Couples arrive having already done the math. Ninety percent of this is good, they tell me. It's the sex. Fix the sex. Then I ask how much of an ordinary day sex actually occupies, and the arithmetic falls apart — because the thing they came to change isn't ten or twenty percent of the relationship. It's an order of magnitude. And what I'm about to ask of them is enormous.

This week, Dr. Alivia Stehlik and I get there by way of a business book I refused to read for a year. 10x Is Easier Than 2x, by Dan Sullivan and Dr. Benjamin Hardy — a title I assumed belonged to the stacks-of-cash genre, until I found Viktor Frankl quoted in the opening pages. The premise turns out not to be about quantity at all. 10x is a category change: when you learn to read or learn to drive, you become someone who was not there before. The mechanism is that roughly twenty percent of what you do generates the value, and the other eighty percent is safe, functional, and the exact reason nothing is moving.

Run that relationally and it gets uncomfortable fast. People come in believing the problem is narrow and contained, and discover they have to reinvent most of themselves.

We get into the conditions that make desire possible long before anyone reaches for anyone — including an argument about coffee that I have finally, after years, lost. Alivia's position is that a Chemex and a hand grinder produce something automation cannot, that intention gets imbued in the making, and that this is sex. Mine was that setting the machine the night before meant my coffee was ready when I woke up. It didn't really matter how good it was. When the Chemex broke, I made her replace it. She was right. From there: the inventory exercise, widening the aperture on what your whole life is doing to the relationship you say you want, and a revision of a line everyone knows. The familiar version is what got you here won't get you there. The book's version goes further: what got you here will keep you here.

What got you here was remarkable. It built the beautiful life you have. So what happens when it's also the thing holding you in place?

Full Show Notes

Made possible in part by Nine to Kind Planners — use code EMMA20 for 20% off.

Send us a comment: Comment Form

Reignite Desire Masterclass waitlist - Aug 14

Thirty episodes in, Dr. Emma Smith and Dr. Alivia Stehlik set out to finish last week's conversation on flow state — and abandoned the outline for a motorcycle instead.

Flow state, borrowed from research done mostly on athletes, turns out to have less to do with maximum effort than with sustained, active presence: the place where challenge and skill meet and time stops behaving. On a motorcycle, that presence isn't optional. You feel every mile — the temperature, the grit, the shift in the air — because there is no passive version of riding. And that, it turns out, is the better analogy for a relationship than the one our culture sells us. You don't climb onto the back of a bike with a stranger the way you climb into a car. You do it blind, trusting the person in front of you completely, on a machine that only stays safe and alive while both people keep it that way.

Emma tells the story of getting her license at forty, meeting her own fear on the road, and finding real flow only as a passenger — because trust let her hand the experience over. Along the way: why vulnerability is a literal dropping of armor, why co-creation means matched risk, and why, as Robert Pirsig would have it, quality is never passive.

Performance is next week. This week, the question stays open.

Full Show Notes

Made possible in part by Nine to Kind Planners — use code EMMA20 for 20% off.

Send us a comment: Comment Form

Reignite Desire Masterclass waitlist - Aug 14

Somewhere between the wedding and an ordinary Tuesday, most of us picked up a rule we never agreed to: arrive, and the story is finished. This week, Dr. Alivia returns to take that rule apart — using flow state research, a Christian Bale racing film, and the shape of a twisted necklace chain.

Flow lives in a narrow band, where challenge and skill sit close enough that you stay engaged without tipping into anxiety or coasting into boredom — and, as Dr. Emma and Dr. Alivia point out, it never lives past the edge, in the gritted-teeth effort our culture tends to romanticize. Applied to relationships, that band starts to look a lot like presence: active, ongoing, re-entered rather than arrived at.

The episode's central image comes from the movie Ford v Ferrari — a driver wins, technically loses on a ruling, and responds, "you promised me the race, not the win." Even our wedding vows already knew this. In sickness and in health was never a footnote to the fairy tale; it was the fairy tale, unglamorized.

From there, the conversation moves into attachment as something built continuously rather than achieved once — closer to a Möbius strip than a finish line — and closes with a less comfortable question pulled from Dr. Emma's current stack of sex toy symposium submissions: when does a tool sharpen the encounter between two people, and when does it slip into becoming the third "entity" in the room?

This one is for anyone who has caught themselves treating a relationship like a completed project, or who has said "we're fine, we just don't really reach for each other anymore" more than once this year.

Full Show Notes

Made possible in part by Nine to Kind Planners — use code EMMA20 for 20% off.

Send us a comment: Comment Form

Reignite Desire Masterclass waitlist - Aug 14