エピソード

  • Green Planet Monitor Podcast
    2023/07/09
    GPM # 18 It’s neither a drunkard’s dream nor a woolly Socialist notion: a universal basic income, guaranteed for a nation’s citizens – perhaps residents too – in return for … nothing. Just to get by. No far-fetched idea, the Universal Basic Income (UBI) concept is endorsed by the World Bank. The universal basic income concept “holds an attractive promise of change across many lines,” the World Bank stated in a 2020 report. “These include coverage potential, fairness in social contracts, power relations in labor markets, and gender equity.” Just two countries have implemented UBI systems, for limited periods – the Islamic Republic of Iran and Mongolia. Among the longest standing and most successful guaranteed income systems — the Alaska Permanent Fund. In the UK, a group of social entrepreneurs are preparing to launch their own locally-led pilot study to see how UBI systems play out on the ground, in people’s lives. It will be a community-driven project. Two communities have been selected to participate: the Grange area of East Finchley, in north London, and the South Tyneside town of Jarrow. Jarrow residents have good reason to be interested in the Universal Basic Income pilot project. In October 1936, two hundred men marched from Jarrow to London to protest unemployment. Cleo Goodman leads the UBI pilot project, currently in the scoping, community-consultation and fundraising stage. Goodman co-founded the Basic Income Conversation project in 2019, based at a think tank called Autonomy, that specializes in the future of work. I reached Cleo Goodman in Edinburgh. Listen to our conversation in today’s podcast. Click on the podcast link above, or go here. Jarrow “Crusaders” set off for London in October 1936 to protest unemployment. The Biden Administration has just announced it plans to provide cluster munitions to Ukraine. Ukrainian forces seem to be bogged down in their struggle against the Russians. As both sides slaughter each other, Washington reckons cluster bombs have something positive to contribute in its proxy war with Russia. Russia has also reportedly used cluster munitions in its invasion of Ukraine. Human rights groups have condemned the idea of sending cluster munitions to Ukraine. Several EU/NATO member states have voiced concern. Cluster munitions release scores of little bomblets that fly through the air and bounce around, slicing and dicing human flesh. Many of them don’t explode, littering the landscape with munitions that continue to kill for years, especially kids. As Europe’s bloodiest conflict since World War Two drags on, thoughts turn to the First World War – the one that was supposed to end all wars. On August 4, 1914 – 109 years ago — Germany invaded little Belgium. Three weeks later, in an orgy of destruction, German troops laid seven Belgian towns to waste. The “Martyr Cities,” they came to be called. Leuven (Louvain, in French) was one of them. Of all the acts committed by German troops in Leuven in August 1914, none sparked more international outrage than the destruction of Leuven university library, a treasure trove of European literature and art, torched by the Germans on the night of August 25, 1914. Here’s a story I produced on the hundredth anniversary of that dreadful event – an event elderly residents of Leuven remember. Click on the podcast link above, or go here. Mark Deretz, Leuven University archivist, beside carbonized remains of old library. (David Kattenburg) It’s something human beings take for granted: the World is a very human place — covered by concrete and tall buildings; cars racing this way and that; food from all corners of the planet. Some green space — for us humans. Earth’s human age has a name – the Anthropocene. Dutch chemist Paul Crützen coined it, twenty years ago. The Anthropocene, Crützen said, should be declared a new ‘Epoch’ in Earth history, terminating the one we’ve been in for the past 12,000 years, the Holocene. Some time this summer, a panel of scientists — the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) — will move Crützen’s idea up a notch, with a proposal of their own on how Earth’s human age should be defined – geologically. [Editor’s note: This happened on Tuesday, July 11. Read about it here]. Paul Crützen’s original idea was that the Anthropocene began with the 18th century Industrial Revolution. In 2019 — a decade of research under its belt — the AWG decided it actually began around 1950, at the start of the “Great Acceleration’, when the scale, scope and pace of humanity’s impact on Planet Earth started to skyrocket. American environmental historian John McNeill, a colleague of Crutzen’s, had come up with the term in 2005, inspired by a 1944 work by Hungarian economist Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. McNeill’s idea would be corroborated by a set of ‘Great Acceleration curves’, or ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    59 分
