『The Property Trio (formerly The Property Planner, Buyer and Professor)』のカバーアート

The Property Trio (formerly The Property Planner, Buyer and Professor)

The Property Trio (formerly The Property Planner, Buyer and Professor)

著者: Cate Bakos David Johnston and Mike Mortlock
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Formerly The Property Planner, Buyer and Professor, our show rebranded in 2023 to The Property Trio.

Residential property is the only asset class we live in, it is where we raise our families, and it is our most expensive investment, yet property advice remains unregulated. Our objective is to educate time-poor professionals through deep insights from our experts who have provided thousands of Australians with personalised advice and education spanning two decades. In a climate where we are overloaded with information and one size fits all recommendations from the media, well-meaning friends and family and so-called advisers, we will distill the raw truth from the ill-informed.

So join the Property Planner, David Johnston, The Property Buyer, Cate Bakos and the Quantity Surveyor, Mike Mortlock as they take you on a journey of discovery through the maze of property, mortgage, and money decisions to empower you to create your ideal lifestyle!



Links to your hosts:
https://www.catebakos.com.au/
https://propertyplanning.com.au/
https://www.mcgqs.com.au/

Copyright The Property Trio
個人ファイナンス 経済学
エピソード
  • #330: Inside the 2025 PIPA Investor Survey - What Investors Really Think About Property and the Future of Property Investment
    2025/10/06
    Got a question for the trio? https://forms.zohopublic.com/propertyplanningaustralia/form/GotaquestionforthePropertyTrio/formperma/zYCQAxzE_24CVlDafP1ozyzwtmB-8m1iCNtCTgDvHXM

    🎙️In this week’s episode, Dave, Cate and Mike unpack the eye-opening results from PIPA’s 2025 Annual Property Investor Sentiment Survey, now in its 11th year. As two of PIPA’s board members, Cate and Mike bring insider insights into what’s really behind the growing number of investor exits, and what it all means for Australia’s tight rental market.

    🏠 The headline figure is striking: 16.7% of investors sold at least one property in the past year. This is the highest rate since the question was first introduced in 2022. Cate explains how rising costs, increasing legislative uncertainty, and fears over potential tax reforms are driving investors out just when rental demand is at record highs.

    🌏 Dave turns the focus to the cities, asking whether Victoria remains the hardest hit. Mike reveals that while Melbourne’s investor sale rate climbed slightly to 22.1%, Brisbane (19.7%) and Perth (11%) aren’t far behind. It’s not just a Victorian problem; it’s national. Cate ponders the idea that some Perth investors might be finally “cashing out” after a decade of sluggish returns, showing how long-term fatigue and short-term gains can both influence investor behaviour.

    🏡 Regional markets tell their own story. Cate shares that regional Queensland led the country with 15.8% of investors selling, (more than double last year’s figure), while regional Victoria recorded 7.9%, and regional NSW fell sharply to 5.5%. She suggests that recent interest rate cuts may have steadied nerves in NSW, while Queensland’s strong capital gains tempted investors to sell.

    💰 Who’s buying these properties? Mike notes that 42% of sales went to other investors (up from 31% last year), but the rest were snapped up by first home buyers. It’s a bittersweet outcome: great for new homeowners, but another hit to rental supply as more properties leave the investor pool.

    📉 Cate delves into the reasons for selling, citing rising compliance and insurance costs, the desire to reduce debt, and increasing frustration over complex rental reforms. Policy uncertainty looms large, with more than half of respondents saying they’d stop investing if negative gearing rules changed, and 35% saying they’d exit if CGT discounts were reduced.

    ⚠️ Mike raises another concern—communication breakdown. A massive 64% of investors were unaware of Victoria’s new vacant land tax, and 60% had only limited understanding of tenancy law changes. Even more startling, 10% said they’d never heard from their state government at all. This lack of engagement leaves investors navigating complex changes blindfolded.

    🌈 But there’s a silver lining. Despite the challenges, confidence is on the rise—nearly 60% of investors believe the next 12 months present good buying opportunities. And in a surprise twist, Melbourne has reclaimed top spot as Australia’s preferred investment destination, leaping from 26% last year to 41%.

    💡 Tune in to hear The Trio unpack this up-to-the-minute findings, their message to policymakers, and their rationale behind the findings. Listeners can request a copy of the survey results by contacting us.

    And our gold nuggets!.....

    Mike Mortlock's gold nugget: Mike makes the point about increasing tax losses since 2020/2021's tax year impacting the investor cohort significantly.

    Cate Bakos's gold nugget: Cate puts her PIPA board member hat on and encourages our community of investors to participate in the survey next year.

    Shownotes: https://www.propertytrio.com.au/2025/10/06/pipa-investor-sentiment-survey-2025/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分
  • #329: Climate Change and Property - How to Navigate the Challenges & Avoid Costly Mistakes
    2025/09/29
    Got a question for the trio? https://forms.zohopublic.com/propertyplanningaustralia/form/GotaquestionforthePropertyTrio/formperma/zYCQAxzE_24CVlDafP1ozyzwtmB-8m1iCNtCTgDvHXM

    🎙️This week on The Property Trio, Mike, Cate and Dave dive into how environmental risks are reshaping the housing market, from skyrocketing insurance premiums to property value discounts in flood-prone areas.

    🌏 The scale of the risk is staggering. Drawing on the Climate Council’s At Our Front Door report and the latest insurance data, the Trio unpack what “moderate” and “high-risk” actually mean for everyday Australians. With more than two million homes already exposed, and suburbs like Hawkesbury and Brisbane at the front line, the warnings of 2019 and 2022 are no longer projections, they’re reality.

