The TRIR vs. SIF Paradox
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
The TRIR vs. SIF Paradox
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
The Podcast explores "The Paradox of TRIR vs. SIF," highlighting a concerning trend where the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) declines while Serious Injuries and Fatalities (SIFs) persist. It argues that this isn't a flaw in the metrics themselves, but rather a reflection of the inherent difficulty in addressing systemic risks and organizational commitment to make transformative changes. Here we propose resolving this paradox by integrating resilience engineering and systems thinking into safety management. It suggests treating TRIR as a source of "weak signals" that, when analyzed alongside a broader "holistic eco-system of safety signals" using tools like AI, can proactively identify hidden weak signals and prevent catastrophic SIF events. Ultimately, the resolution depends on leadership's willingness to invest in systemic changes and foster a culture of learning to overcome inertia and improve overall safety.