  • Green Planet Monitor Podcast
    2023/07/17
    GPM # 19 Planet Earth. We humans tend to think of it as ours, to do with as we please. Over the past two centuries, that’s exactly what humans have done. Humanity’s transformation of Earth’s atmosphere, land surface and oceans has a name – the Anthropocene. Dutch chemist Paul Crützen and American biologist Eugene Stoermer coined the term a quarter century ago. Last week, at a geology conference in Lille, France, a scientific panel presented their formal definition of the Anthropocene — when it began, how it should be ranked in the official geological time scale and where human impacts are best observed in the rock record. The panel’s proposed location — a little lake in southern Ontario. To be more precise, the Anthropocene Working Group’s proposed ‘reference standard’ or prototype for the base of a new Earth stage/age and epoch/series is a 2-centimeter segment of a sedimentary core pulled from the bottom of Crawford Lake, in Milton, Ontario, an hour’s drive west of Toronto. Crawford Lake sediments, as it happens, have been studied for years. Back in the 1970’s, palynologists pinpointed corn pollen there, dating to the 14th and 15th centuries, the legacy of indigenous people who lived along the lake’s shores, cultivating their Three Sisters — corn, beans and squash. Above those corn pollen grains, in layers (varves) laid down in the mid-20th century, Anthropocene researchers have pinpointed the fingerprints of less benign human activity — spheroidal carbonaceous particles from high-temperature coal burning and radioactive plutonium from thermonuclear weapons tests that peaked in the mid-1950s. That distinct layer is now being put forward as the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP), marking the base of the Crawfordian stage/age, and a brand new Epoch/series – the Anthropocene — thereby terminating the one we’ve been in for the past 12,000 years, the Holocene. The more popular name for a GSSP – a ‘Golden Spike’. This past Tuesday, at the 4th International Congress of the International Commission on Stratigraphy, in the northern French city of Lille, two members of the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) presented their results. The geological definition the AWG is now proposing – centering on the Crawford Lake GSSP — will need to be ratified by the body that commissioned it, the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy. If that happens, the proposal will move up to the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), then to the supreme arbiter of all matters geological, the International Union of Geological Sciences. At each stage, supermajority approval will be required. The proposal’s future is anything but certain. If it manages to climb to the pinnacle of the geo-bureaucratic hierarchy, ratification or rejection could be announced in August 2024, at the 37th congress of the International Union of Geological Sciences, in Busan, South Korea. If the IUGS ratifies the Anthropocene as a new Epoch, terminating the Holocene, it will be a momentous event. Never before have geologists announced the start of a new Epoch in their own life times – one caused by humans themselves. Crawford Lake’s selection as the proposed Anthropocene’s ‘Golden Spike’ culminates years of analysis. Twelve candidate GSSPs were originally put forward, from locations around the planet. This was narrowed down to nine, of which four received votes in various voting rounds. Full details on the nine sites can be found here. A great read. Listen to the AWG’s Anthropocene announcement in this podcast edition. Click on the button on top, or go here. Colin Waters, chair of the AWG, is the first you’ll hear. Francine McCarthy follows. McCarthy is a geologist at Brock University, and the scientific director of Team Crawford. This is technical stuff. Listen closely. Colin Waters, Francine McCarthy and Martin Head outside the STRATI 2023 conference in Lille (David Kattenburg) Last week’s announcement of a proposed definition of the Anthropocene may come as a surprise to some. Aren’t we already in the Anthropocene, ordinary people ask? Not according to those who govern Earth’s official time scale — the International Chronostratigraphic Time Chart. Judging from the public comments of ranking geologists, the AWG’s proposed formal definition, announced last week in the French city of Lille, may well wither on the geo-bureaucratic vine. Further indication of which way the wind blows was on display at the International Commission of Stratigraphy’s conference in Lille, last week. After having suggested that the AWG’s proposed definition of the Anthropocene and its candidate Golden Spike could be publicly announced at the conference, organizers did a volte-face. Crawford Lake findings could be presented to stratigraphers by AWG chair Colin Waters and Crawford Lake researcher Francine McCarthy, they said — as planned — but media would not be welcome. Certainly not ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    58 分
