Send us a text

In this episode, the Shawn, Matt, & Porter discuss various topics including the role of AI in communication, medical debt, and the loneliness crisis in Utah. First up: AI is changing the way that people speak. Researchers analyzed 280,000 YouTube videos from academic channels and found that in the 18 months since ChatGPT was released speakers are using words favored by the chatbot (like delve, realm, and adept) 51% more frequently and they are using other words less frequently. Elder Bednar recently warned that the use of AI can threaten moral agency by causing us to be “acted upon” rather than acting for ourselves. Is this evidence of people giving their agency over to AI? Do we need to be more cautious in our use of AI?

Next up: A federal judge in Texas reversed a Biden-era rule on Friday that permitted medical debt to be wiped from credit reports. Setting aside the legal question, what is the morally correct way to handle credit reports? Some things (a mortgage, student loans, auto loans, credit cards, bankruptcies) get reported, but others do not (civil judgments, tax liens, etc). Is medical debt something that should be on a credit report?

Finally: We are now at the six month mark of the Trump presidency. New state-by-state polling shows his popularity across the United States. If you took the electoral college votes of the states where his disapproval is higher than his approval rating and counted that as votes to remove from office, Trump would be out in a landslide. Should there be a mechanism that allows public opinion to remove someone from office? Congress can impeach for bad behavior, the cabinet can remove for incompetence. Should Americans be able to do so?

The Big Question: Utah ranks among the top five loneliest states in the nation, according to U.S. Census data. More than one in three Utah adults say they feel lonely “always” or “often.” Health officials say it’s more than just a side effect of the pandemic—it’s become a public health priority. Matt Draper, a therapist based in Springville, says that based on his work, the two groups most affected by loneliness in Utah are young adults and seniors. Meanwhile, Utah ranks #1 in the nation for the best economic outlook and #3 for economic performance. They say that money can’t buy happiness, is Utah proving that point? What is Utah doing wrong?

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Guest Introduction
03:00 Debate on Socialism and Capitalism
06:02 Market Trust and Economic Principles
09:00 The Role of Government in the Economy
12:12 The Impact of AI on Language and Agency
17:56 AI's Influence on Decision Making
22:04 Medical Debt and Credit Reporting
31:39 Charity, Compassion, and Medical Debt
34:00 Trump's Approval Ratings and Political Mechanisms
39:00 Public Opinion and Political Accountability
44:02 Loneliness in Utah: A Public Health Concern
01:00:01

Send us a text

Episode Description: This week, we dive into a listener's take on Trump's Brazil tariffs and the "BRICS threat." Then, we explore Iceland's successful 4-day work week and ponder the future of labor in a tech-driven world. We also tackle the contentious issue of mid-decade redistricting in Texas, examining its legality versus its morality. Finally, we discuss the New York Times' coverage of the Tabernacle Choir and President Nelson's guidance on the Church's name, before grappling with the "Big Question": Does scripture point to communal economic equality as the ideal system?

• The Thought Provoker:
  • Topic 1: Iceland's 4-Day Work Week: A Global Model?
    • By 2019, 90% of Iceland's workforce adopted 35-36 hour weeks without pay cuts, largely due to union agreements.
    • Key Statistics: Productivity remained stable or increased, worker well-being significantly improved (lower stress, better work-life balance), and greater gender equality was observed.
    • Robust digital infrastructure played a key role in this successful transition.
    • Discussion points: Is Iceland's model transferable globally? Do companies have a moral obligation to maintain salaries while reducing hours as technology advances? Is the "wage per hour" paradigm outdated for the 21st century?
  • Topic 2: Texas Redistricting Controversy: Legal vs. Moral
    • Former Republican Rep. Burt Solomons criticizes President Trump's pressure on Texas officials to redraw congressional districts mid-decade.
    • Solomons argues Trump's aim is to gain Republican seats and "rig" the 2026 midterms, calling it an "alarming power grab" that erodes public trust and disenfranchises minority voters.
    • Historically, redistricting, while partisan, has generally respected established rules. Mid-decade redistricting is rare and should not be driven by a president's "whim."
    • Discussion points: Is it wrong for Texas to redraw congressional districts now, even if it's technically legal in Texas (which has a history of doing so)? What is the distinction between what is legal and what is morally acceptable in political actions?
  • Topic 3: The Tabernacle Choir & The New York Times: Naming Conventions
    • The Tabernacle Choir at Temple Square recently celebrated its 5,000th continuous episode of Music & the Spoken Word, prompting a New York Times article.
    • The NYT article used the official name of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, acknowledged the common "Mormon" association, and used "Latter-day Saint" as an adjective for members and related concepts.
    • Discussion points: Does this usage align with what President Russell M. Nelson requested regarding the correct name of the Church? What has been the practical application among members since President Nelson's talk?
• The Big Question: Communal Economic Equality – The Ideal System?
  • D&C 82:17-19 outlines principles of communal economic equality:
    • Individuals have equal claims to resources based on "just wants and needs" to manage their "stewardships."
    • The system benefits the entire community, allowing individuals to develop and multiply "talents" (abilities/resources).
    • Gains are contributed to a common "Lord's storehouse" for collective benefit.
    • Encourages prioritizing neighbor's interests and acting with pure motives to glorify God.
  • While the context is the United Order, the question arises: Are these verses describing principles that extend beyond the United Order? Is the ideal economic system one of c