    💰 Insurance has become the frontline battle. The average Australian might pay around $2,200 for home and contents cover, but in high-risk zones, families are seeing $7,000, $12,000, even $30,000 premiums. For some, the flood component alone tops $8,000 annually. The Trio explore how these costs push households into stress, and why underinsurance, (or no insurance at all), is becoming common in vulnerable regions.

    🏠 Property markets are already adjusting. Buyers are cautious, lenders are wary, and price discounts are appearing. UTS research showed Richmond homes in 1-in-100 flood zones selling for nearly 11% less, while post-flood Lismore recorded value drops of around 30%. Across Narrabri, Forbes, and even Sydney pockets like Windsor, the same hesitation is taking hold.

    📊 The bigger picture matters too. Disasters are costing billions annually, with projections hitting $94 billion per year by 2060 under high-emission scenarios. Banks, heavily exposed to mortgages, face systemic risks, while lower-income households bear the brunt. Yet preparedness lags, with builders, codes, and infrastructure still playing catch-up.

    🛠️ So what can investors do? The Trio share a practical five-step checklist:
    1. Use the data—flood maps, hazard reports, and council resources.
    2. Get insurance quotes before you buy.
    3. Assess the build—look for resilience features.
    4. Diversify your portfolio across regions and risks.
    5. Stay alert to policy and regulation changes.
    ⚠️ Climate change isn’t just about the weather, it’s about the numbers. Premiums, property values, and policies are shifting now. Smart investors who stress-test their assumptions will stay ahead; those who ignore the data risk owning tomorrow’s troubled assets.

    Listeners can request Mike's checklist by contacting us.

    And our gold nuggets!.....

    Cate Bakos's gold nugget: Cate takes listeners through her process for checking online quotes through insurers. Not a precise solution on it's own, but a very good gauge for flagging potential issues from the onset.

    Mike Mortlock's gold nugget: Mike warns listeners about the reliability (or unreliability) of online insurance calculators for determining insurance rebuild cost estimates.

    David Johnston's gold nugget: Dave echoes Mike's point, and reminds our listeners about the importance of adhering to a robust checklist associated with avoiding risks when it comes to property selection.

    Show notes: https://www.propertytrio.com.au/2025/09/29/climate-change-and-property/

    And registrations are open for our early 2026 LIVE session in Melbourne. Seats are limited, so don't delay! Reach out to us to reserve your place.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分
  • #328: Avoiding Compromised Investments - Should You Buy Now or Save More? Plus the Real Cost of Overpriced New Builds
    2025/09/22
    Got a question for the trio? https://forms.zohopublic.com/propertyplanningaustralia/form/GotaquestionforthePropertyTrio/formperma/zYCQAxzE_24CVlDafP1ozyzwtmB-8m1iCNtCTgDvHXM

    🎙️This week on The Property Trio, Cate and Dave field two great listener questions. Max, a young investor weighing his options for a second property asks: Should I buy now at 90% LVR and pay lenders mortgage insurance (LMI), or wait until I save for 80% LVR and a lower rate? 💡 Getting in sooner

    Dave explains that buying at 90% LVR can bring a purchase forward by one to three years, giving valuable time for capital growth. While LMI and slightly higher interest rates add costs, these are often outweighed by early market entry—provided investors maintain cashflow buffers and commit to a long holding period.

    📉 Avoid the cheaper asset trap
    Cate warns that buying a lower-quality property to get in sooner is risky. Compromises in location, dwelling type, or fundamentals can significantly underperform over time. Even small differences in annual growth rates can compound into major wealth gaps.

    🎙️ Our second listener question is from from Peter, who’s weighing up what dwelling types to invest in Melbourne with a budget of $500k–$650K. Peter also asks the Trio whether a new build in Perth could deliver stronger long-term returns.

    🏡 Peter shares that he’s been pitched house-and-land and townhouse packages by property investment groups, only to find they’re priced $50k–$100k higher than local builder offerings. This raises red flags for the Trio, who unpack how “introducers” and commission-driven sales can inflate prices and compromise buyers’ outcomes. Cate warns of the dangers of overpaying, the poor land-to-asset ratio of new builds, and the risk of investing in stock that lacks scarcity or uniqueness. 📉 Dave builds on this by explaining how oversupply in fringe estates puts capital growth under pressure. When developers keep releasing new stock, yesterday’s shiny home quickly becomes tomorrow’s dated dwelling. Together, the Trio emphasise that buying brand-new—whether in Melbourne or Perth—comes with hidden risks, from inflated valuations at settlement to lower demand from owner-occupiers down the track.

    The discussion then pivots to alternative strategies. Rather than chasing fringe house-and-land packages, Cate suggests exploring established units and boutique apartments in well-located Melbourne suburbs where buyers can tap into amenity, strong transport links, and genuine scarcity. Dave adds that regional cities may also present better value within Peter’s budget.

    And our gold nuggets!.....

    Cate Bakos's gold nugget: Buyers need to understand and apply land-to-asset ratio to every purchase.

    David Johnston's gold nugget: "I would prefer people get into the market sooner rather than later if they have an appropriate budget, especially given the market we're in with rates falling, the deposit scheme just increasing, prices rising already. And as I touched on, I expect prices to rise at a faster rate in 2026."

    Shownotes: https://www.propertytrio.com.au/2025/09/22/listener-questions-september/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分
まだレビューはありません