  • Green Planet Monitor Podcast
    2023/07/23
    GPM # 20 In a recent appeal to the world, Canadian AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton and 180 other leading scientists and luminaries issued a warning about the existential threats to humanity posed by … not climate change, not the demise of Earth’s biosphere … but artificial intelligence. “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI,” their statement reads, “should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.” According to other AI practitioners and observers, the prospects of human extinction at the hands of self-reproducing, self-defending generative AI systems and autonomous killer robots are overblown. The scariest things about AI – they warn — are much more mundane. “Big data increases inequality and threatens democracy,” Cathy O’Neil wrote in her 2016 work, Weapons of Math Destruction. Then there’s AI’s carbon footprint. According to a 2019 report in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Technology Review magazine, cloud computing is responsible for two percent of global greenhouse gas emissions — a larger carbon footprint than the global airline industry. According to a more recent report, ‘training’ a single AI model consumes more energy than a hundred American households. The GPM spoke with Dylan Baker, a research engineer at the Distributed AI Research Institute. Listen to our conversation in today’s podcast. Click on the audio box on top, or go here. Ever wonder what secrets lurk within your personal genetic source code? How much DNA did you inherit from Neanderthals? Perhaps you’re the proud owner of a sports gene! Hopefully no skeletons in the closet – like the Alzheimer’s allele. Would you want to know? If so, consumer genome kits can oblige, in exchange for a bit of spit. Listen to this story in today’s podcast, produced in 2013. Click on the audio box on top, or go here. Update: The US FDA warned 23andMe about marketing health predictive genome testing in 2013. In 2017, the FDA authorized it to market Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s and Hereditary Thrombophilia risk reports. As for National Geographic’s Geno Kits, the Society stopped marketing these in 2019. National Geographic says, at its website, that it deleted or destroyed DNA data in June 2020, with the exception of info from users who consented to their use for population-related research. UBC Professor Rosie Redfield checks her genome test results (David Kattenburg) Their precise scientific name is a mouthful. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. But you don’t want to get them in your mouth. Hard to avoid. Forever chemicals are in non-stick cookware; greasy food wrap; microwave popcorn bags … even lipstick. They don’t break down, they build up in your body, and they’re very bad for your health. And, most people have them in their blood! A recent mapping study reports that PFASs are present at high concentrations in thousands of spots across the UK and Europe. A similar exercise was carried out in the US. Now, a scientific study from California reports nine compounds in the blood of pregnant women and umbilical cords. Jessica Trowbridge is the study’s lead author. Trowbridge is a research scientist in the Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment at the University of California, San Francisco. Here’s more about the program’s research. Listen to our conversation in today’s podcast. Click on the audio box on top, or go here. Thanks to Dan Weisenberger for his wonderful guitar instrumentals.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    59 分
  • Green Planet Monitor Podcast
    2023/07/30