Send us a text

This week on the Latter Day Lens, Matt, Shawn, and Marc dive into a whirlwind of topics, from economic theory and political landscapes to the legal system. Get ready for lively debate and unexpected agreements!

00:01 - 01:00: Kicking Off with Reenactments and Ribbing

The episode opens with Matt introducing Marc as "a guy that voted for Trump," leading into a light-hearted discussion about Marc's Revolutionary War reenactment experience. Matt and Shawn playfully contrast Marc's discipline with Matt's own rebellious nature.

01:00 - 08:48: The Mailbag - Adam Smith's Invisible Hand & Bidets

The hosts address a listener's email challenging Shawn's interpretation of Adam Smith's "invisible hand." While Shawn humbly accepts the historical nuance, he maintains the concept's modern relevance, arguing it motivates producers to provide value. This segues into a humorous tangent about Matt's impulse purchases, including a bidet, prompting a quick topic change.

08:48 - 21:50: The Thought Provoker - Defining "Make America Great Again"

Matt introduces a New York Times opinion piece by Peter Baker, suggesting Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" points to the 1870-1913 era.

• Shawn argues "MAGA" is an intentionally undefined "gimmick."
• Matt posits the era's minimal regulation and high tariffs would appeal to Trump as a capitalist.
• Marc believes "MAGA" signifies a return to a "moral past."
• The discussion expands to whether Trump is a true conservative, with Shawn distinguishing between "reactionism" and "conservatism." Marc agrees with this distinction.
• Matt challenges the idea of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a conservative organization, citing its history of radical change.

21:50 - 32:58: China Shock 2.0 and Tariffs

The hosts discuss economists David Autor and Gordon Hanson's warning about "China Shock 2.0," where China could surpass the US in innovative sectors.

• Matt questions if US tariffs, often politically motivated, inadvertently help China gain a future advantage.
• Shawn suggests tariffs aim for better trade deals.
• Marc expresses little concern for "China Shock 2.0," relying on the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, leading to a humorous debate on the scriptural definition of "soon."

32:58 - 44:54: The Jeffrey Epstein Files

The conversation turns to the controversial Jeffrey Epstein files.

• Matt surprisingly argues against releasing all files (e.g., child pornography) to protect victims, believing law enforcement would have already prosecuted any implicated individuals. He trusts the FBI.
• Shawn and Marc strongly disagree, advocating for full transparency to expose "secret combinations" and ensure justice, expressing skepticism about Epstein's death and alleged cover-ups.
• The debate highlights contrasting views on transparency and the legal system.

44:54 - 54:10: The Big Question - Lawyers, Conflict, and Latter-day Lens Principles

The episode concludes with a "big question" inspired by Alma 10 and 11 on lawyers profiting from societal conflict.

