エピソード

  • The suitcase survived the fire - and the official story didn't explain why

    The suitcase survived the fire - and the official story didn't explain why
    2026/10/30
    A leather suitcase in the ashes of a Ferriday shoe shop and its burned owner name no killers - what really happened that night in Ferriday, Louisiana?

    The suitcase survived the fire - and the official story didn't explain why

    In this episode, we follow the case of Frank Morris and the unexplained detail that redirects an entire investigation: a scorched-but-intact suitcase found amid a blaze that killed a local shopkeeper. We trace the scene, the interviews, and the local forces that shaped the inquiry - and ask how one small object reframes the whole story.

    Person: Frank Morris
    Location: Ferriday, Louisiana
    Date: December 10, 1964
    Event: Arson of Frank's Shoe Service
    Case: FBI investigations (closed 1965; records continued; formal closure 2016)

    - A fire destroyed Frank Morris and his shop while leaving a leather suitcase with an unbroken bourbon bottle and unburned newspapers inside.
    - Morris escaped the initial flames, was interviewed three times by federal agents, described two white men outside, then lapsed into a coma and died four days later.
    - A confidential informant recorded a sequence: E.D. Morace asked Klan members to beat "Old Frank," then called back to cancel - and the next night the shop burned.
    - Between 1964 and 1967, fourteen Black men were murdered in the river corridor around Concordia Parish; cases were treated separately rather than as a pattern.
    - Four primary suspects were questioned over decades across three FBI investigations, no one was charged, and local authorities declined to take over the matter.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • He was accompanied by a convicted dark-web drug lord and that man's attorney

    He was accompanied by a convicted dark-web drug lord and that man's attorney
    2026/10/30
    A forensic expert opens a cryptocurrency wallet, accompanied by a dark-web drug lord and his attorney. A single missing day unravels a complex bitcoin transfer.

    He was accompanied by a convicted dark-web drug lord and that man's attorney

    This episode delves into the events surrounding a cryptocurrency wallet opening witnessed by a forensic expert, a convicted dark-web drug lord, and his attorney. It explores the implications of a crucial missing day in the official record and the subsequent movement of bitcoins.

    Date: March 6, 2025
    Person: Jiří Berger
    Event: Cryptocurrency wallet opening
    Location: Czech Republic
    Value: 468 bitcoins

    - Tomáš Jiřikovský, a Czech national, ran Sheep Marketplace, a dark-web black market for narcotics and weapons, which collapsed in 2013 after a hack.
    - In 2017, Jiřikovský was sentenced to nine years in prison for embezzlement, drug trafficking, and illegal possession of firearms.
    - The Czech Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that seized hardware must be returned to its owner if a criminal connection cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
    - Jiřikovský's attorneys used this ruling to recover hardware containing dormant bitcoin wallets by January 2025.
    - In August 2023, Jiřikovský's attorney, Kárim Titz, offered a "donation" of bitcoins to the Czech Ministry of Justice, structured as a tax deduction.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分
  • The three weapons that erased 128 Viet Cong from the report

    The three weapons that erased 128 Viet Cong from the report
    2026/10/29
    US Army intelligence targets a Viet Cong unit in a free-fire zone, but soldiers find a village of civilians. What happens next is covered up.

    The three weapons that erased 128 Viet Cong from the report

    This episode explores the events leading up to a devastating incident in Sơn Mỹ village and the immediate aftermath. It raises questions about how such a massacre was initially reported and subsequently concealed.

    Event: Sơn Mỹ Massacre
    Date: March 16, 1968
    Location: Sơn Mỹ village, Quảng Ngãi province, Vietnam
    US Army Unit: Charlie Company, Task Force Barker
    Initial Report: 128 Viet Cong killed in action

    - Charlie Company had experienced six weeks of frustration and grief from invisible enemy attacks before the operation.
    - Captain Ernest Medina briefed Charlie Company that anyone remaining in Sơn Mỹ village would likely be Viet Cong or a sympathizer.
    - Lieutenant Colonel Frank Barker's orders included burning houses, killing livestock, destroying food supplies, and poisoning wells.
    - PFC Michael Bernhardt later testified that he saw no military-aged males among the living or dead in the village.
    - Ronald Ridenhour, a former soldier with Charlie Company, mailed a three-page letter detailing the events to thirty members of Congress and other officials.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • The name on the door hid a payroll that paid Madoff's recruits

    The name on the door hid a payroll that paid Madoff's recruits
    2026/10/29
    A small brokerage firm, Cohmad Securities, shared an office floor with Bernard Madoff's investment firm. Its name hid a secret about who fed the fraud.

    The name on the door hid a payroll that paid Madoff's recruits

    This episode explores Cohmad Securities, a firm with a name that revealed its hidden connection to Bernard Madoff. It delves into the company's structure, its key players, and how it operated as a recruitment engine for the Madoff investment fraud.

    Person: Robert Jaffe
    Date: December 2008
    Location: Midtown Manhattan
    Revenue Source: Bernard Madoff's firm
    Percentage: 99.7%

    - Cohmad Securities was co-founded by Maurice "Sonny" Cohn and Bernard Madoff in 1985, operating from the same building as Madoff's investment firm.
    - Marcia Cohn, Maurice's daughter, served as both president and compliance officer for Cohmad, holding a 25% stake in the company.
    - Robert Jaffe, Cohmad's vice president, recruited over 150 accounts and channeled more than one billion dollars into Madoff's fund through social networking.
    - Cohmad representatives' compensation structure penalized them for client withdrawals, an unusual arrangement in the securities business.
    - By 2002, Maurice Cohn began receiving a flat annual payment of two million dollars directly from Madoff Securities, rather than commissions tied to new accounts.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • The Italian Coin That Undid a Twenty-Year Swindle

    The Italian Coin That Undid a Twenty-Year Swindle
    2026/10/28
    A French socialite claims a mysterious safe holds millions from an American millionaire - but when it's opened, what will be revealed?

    The Italian Coin That Undid a Twenty-Year Swindle

    This episode delves into the extraordinary case of Thérèse Humbert, a woman who orchestrated a twenty-year swindle within the French legal system. It explores how she maintained her elaborate fiction and the powerful figures who enabled her deception.

    Case: The Humbert Swindle
    Person: Thérèse Humbert
    Date: 1902 (safe opening)
    Location: Paris, France
    Period: Late 19th to early 20th century

    - Thérèse Daurignac, born in 1856, learned the power of false legitimacy from her father, who spent his life claiming to be a secret noble.
    - As a girl, Thérèse persuaded friends to pool their jewelry to create an illusion of collective wealth, a tactic she later scaled up.
    - In 1879, she married Frédéric Humbert, son of a powerful legal mind, who was aware of her fabricated story before their marriage.
    - Thérèse invented an American millionaire, Robert Henry Henry, and a dramatic train rescue to explain her supposed inheritance.
    - Her brothers played the roles of Henry's nephews, appearing in courtrooms for years to maintain the illusion of a contested will.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • The white cloth that disproved the army's claim of gunmen

    The white cloth that disproved the army's claim of gunmen
    2026/10/28
    In 1971, British soldiers claimed they were under fire from republican gunmen in Ballymurphy, West Belfast. But official records show most bullets entered victims' backs.

    The white cloth that disproved the army's claim of gunmen

    This episode explores the events of August 1971 in Ballymurphy, where eleven people died over 48 hours. It examines the official narrative and the evidence that emerged decades later, challenging the initial claims of the British Army.

    Event: Ballymurphy killings
    Date: August 9-11, 1971
    Location: Ballymurphy, West Belfast
    Military Unit: First Battalion, Parachute Regiment
    Operation: Operation Demetrius

    - Operation Demetrius was launched on August 9, 1971, to intern suspected Provisional IRA members without trial, guided by intelligence later deemed flawed.
    - The First Battalion, Parachute Regiment, was deployed to the Catholic nationalist estate of Ballymurphy, which bordered a British Army base.
    - Father Hugh Mullan, a 38-year-old Catholic priest, was shot and killed while reportedly waving a white cloth as he approached a wounded man.
    - Daniel Teggart's body was found with fourteen bullet wounds, most of which entered his back, despite the army's claim of returning fire against gunmen.
    - The 1972 inquests into the deaths returned open verdicts, which neither confirmed innocence nor established culpability, leaving the official narrative unchallenged for decades.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • The World Bank's four-item checklist blocked loans it never proved mattered

    The World Bank's four-item checklist blocked loans it never proved mattered
    2026/10/27
    A global financial framework promised economic growth to developing nations, but its strict governance checklist was ignored by countries that then thrived. What does it measure?

    The World Bank's four-item checklist blocked loans it never proved mattered

    This episode explores the World Bank's "Governance and Development" report from 1992, which introduced a four-item checklist as a prerequisite for economic growth. It examines the contradiction between this framework and the actual development paths of various countries, raising questions about the checklist's true impact.

    Date: 1992
    Institution: World Bank
    Report Title: Governance and Development
    Criteria: Public sector management, accountability, legal framework for development, transparency and information
    Economist: Dani Rodrik

    - The World Bank's 1992 report outlined four specific elements as essential for sound economic policy.
    - These criteria were presented as prerequisites for development, not mere suggestions.
    - The framework's logic suggested that fixing issues like corruption and lack of rule of law would lead to economic development.
    - Historically, no country in the postwar era developed by following the prescribed sequence of the checklist.
    - In 1996, the International Monetary Fund made governance compliance a condition for accessing loans.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Pilot Training That Hid a Killer System

    The Pilot Training That Hid a Killer System
    2026/10/27
    Boeing faces a crisis after two fatal crashes, as internal documents reveal a hidden flight control system was removed from pilot training. The race for market dominance against Airbus led to a deadly compromise.

    The Pilot Training That Hid a Killer System

    This episode explores the critical decisions made at Boeing as it rushed to compete with Airbus, leading to the development of the 737 MAX. It delves into the internal conflicts and documented choices that concealed a crucial flight system from pilots and regulators.

    Event: Lion Air Flight 610 crash
    Date: October 2018
    Aircraft: Boeing 737 MAX
    System: Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS)
    Location: Java Sea

    - Boeing faced pressure to quickly counter Airbus's A320neo, leading to the 737 MAX.
    - The MAX's new engines required a software system, MCAS, to correct aerodynamic tendencies.
    - Boeing's commercial pitch for the MAX promised no need for additional simulator training for pilots.
    - Internal documents show MCAS was deliberately removed from pilot training materials.
    - American Airlines pilots confronted Boeing managers in November 2018, demanding to know what was on their airplanes.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分