    GPM # 21 You are what you eat, so they say. As it happens, the trillions of bacteria inhabiting your intestinal tract eat what you eat, turning meals into molecules that affect your gut, immune system and mind. The brain and nervous system, in turn, seem to be able to scan and modulate your gut microbiome. Premek Bercik and his colleagues untangle the mysteries of this bi-directional relationship. Bercik — a Professor in the Division of Gastroenterology and member of the Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute at McMaster University, in Hamilton, Ontario — studies gut disorders such as Celiac disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), and the links between gut bacteria, bowel inflammation and affective disorders such as depression and anxiety. Listen to the GPM‘s conversation with Premek in today’s podcast. Click on the button above or go here. Gut bacteria have numerous tricks up their sleeves. Virtuosic metabolisers of the meat, carbs, fiber and fats we feed them, those bacteria generate molecules that modulate our immune system, stimulate neurons in the walls of our intestinal tract or travel straight to mood centres in our brain. Among these, neurotransmitters such as serotonin and histamine. Bacteria also stimulate the vagus nerve, the longest nerve in the body, connecting the brain stem and the walls of the gut. The beneficial effects of bacterial supplements (probiotics) may be mediated by the vagus. In return, the vagus seems to affect gut microbes, scanning those bugs and modifying the composition of bacterial populations. Not surprisingly, the gut microbiome is affected by emotional stress. Much of what we know about the gut-brain axis has been established in experiments on germ-free mice. Inoculated with stool samples from people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), germ-free mice exhibit negative shifts in their own bowel behaviour. Inoculated with gut samples from people with mood disorders, germ-free mice exhibit their own behavioural shifts. Drilling down into the mysteries of human gut physiology, Premek Bercik and his team have studied specific strains of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ bacteria. In the former category, Bifidobacterium longum is a well known probiotic. B. longum NCC3001 reduces patient depression scores and improves gut symptoms, Bercik and his colleagues have found. It also shifts neural activity in brain regions known to be targeted by antidepressants, such as the hippocampus and amygdala. And, B. longum raises levels of a molecule called brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus of mice. Then there’s a known intestinal ‘bad guy’, Klebsiella aerogenes. Certain strains possess an enzyme that converts the amino acid histidine — found in dietary protein — into the inflammatory and pain mediator, histamine. That histamine crosses the intestinal barrier, where it stimulates mast cells, a type of white blood cell. They, in turn, secrete even more histamine. Consistent with this scenario, people with IBS tend to secrete elevated levels of histamine in their urine. And, decreased consumption of certain types of fermentable fiber (which, when digested by bacteria, create optimal metabolic conditions for bacterial histamine production) leads to lower urinary histamine and pain relief. Listen to our conversation with Premek in today’s podcast. Click on the button above or go here. Land of a Thousand Hills (David Kattenburg) The 29th anniversary of Rwanda’s 1994 genocide has just come to a close. Over the course of those awful hundred days, between April 7 and July 15, 1994, an estimated eight hundred thousand ethnic Tutsis and a lesser number of their Hutu neighbors were brutally killed by Hutu extremists armed with knives, hoes and machetes. Over the airwaves, venom flowed. Announcers at Radio-Télévision Mille Collines (from Rwanda’s popular nickname, the ‘Land of a Thousand Hills’), urged listeners to “kill the cockroaches.” RTLM chiefs distributed cheap pocket radios to stoke the furnace of ethnic hatred. Established in July 1993 by Hutu extremists “to create harmonious development in Rwandan society,” it became the genocide’s key driving force, mobilizing grassroots members of the notorious Interahamwe militia. This documentary was produced in 2009. All the people you hear have moved on. ‘Gacaca’ courts ended in 2012. Radio Izuba continues to broadcast in Kibungo, eastern Rwanda. Listen to the story in today’s podcast. Click on the button above or go here. They’re all the rage. Drones. Every country wants them, packed with sensors, cameras and missiles. Small ones that loiter, drop tear gas or bombs, or crash with a big bang, in kamikaze fashion; big ones that fire missiles, blowing up cars, buildings and people to bits. All on command from control rooms hundreds, if not thousands of kilometers away. Now, Canada is in the market for a fleet of its own. Hellfire missiles and laser guided bombs may be on its ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    59 分
  • Little Boy and Fat Man
    2023/08/04
    GPM # 22 Seventy-eight years ago, on August 6, 1945, the US dropped a uranium-enriched fission bomb, code named ‘Little Boy’, on the Japanese port city, Hiroshima. Three days later, they dropped a second bomb, a plutonium-implosion device — Fat Man — on Nagasaki. When the dust settled, between 130 and 225,000 people were dead or dying. To this day, casualty numbers vary widely. One thing is clear: almost all were civilians. Thousands more would sicken and die in the years to come. America’s public rationale for its nuclear bombing of Japan: avoiding the huge casualties that would supposedly have resulted from putting boots on Japanese soil. Other, more cynical reasons would emerge in time. Here’s a story about America’s development of Little Boy and Fat Man, adapted from a documentary produced by Clive Baugh, Ed Reece and David Kattenburg back in 1986. It takes its name from a prose-poem by the American Trappist monk, theologian, mystic and writer Thomas Merton. The story features interviews with German-American nuclear physicist Hans Bethe, head of the theoretical physics division of the Los Alamos Laboratory, where America’s first nuclear ‘device’, Trinity, was developed, and the winner of the 1967 Nobel Prize in Physics. We interviewed Bethe in his office at Cornell University, in Ithaca, New York. A memorable conversation. You’ll also hear Martin Johns, late Professor Emeritus of physics at McMaster University, in Hamilton, Ontario, and researcher at Canada’s Chalk River nuclear facility. Johns joined the McMaster faculty in 1947, and helped manage its small experimental particle accelerator. He shares the history of Canada’s involvement in the development of America’s nuclear bombs (Canada was indeed involved. Listen to Hans Bethe). And Rosalie Bertell, late anti-nuclear campaigner and authority on the health effects of ionizing radiation. Bertell was a sister of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart, and author of the 1985 work No Immediate Danger – Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth. She won the 1986 Right Livelihood Award — the ‘Alternative Nobel Prize’ — for “raising public awareness about the destruction of the biosphere and human gene pool, especially by low-level radiation.” Thanks to Brenda Muller for her cello and Michael J. Birthelmer for his guitar. And to the Firesign Theatre, America’s counterculture comics. Listen to this story in today’s podcast. Click on the play button above, or go here. Bikini Island, the atoll’s largest island, at sunset (David Kattenburg) Almost eighty years after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the real reasons for America’s hideous assault have been unearthed by a small army of scholars. Among these – Glenn Alcalay. Alcalay is an Associate Professor of Anthropology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, at City University of New York. Back in the mid-1970s, Alcalay spent two years as a Peace Corps volunteer in the Marshall Islands, just north of the equator, in the Central Pacific. The US carried out 67 nuclear tests there, between 1946 and 1958. The biggest was Bravo, its first deliverable hydrogen bomb, detonated at Bikini Atoll, in the central Marshalls, on March 1, 1954. Alcalay spent those two years on a small atoll downwind from Bikini. Inspired by that experience, he began researching the impacts of US weapons testing on the Marshallese people — and the true history of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The stuff you won’t learn about from the blockbuster film, Oppenheimer. Read this recent piece by Glenn Alcalay. And listen to our complete conversation here: Old observation tower pad on Bikini Island (David Kattenburg) It’s a sobering truth that few know. Having dropped those two bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, eighty years ago, America would probably not have consolidated its status as the most powerful nation in the world had it not been for a string of atolls in the central Pacific, and the hospitable islanders who let it test its arsenal there. They didn’t have much choice. America tested its first bomb, Trinity, in Alamogordo, New Mexico. It dropped its second and third bombs on Japan. A year later — having been handed the Marshall Islands as a Strategic Trust by the UN — the US set out to use it as the testing ground for its now burgeoning nuclear arsenal. In July 1946, the US set off Able and Baker at Bikini Atoll, in the central Marshalls. Twenty-one more atomic and thermonuclear tests would follow, including the leviathan, 15-megatonne Bravo blast, on March 1, 1954. Forty-four bombs were tested at Eniwetok atoll, in the northern Marshalls. Read a detailed account of the history of the Marshall Islands here, written back in 2007. Nothing much has changed since then. Bikini is still contaminated, and has not been resettled. Radiation monitoring continues, under the aegis of the US Department of Energy. Health impact claims adjudicated and awarded by the now defunct Nuclear Claims ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • No Immediate Danger
    2023/08/13
    GPM # 23 Seventy-eight years ago, on August 6, 1945, the US dropped a uranium-enriched fission bomb – ‘Little Boy’ – on the Japanese port city, Hiroshima. Three days later, anxious to test their second innovative device before the war ended, they detonated a second bomb — a plutonium-triggered implosion device called Fat Man — over Nagasaki. Why Nagasaki? Because Nagasaki lay in a bowl, surrounded by hills nuclear scientists figured would reflect neutrons. They wanted to check that out (listen to Glenn Alcalay here). When the dust settled, a couple hundred thousand lay dead or dying. Most were civilians. Thousands more would sicken and die in the years to come. America’s official rationale for dropping bombs on Japan: avoiding huge casualties a ground invasion of Japan would supposedly have incurred. Harry Truman’s non-mea culpa was immediately accepted by the American media and public. The real reason would emerge in time: one-upping the Soviets, setting the stage for global supremacy, with the bomb as gold standard. Gar Alperovitz has written a pair of books about the nuclear bombing of Japan. Alperovitz is a historian, political economist, activist and writer, and the author of two books about the nuclear bombing of Japan. Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam was published in 1965. His 1995 work, The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the Architecture of an American Myth, updated the story. Alperovitz is also the co-founder of something called the Democracy Collaborative, a research centre on ecologically sustainable, community-based economics, and the Next System Project. Listen to my conversation with Gar Alperovitz. Click on the play button on top, or go here. ‘Bravo Shot’ over Bikini atoll, the Marshall Islands, March 1, 1954 Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just the start. Building bombs would become a booming business for America and the other four ‘Permanent Members’ of the United Nations (the ones franchised to possess nuclear weapons and to threaten their use), Russia, China, the UK and France. Nuclearism was a bonanza for the ‘Military-Industrial Complex’ of course, and for the Pentagon too. Each military service hustled for its own nukes. The Air Force had dropped their first two on Japan. Soon, the army had a growing arsenal of its own, mounted on missiles. So did the navy, to detonate at or below the surface of bodies of water. Hungry for their slices of protection, prestige and power, a half dozen other countries developed smaller but equally deadly arsenals. Here’s a great song about that. In the fields of the bomb, there was no shortage of profits to go around — digging up uranium in desolate, underdeveloped areas of the world inhabited by disenfranchised indigenous people; enriching it; selling it; designing warheads of the latest sort; testing nukes in the atmosphere or just below ground, spreading radionuclides all around the planet. Power plants put the peaceful atom to work. Their radioactive wastes got dumped in the seas, buried or processed into fertilizer to be spread on farm fields. Plutonium from spent fuel rods would be enriched and packed into warheads. Untold numbers of nuclear workers and innocent bystanders would die in the course of all this atomic industriousness, especially islanders and other First Nations people. Tens of millions more would perish (and continue to do so) in wars fought or engineered by the possessors of the ultimate weapon — the weapon that determines who wields bona fide power and who doesn’t. This is something I produced back in 1986. In order of appearance: Rosalie Bertell was a Canadian-American anti-nuclear activist and authority on the health effects of ionizing radiation. Bertell, a sister of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart, founded the International Institute of Concern for Public Health, in Toronto. Her book — No Immediate Danger – Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth — was published in 1985. In 1986, Bertell received the Right Livelihood Award, known as the alternative Nobel Prize. Rosalie Bertell passed away in 2012. You’ll also hear two voices recorded at the ‘Crimes of the Official Terror Network Tribunal’, a four-day popular summit organized by the Alliance for Non-Violent Action, in Toronto, in June 1988: Al Draper, a Royal Canadian Air Force serviceman, was one of many US and Canadian servicemen recruited to observe US nuclear bomb tests in the Nevada desert, to see how it affected them. Ward Churchill was a professor at the University of Colorado at the time of this recording, and an activist with the American Indian Movement (AIM). Donna Smyth was an English professor at Acadia University, in Wolfville, Nova Scotia, and an anti-uranium mining activist. Smyth’s 1986 work, Subversive Elements — drawing on her experience opposing uranium mining in Nova Scotia in the early 1980s — was described at the time as “a multi-generic, postmodern, ecofeminist, Maritime novel.” Thanks to ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    59 分
