『The Nova Society』のカバーアート

The Nova Society

The Nova Society

著者: Dr. Mark George Bound Dr. Scott Gerschwer & Dr. Brooklynn Ann Welden
無料で聴く

We address listener questions about the headlines shaping today’s world and the social and political forces behind them. Our mission is to offer clear, unbiased commentary rooted in critical thinking and analytical rigor. Through thoughtful, in‑depth conversations, we examine current events and the challenges facing society, while still keeping space for engaging, enjoyable dialogue. We hold that facts matter, and that misinformation and disinformation remain among the most serious threats to an informed and healthy civic culture.

© 2026 The Nova Society
政治・政府 政治学 社会科学 科学
エピソード
  • Max Miller and the Ohio 7th S5E96 08.14.2026
    2026/08/14

    Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!

    Henry from Toledo, Ohio writes:

    Representative Max Miller says he intends to stay in his House race despite being accused of sexual abuse by his ex‑wife and despite Republicans publicly calling for him to step down. But the filing deadline has passed, and the party is now effectively stuck with him on the ballot.

    Most people would assume Miller is headed for a rough election, even in a ruby‑red district.

    So, my question to the panel is this: If Miller actually wins, what does that say about Ohio’s 7th District and the electorate more broadly? What do voters overlook, tolerate, or rationalize in moments like this? And second, why do you think Miller chose to stay in the race? Did he calculate that in a party willing to nominate Trump, the boundaries of what is politically disqualifying have shifted so dramatically that almost anything goes now?

    Support the show

    The Nova Society Podcast

    In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.

    Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

    Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
    Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

    Support the Nova Society
    Email us your Questions

    Subscribe to the Nova Society

    Subscribe to our RSS Feed
    Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
    Past episodes & read our blog Here.

    JCIS

    Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes
    Spotify
    ...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • A suggestion from Australia for the Iran Crisis S5E95 08.12.2026
    2026/08/12

    Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!

    Robby, from Melbourne, Australia writes,

    You all must be getting dizzy over there in America. Every day feels like Groundhog Day, the same cycle repeating itself.

    The war is supposedly won. Their capabilities are destroyed. Then suddenly we’re bombing again. More service members are hurt. We’re talking. We have a deal. Then we don’t have a deal.

    One minute it’s “We’ll respond forcefully,” the next it’s “Never mind, we’re stepping back.” At this point, does anyone actually know what’s going on?

    Here in Australia, it’s almost become a running joke. You can’t walk into a pub without someone shaking their head at the sheer dysfunction in Washington. And I’m not talking about one person, I mean the government as a whole. The executive branch lurches from one position to another, and Congress seems unable to assert any coherent strategy. People here genuinely wonder how American public confidence in its leadership remains as high as it does.

    Meanwhile, Australia has stayed almost entirely silent throughout this conflict. Our priority is economic stability. We favor diplomacy, we avoid escalation, and we have no intention of sending troops.

    You’ve talked a lot about diplomacy on past episodes, but I want to float an idea. If Middle Eastern partners aren’t making progress, is it time to look beyond the usual mediators? What if China, Japan, and Australia took the lead in negotiations? Could a coalition of major Asia‑Pacific powers produce better results? Would the United States even accept that kind of arrangement? And if it did, given the volatility of American decision‑making right now, would it make any difference?

    You often say the U.S. needs an exit strategy, but from the outside it looks like every potential off‑ramp gets burned the moment it appears. So is Washington actually trying to get out of this conflict, or is it stuck in a cycle it no longer knows how to break?

    Support the show

    The Nova Society Podcast

    In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.

    Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

    Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
    Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

    Support the Nova Society
    Email us your Questions

    Subscribe to the Nova Society

    Subscribe to our RSS Feed
    Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
    Past episodes & read our blog Here.

    JCIS

    Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes
    Spotify
    ...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • The Fauci Hearings and COVID S5E94 08.10.2026
    2026/08/10

    Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!

    Rachel from Monterey, California writes:

    Last week, Senator Rand Paul held a hearing aimed squarely at attacking Dr. Anthony Fauci, essentially a physician with a long record of controversial claims going after one of the world’s foremost experts on infectious diseases. Senator Hawley jumped in as well, trying to score points while Dr. Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment in response to nearly every question. At one point they even removed Fauci’s attorney from the room, which struck me as completely outrageous.

    The core issue, of course, is whether the NIH funded research in China that could have contributed to the COVID outbreak. But what stood out just as much was how intensely politicized the entire hearing became. It raises the question: are Republicans planning to use this spectacle as a campaign tool in November? If so, what talking points might they lean on? And if they do weaponize this, how should Democrats respond?

    Support the show

    The Nova Society Podcast

    In season 5, we will transition to 3 episodes per week and expand episode lengths for more in-depth conversations.

    Stay tuned for more information about our proposed weekly second channel, The Nova Society-Side Projects, where we have conversations with guests about topics important to them and to you, our listeners.

    Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
    Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.

    Support the Nova Society
    Email us your Questions

    Subscribe to the Nova Society

    Subscribe to our RSS Feed
    Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
    Past episodes & read our blog Here.

    JCIS

    Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes
    Spotify
    ...

    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません