On Mar. 3, Ellie Avishai hopped on a call with a senior colleague from the University of Austin in Texas. She was shocked when the colleague informed her a recent LinkedIn post of hers—an anodyne post of maybe 100 words, mostly a quotation and congratulation, which she had not given much thought to previously—had gotten her into big trouble with a university funder. In her post, which dealt with diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, she wrote that "we can have criticisms of DEI without wanting to tear down the whole concept of diversity and inclusion."

That ran contrary to some higher-ups at the university. They tore up their contract with Avishai's educational organization, the Mill Institute, severing ties with Avishai and her team the very day she got the call.

Avishai, who lives in Toronto, recently published an account of this in Quilette, which brought its own wave of flak online—did she not know the UATX, whose website says it is "dedicated to the fearless pursuit of truth," was right-wing coded? That she would have to toe a line that pleases its ideological backers? But as Avishai explains to The CJN's opinion editor, Phoebe Maltz Bovy, on The Jewish Angle, the idea of advocating a hardline political stance in a classroom is entirely antithetical to the Mill Institute's vision of education.

Credits

• Host: Phoebe Maltz Bovy
• Producer and editor: Michael Fraiman
• Music: "Gypsy Waltz" by Frank Freeman, licensed from the Independent Music Licensing Collective

Support our show

• Subscribe to The CJN newsletter
• Donate to The CJN (+ get a charitable tax receipt)
• Subscribe to The Jewish Angle

The mainstream North American Jewish Diaspora is at a crossroads. Down one path lies U.S. President Donald Trump, American Evangelicals and legacy Jewish organizations like the Anti-Defamation League and American Israel Public Affairs Committee, staunchly defending Israel to the general public; down the other, small-L liberal Jews find themselves awkwardly situated between arguing for Israel's right to exist while not endorsing the government's actions, and lacking significant fundraising capabilities to plea their case more broadly.

In some ways, this schism is reminiscent of the early days of Zionism itself, where politics and money influence public opinion and government action—and each sends followers toward starkly different outcomes. Steering the dialogue are campus protesters, like those at Columbia University, and President Trump, who uses antisemitism as a veil for deportations and crackdowns against liberal higher-education. This divide threatens to reshape the political identity of the United States, undermining its long-held commitment to liberal democracy.

That's the takeaway of a recent article, "The Coming Jewish Civil War Over Donald Trump", published in The New Republic by Eric Alterman, a distinguished professor of English and journalism at the City University of New York. Alterman joins Phoebe Maltz Bovy on The Jewish Angle to discuss this pivotal political moment and what comes next.

Credits

• Host: Phoebe Maltz Bovy
• Producer and editor: Michael Fraiman
• Music: "Gypsy Waltz" by Frank Freeman, licensed from the Independent Music Licensing Collective

Support our show

• Subscribe to The CJN newsletter
• Donate to The CJN (+ get a charitable tax receipt)
• Subscribe to The Jewish Angle

Last week, U.S. President Donald Trump tried to revoke Harvard University's ability to enroll international students—a move that was soon blocked by a federal judge. So, instead, on May 26, Trump floated the idea of taking US$3 billion of grant money, earmarked for Harvard's scientific and engineering research deemed of national importance, and rerouting it to trade schools.

Nevermind the logistics—the Republican president has waged an all-out war on Ivy League education, and Jews are, once again, caught in the middle. The head of the Department of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, has said the White House is "holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus."

But if you ask American Jewish academics, they'll tell you the "fighting antisemitism" argument is a smokescreen to advance a different political agenda. "I don't think the Trump administration's response to it is anything other than a fig leaf for its attempt to crack down on the university writ large," says David Schraub, an associate professor at the Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon, on this week's episode of The Jewish Angle. "We see that because when antisemitism, for whatever reason, isn't available to them as a talking point on the given campus, they just switch to something else. The consistent point is the crackdown, and the justification comes and goes."

Listen to this week's episode for more on how Jews are finding themselves used as pawns in a wider political struggle on modern American campuses.

Credits

• Host: Phoebe Maltz Bovy
• Producer and editor: Michael Fraiman
• Music: "Gypsy Waltz" by Frank Freeman, licensed from the Independent Music Licensing Collective

Support our show

• Subscribe to The CJN newsletter
• Donate to The CJN (+ get a charitable tax receipt)
• Subscribe to The Jewish Angle