  • Poisonous Legacies
    2023/08/20
    GPM # 24 The mining, milling, processing and enrichment of uranium for use in nuclear bombs, the testing of those bombs, their actual or threatened use against people, the use of uranium in power reactors and the extraction of weapons-grade plutonium from those reactors has poisoned relations between states, polluted environments, stunted First Nations societies, sickened and killed countless millions and alienated humans from the rest of the living world. Consider little Niger. The north African nation is the world’s seventh largest uranium producer. Massive volumes of uranium ore have been extracted over decades from an open pit mine operated by the state-owned French company, Orano, in the northern Nigerien town of Arlit, and from an underground mine nearby. Niger’s minority stake in Orano’s operations likely provides its military with a healthy income – certainly with a quantum of power when dealing with the French, who they claim to hate, and whose military they’ve reportedly expelled. Ordinary Nigeriens get poisonous mine tailings, polluted air and water and radioactive buildings. I speak about uranium mining in Niger with Bruno Chareyron, a researcher with the French NGO CRIIRAD (Commission de Recherche et d’Information Indépendentes Sur la Radioactivité). Listen to our conversation. Click on the link above or go here. Courtesy: Aghirin’man While Nigeriens cope with the radioactive legacy of uranium mining, eleven thousand kilometers to the east, Vietnam continues to confront the toxic legacy of what they call the American War. Between 1961 and 1971, in an attempt to eliminate forest cover and food supplies for North Vietnamese forces, the US Air Force dropped an estimated seventy-five million liters of the defoliant Agent Orange across the southern end of what was then South Vietnam. Almost 30,000 square kilometers of forest and some 5 million acres of farmland got drenched. So did lots of Vietnamese soldiers and peasant farmers. Agent Orange is a mixture of the herbicides 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D. Within that ugly brew, traces of dioxin – a toxic chlorinated organic compound that persists in soils and sediments, and accumulates in fish that people eat. Up to four million Vietnamese were exposed to America’s toxic defoliant. To this day, dioxin ‘hot spots’continue to be cleaned up. There were initially four of these across southern Vietnam: former US airbases at Danang, Bien Hoa and Phu Cat, where Agent Orange was stored in drums and loaded onto planes, and sections of the A Luoi Valley, near the border with Laos. Cleanup at Danang was completed in 2018. In late 2022, the US government allocated $29 million to remediate a mess four times that size, at Bien Hoa. The whole job is expected to cost a half-billion and take a decade to complete. Meanwhile, in the minds of many Vietnamese (and American experts), the health effects of the American War have transcended generations. These include a host of cancers, Vietnamese health authorities insist, and the most shocking birth defects. Of course, American servicemen and women were exposed too. Read about that here. Listen to this story about the legacy of Agent Orange in Vietnam. Click on the link above or go here. A Luoi valley, near Vietnam’s border with Laos (David Kattenburg) Human beings have transformed Planet Earth’s surface — geologically. Dutch Chemist Paul Crützen captured this idea in a single word: the Anthropocene. This past July, in Lille, France, a scientific panel announced its own definition of the Anthropocene: when it began; how Earth’s new time unit should be ranked in the geological time scale, and where humanity’s overwhelming impact is best observed in Earth’s sediments, as a reference standard for other spots of the same age around the world. The panel’s choice for that one spot: Crawford Lake, in southern Ontario. It’s key human ‘signature’ of humanity’s presence: radioactive plutonium from atmospheric thermonuclear tests that peaked in the mid-1950s. The panel will present a detailed proposal to the body that commissioned it, this coming Fall. Crawford Lake core (courtesy: Patterson lab) Jan Zalasiewicz was the first chair of the Anthropocene Working Group. Zalasiewicz is an Emeritus Professor of Palaeobiology at the University of Leicester and a member of the Anthropocene Working Group. Listen to our conversation. Click on the link above or go here. Thanks to Dan Weisenberger for his wonderful guitar instrumentals.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    59 分