• Matt asks if the current legal system, which incentivizes conflict, is flawed. He proposes alternatives:
  • Lawyers not charging fees.
  • Community councils resolving disputes.
  • A system like the Church's disciplinary councils, where randomly assigned individuals defend both sides.
• Marc agrees the current system encourages litigation.
• Shawn, initially skeptical, is eventually convinced by Matt's arguments, particularly the alternati

Send us a text

This week on The Latter Day Lens, Matt, Shawn, and Graham tackle a thought-provoking lineup of topics that cut to the heart of justice, liberty, and the proper role of government. We dive deep into the surprising reality of America's low crime clearance rates and ask if it's time for a new approach to deterring crime. Then, we pivot to a local controversy in Provo, Utah, where a popular dance fitness program was suddenly shut down, sparking a debate about local control and individual liberty – and whether one always serves the other. Finally, we examine the Trump administration's approach to undocumented workers and employer accountability. Plus, in "The Big Question," we confront the alarming truth about a new, more toxic ingredient in weedkillers and ponder the government's moral obligation to protect its citizens from harmful substances. Tune in for a lively and insightful discussion!

Thought Provoker & Topic 1: The State of Justice - Why Are So Many Crimes Unsolved?

• The Data: We discuss the shocking reality of low crime clearance rates in the U.S., particularly for murders and car thefts, and how America compares to other developed nations.
• The Question: Given that the U.S. incarcerates more people than almost any other country, is our current system effective in deterring crime? What "better way" might we find?

Topic 2: Local Control vs. Individual Liberty - The Provo Dance Class Controversy

• The Story: We break down the unexpected closure of the "Dirtylicious Dance Fitness" program at the Provo Recreation Center after six years, and the city's reasoning.
• Shawn's Take: Shawn, a proponent of local government control, weighs in.
• The Debate: Does this example demonstrate how local control can inadvertently reduce liberty? Is local control a scriptural principle or more of a political preference?

Topic 3: Immigration Enforcement - Who Should Be Held Accountable?

• The Policy: We examine the Trump administration's stated vow to hold companies accountable for employing undocumented workers.
• The Reality: Why have DHS enforcement operations overwhelmingly focused on arresting workers rather than punishing employers?
• The Discussion: Is this the right approach? Should employers who knowingly hire undocumented individuals face more significant repercussions?

The Big Question: Government's Role in Public Safety - The Diquat Dilemma

• The Concern: We uncover the troubling facts about diquat, the highly toxic herbicide ingredient now replacing glyphosate in Roundup, which is banned in many other developed nations.
• The EPA's Stance: Why has the EPA resisted calls for a ban, even as products containing diquat hit U.S. shelves?
• The Core Question: What is the proper role of government in regulating potentially harmful products? If a government knows a substance can harm its citizens, does it have a moral obligation to ban it, or at least warn its citizens?

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Guest Host Introduction
02:49 Understanding Propaganda and Its Implications
05:45 Crime Rates and the Effectiveness of Punishment
08:48 Rethinking the Criminal Justice System
11:32 Community Standards and Local Government Decisions
14:27 The Role of Local Government in Providing Services
25:59 Local Control and Scriptural Principles
28:32 Government's Role in Community Standards
30:09 Immigration and Employer Accountability
34:27 The Role of Government in Public Health
47:11 Trust in Government vs. Free Market Solutions

Don't forget to subscribe, rate, and review "The Latter Day Lens" wherever you listen to podcasts!

Send us a text

This episode of Latter Day Lens dives into some heavy-hitting topics, from the nature of propaganda in foundational American documents to the complexities of the BYU Honor Code and the nuanced role of conflict in societal change.

Here's a breakdown of the key discussions:

• Propaganda: Good or Bad? The hosts grapple with the definition of propaganda, debating whether historical documents like the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers, or even public health campaigns like "Smoking Kills," qualify. Matt argues that if a message is intended to manipulate or is based on carefully selected (or omitted) truths, it's propaganda, regardless of its perceived positive outcome. He points out that even well-intentioned "propaganda" can lead to a skewed understanding of history, creating ongoing societal challenges. Levi, on the other hand, suggests that if something is honestly believed and not intended to deceive, it may not be harmful, even if it could be labeled as propaganda.
• The Pareto Principle and Human Nature: Shawn introduces the Pareto Principle (the 80/20 rule), suggesting it applies to various aspects of life, including human behavior and organizational effectiveness. He even attempts to connect it to scriptural concepts like "almost all men" exercising unrighteous dominion, implying that a minority often drives the majority of outcomes, both positive and negative. While the hosts playfully debate its "doctrinal" status, the principle is explored as a potential framework for understanding distribution of effort, waste, and even spiritual progress.
• Trustees vs. Delegates in Government: The conversation shifts to the role of elected officials, specifically in the context of the Big Beautiful Bill. The hosts discuss whether representatives should act as "delegates" (reflecting the direct will of their constituents) or "trustees" (making decisions based on their own informed judgment for the perceived best interest of their constituents). Matt strongly advocates for the trustee model, especially for complex issues like the federal budget, arguing that public opinion often lacks the necessary understanding. Levi agrees, emphasizing the importance of voting for character in leaders who can navigate unforeseen crises.
• BYU Honor Code's Application: The discussion tackles the ongoing debate about the BYU Honor Code, particularly the perception that it's not applied uniformly. Matt, drawing from his experience as a YSA bishop, provides a concrete example of disparate treatment between ecclesiastical and Honor Code Office processes, even for similar infractions.
• Addressing Historical Injustice and Societal Conflict: The episode concludes with a deep dive into how to address historical injustices, using the example of a Confederate statue's relocation in North Carolina. The hosts introduce sociological theories: "functionalism" (slow, cautious change to preserve societal stability) versus "conflict theory" (highlighting existing societal conflicts to drive change, even if it causes disruption). The conversation explores the nature of "peace" in politics and whether it means the absence of conflict or actively addressing underlying issues, even if it leads to discomfort. The distinction between peaceful protest and destructive rioting is also a key point of contention.

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Homework Discussion
00:58 The Nature of Propaganda
05:54 Debating Historical Documents as Propaganda
11:49 The Pareto Principle and Its Implications
23:55 Trustees vs. Delegates in Representation
31:28 BYU Honor Code Controversy
38:31 Conflict Theory vs. Functionalism in Society

Send us a text

In this episode, Matt, Shawn, and Marc dive into some of the most pressing and thought-provoking issues of our time:

• Robert Kiyosaki's Hyperinflation Warning: We kick off by discussing "Rich Dad Poor Dad" author Robert Kiyosaki's dire predictions for the US economy, including impending hyperinflation and a financial wipeout for millions. He points to weak demand for US bonds and a Moody's downgrade as contributing factors. The hosts explore Kiyosaki's recommended solutions – investing in gold, silver, and Bitcoin – and ask the crucial questions: Are you worried about hyperinflation in the US? And what practical steps should we take to protect ourselves against economic downturns?
• The Disparate Job Market of May 2025: Next, we analyze the latest jobs numbers, revealing a mixed bag across industries. While sectors like Financial Activities and Education and Health Services boast low unemployment rates, Leisure and Hospitality, Wholesale and Retail Trade, and Information are facing significant challenges. This disparity sparks a conversation about political promises from both Biden and Trump to help everyone economically, leading to the big question: Is it truly possible for government policies to benefit all citizens, or will there always be winners and losers in the economic landscape?
• Truth and Transparency in Geopolitics: Trump, Khamenei, and Iran's Nuclear Program: The discussion then shifts to the conflicting narratives surrounding recent US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Donald Trump claims the program was "obliterated," while Ayatollah Ali Khamenei downplays the damage. This stark contrast prompts an examination of honesty in public discourse, particularly for political leaders. We ask: Does this situation underscore the critical importance of being completely honest in everything we do? And should we prioritize honesty more heavily when choosing which political leaders to support?
• Synthetic Human DNA: Playing God or Divine Inspiration? Finally, we tackle "The Big Question": a controversial project funded by the Wellcome Trust to create artificial human DNA. This groundbreaking research aims to develop treatments for incurable diseases and promote healthier aging, but it also raises profound ethical concerns about "designer babies," biological weapons, and enhanced humans. With many church members opposing stem cell research due to its embryonic origins, this new avenue presents an opportunity for genetic cures without reproductive interference. We grapple with the profound theological and ethical dilemma: Is the creation of synthetic DNA inspired by God for the benefit of humanity, or is it mankind attempting to play God?

