblings’ communication style—emotion-first, consequence-later—and why that can result in catastrophic “leakage” (unguarded admissions, careless phone chatter, reckless bravado).

    We also discuss cognitive dissonance inside tightly bound families: why challenging the matriarch would threaten the children’s own identity narratives, and how “safety” can be misdefined as allegiance to dysfunction. Finally, we situate these insights within the legal framework—murder-for-hire theory, motive arising from custody and relocation conflict, and credibility markers detectives scrutinize in major-case interrogations.

    If you follow the Markel murder timeline, this segment adds crucial psychological context to evidence already tested in court. It’s a guided tour through behavior, motive, and family dynamics—where every “offhand” comment may carry forensic weight.

    Hashtags #WendyAdelson #CharlieAdelson #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JeffreyLacasse #TrueCrime #MurderForHire #BehavioralAnalysis #LegalAnalysis #Interrogation

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • Echo Chamber of Control: Robin Dreeke Breaks Down the Adelson Family Psychology
    2025/09/03
    Echo Chamber of Control: Robin Dreeke Breaks Down the Adelson Family Psychology

    In this explosive deep dive, retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke, former head of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, joins Hidden Killers Live to unravel the tangled psychology of the Adelson family. At the center of this discussion: Donna Adelson’s obsessive control, Charlie Adelson’s dangerous insecurities, and Wendy Adelson’s revealing slip-ups that pointed investigators toward a murder-for-hire plot.

    The episode begins with comparisons between Jackie Fulford, Donna’s so-called “doppelgänger attorney,” and the broader Adelson pattern of surrounding themselves with mirrors of their own self-image. Dreeke describes this as the classic “echo chamber” — a family environment where validation replaces reality, breeding narcissism, paranoia, and control.

    From there, the conversation turns to the police interrogation of Dr. Jeffrey Lacoste, Wendy Adelson’s ex-boyfriend. His testimony is not only haunting but also deeply telling. Lacoste recalls Wendy confiding that her brother Charlie had “looked into options” for getting rid of Dan Markel. He describes Charlie openly talking about money, hitmen, and how much it would cost — chilling disclosures that made Charlie the first suspect to enter his mind when news of Dan’s murder broke.

    Robin Dreeke dissects Lacoste’s credibility, noting his remarkable memory for dates, his consistent disclosure tempo, and his vulnerability as a man still under Wendy’s spell. Dreeke explains how narcissistic family systems thrive on manipulation, impulsivity, and a desperate need for external validation — traits seen across Donna, Wendy, and Charlie.

    The discussion also explores Charlie Adelson’s bizarre associations with Green Berets, criminal circles, and the Latin Kings, questioning why a wealthy dentist would gravitate toward such company. Dreeke suggests this was Charlie’s way of masking insecurity, rebelling against his mother’s dominance, and fabricating an image of power.

    This is not just a story of one murder — it’s a case study in how toxic family dynamics, unchecked narcissism, and impulsive decisions can escalate into tragedy.

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
    続きを読む 一部表示
    57 分