  • Bosses Old & New
    2023/08/27
    GPM # 25 Senegal, on the western edge of Africa, has long been considered an anchor of stability. Today, tension fills the air. Senegalese opposition leader Ousmane Sonko, a would-be presidential candidate, is on life support following a three-week hunger strike, protesting his house arrest. Sonko supporters say he’s been targeted because he wants to change Senegal’s relationship with France, which many see as neocolonial. It’s a common theme across West Africa today, where the economic legacy of colonialism is a daily reality. Over a century ago, France banned the use of the cowrie shell as an exchange currency, imposing its own – the CFA . The meaning of the term has changed over the years. Between 1945 and 1958, CFA stood for Colonies Françaises d’Afrique — French colonies of Africa. Then French Community of Africa. Since the early 1960s, when Senegal and France’s other North African colonies became independent, the CFA has been taken to mean African Financial Community. Backed by the French treasury, the CFA is pegged to the Euro, and France enjoys a huge trade advantage. Inflation – and the dependency of France’s former colonies on imported commodities – fuel staggering poverty. Also violent extremism. Most of the coups in the Sahel over the past decade have been in former French colonies. Berlin-based journalist and correspondent Alexa Dvorson has lived and worked in Senegal. During her most recent trip, in 2022, Senegal won the Africa Cup of Nations football tournament for the first time, defeating Egypt on penalties. Euphoria – and hope for the future – filled the air. It didn’t last long. Here is her report from that trip to the Senegalese capital Dakar, on the Atlantic Ocean, Africa’s western tip. Listen to Alexa’s story. Click on the podcast button above, or go here. Dakar market (Alexa Dvorson) For those who don’t know a whole lot about global politics and international affairs, Canada is seen as a kinder, gentler, more enlightened country than its neighbor to the south – with a young, photogenic leader always talking about human rights, justice and international law. Yves Engler sees things very differently. Engler is a Montreal-based writer and political activist. His 2009 book, The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy, was short-listed for the Quebec Writers Federation’s Mavis Gallant Prize for Nonfiction. His most recent work, Stand on Guard For Whom? A People’s History of the Canadian Military, was co-published last year by Black Rose Books and Red Publishing. Listen to our conversation with Yves Engler. Click on the podcast button above, or go here. Yves Engler Last week, one of the world’s longest ruling strongmen finally stepped aside — handing power to his son. Hun Sen has had a long and colourful career. During the Cambodian civil war, between 1975 and 1979, he served as a commander for the Khmer Rouge. Following his defection to Vietnam in 1977, and the downfall of the Khmer Rouge, he became Cambodia’s Foreign Minister in the Vietnamese occupation government, then Prime Minister in 1983. On August 22, Hun Sen finally stepped aside, handing the Prime Minister post to his 45 year-old son, Hun Manet. The move was rubber-stamped by the Cambodian Parliament, controlled by the Cambodian People’s Party, that Hun Sen continues to lead. Not much is known about Hun Manet, other than his military pedigree. Since graduating from West Point, he’s been Cambodia’s counter-terrorism chief and a deputy military commander. Western observers wonder if he’ll govern with a more liberal touch than his father, and whether Cambodian relations with China will continue to prosper. Washington is reportedly upset by Chinese plans to help develop Cambodia’s naval base in Ream, on the Gulf of Thailand. Cambodia mangrove forest (David Kattenburg) The fate of mangrove forests up the coast from Ream is likely not on the Biden Administration’s radar. Coastal mangroves are threatened all around the world. In Cambodia, they’ve been cut down for charcoal and replaced by shrimp farms. Government figures, military chiefs and their rich clients have had a hand in this for years. Their involvement in mangrove destruction, coastal sand dredging and the harvesting of upland timber species, for sale in Thailand, Vietnam and China, is well documented. Read this and this. Here’s a story I produced about this, back in 2008. Click on the podcast button on top, or go here. Cambodian village in the middle of the mangroves (David Kattenburg) Thanks to Dan Weisenberger for his guitar instrumentals.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    52 分