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Upcoming Events
03:08 School Vouchers and Public Education
07:35 Concerns About Hyperinflation
13:59 Government Policies and Employment
20:30 The Role of Honesty in Politics
25:35 The Role of Honesty in Leadership
28:43 Propaganda: A Double-Edged Sword
35:11 Synthetic DNA: Playing God or Divine Inspiration?
46:44 The Future of Medicine and Ethics

Send us a text

In this episode, Matt, Shawn, and Linda dive headfirst into the swirling currents of contemporary American challenges. We'll start by grappling with Professor Marci Shore's stark warnings of civil war and her decision to leave the U.S., prompting us to question our moral obligations in a "democratic emergency." Then, we pivot to the realm of political rhetoric, dissecting Senator Mike Lee's controversial social media post and exploring the line between free speech and harmful incitement. Finally, we'll scrutinize Utah's eyebrow-raising school voucher program, examining how taxpayer money is being spent and if it truly represents the right approach to education funding. Join us as we confront these pressing issues and seek to understand their broader implications for our society.

The Big Question: In the April 2025 general conference, Elder Anderson spoke about abortion. He specifically said that what he said, "is not a political position" but "a moral law confirmed by the Lord through His prophets." Despite this, this talk is going to influence people's political positions. The question is this: how should people approach this general conference talk? If a person reads the talk and thinks about politics, are they missing out on something of greater importance than the political issue of abortion?

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Guest Introduction
02:57 Discussion on Civil War Fears in America
10:12 Understanding Democracy and Civil War Dynamics
15:53 Political Responses and Social Media Conduct
21:40 Navigating Social Media and Personal Connections
24:14 Righteous Indignation vs. Christ-like Charity
28:21 The Utah Voucher Program: A Controversial Approach
32:52 Balancing Oversight and Parental Choice in Education
41:20 Education as a Right and Public Funding
53:01 Navigating Politics and Morality in Religious Teachings

Send us a text

Join Matt, Shawn, and Melanie this week as they dive into some of the biggest ideas shaping our world, from the presence of the US military on home soil to the cutting edge of AI in dating, the public display of celebrity faith, and fundamental questions about religious freedom.

Military Visibility: A New Era?

Last Saturday, Washington D.C. hosted a military parade marking the Army's 250th anniversary. Concurrently, the Trump administration deployed the National Guard and US Marines to address civil unrest and rioting in Los Angeles. Many Americans reacted with concern to these more visible displays of military might domestically. We'll explore:

• The implications of increased military presence in US cities.
• Public perception of domestic military operations.
• The balance between security and civil liberties when US military forces are deployed internally.

AI Dating & Digital Compatibility

A brand-new dating app is revolutionizing matchmaking by analyzing your 5,000 most recent internet searches to create a "Browse personality profile." This AI-powered dating platform suggests compatible partners without even using photos. We're asking:

• Can AI algorithms predict true compatibility better than traditional profiles?
• The pros and cons of data-driven dating and privacy.
• Is sharing your internet search history the future of finding love?

Celebrity Faith & Public Reaction

Bear Grylls and Justin Bieber have both recently become more public about their Christian faith. This openness has sparked varied responses, with some accusing Justin Bieber of cult involvement. We'll discuss:

• The influence of celebrities sharing their faith.
• How public religious expression by famous figures affects individual openness.
• Navigating negative reactions to Christian faith in the public eye.

The Big Question: Oak Flat and Religious Liberty Concerns

The US Supreme Court recently allowed a lower court ruling to stand, permitting the transfer of Oak Flat, a sacred site to the Western Apache Indians, to a copper mining company. Justice Gorsuch's dissent highlighted the destruction of an ancient tribal worship site and the lack of a hearing for the Apache. This decision is widely seen as a direct assault on the religious liberties of Native Americans. We'll delve into:

• The impact of the Oak Flat decision on tribal religious rights.
• Whether a threat to the religious freedom of one group jeopardizes overall religious freedom in the United States.
• Understanding the broader implications for First Amendment rights and religious land use.

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Podcast Overview
01:57 Listener Feedback and Mission Stories Podcast
06:06 Discussion on Military Presence and Public Safety
13:25 Debate on Military Intervention in Protests
17:55 Exploring New Dating App Concepts
26:07 Celebrity Influence on Faith and Public Perception
35:17 Religious Liberty and Public Lands