『The Gesamtschau (English)』のカバーアート

The Gesamtschau (English)

The Gesamtschau (English)

著者: Alex Markowetz
無料で聴く

今ならプレミアムプランが3カ月 月額99円

2026年5月12日まで。4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。

概要

Alexander Markowetz analyses digital transformation and its societal consequences. The coming digitalisation constitutes the greatest revolution in human history — existing 19th-century structures will not survive this transformation.Alex Markowetz 社会科学
エピソード
  • Intellectual Anti-Patterns: The Thinking Traps That Block the Future
    2026/04/08
    Intellectual Anti-Patterns: The Thinking Traps That Block the Future Before any serious conversation about the future can happen, the intellectual ground needs to be cleared. This episode identifies the recurring mental models and explanatory frameworks that sound plausible at first but consistently lead nowhere — what in software development would be called anti-patterns. From culturalist explanations for economic differences to the reflexive dismissal of entire thinkers based on a single flaw, these patterns waste time and foreclose the very questions worth asking. The episode also addresses subtler traps: the mistake of extrapolating trends linearly without understanding underlying structural forces, the confusion of the last 25 years of proto-digitalization with digitalization itself, and the appeal of vague, esoteric language as a substitute for following causal chains to their uncomfortable conclusions. The through-line is practical — anyone making decisions today, whether as a parent, an entrepreneur, or a policymaker, is effectively deciding for a world roughly twenty years out. That world will not resemble the present one. Simply observing what exists is not enough. Key topics: - Anti-patterns borrowed from software development as a framework for identifying flawed modes of thinking about the future - Why culturalist and quasi-biological explanations for macroeconomic differences are intellectually indefensible - The limits of quantitative forecasting and why fundamental analysis is necessary for long-horizon thinking - Proto-digitalization versus full digitalization: why the last 25 years are not a reliable guide to what comes next - Why decisions made today are effectively decisions for a world that first has to be imagined, not observed
    続きを読む 一部表示
    22 分
  • System A to System B: Navigating the Digital Transition
    2026/04/02
    System A to System B: Navigating the Digital Transition This is the first episode of The Gesamtschau, a podcast that uses computer science as a framework for understanding social change. Host Alex sets out the core premise: most of what passes for analysis in today's media is noise — short-lived, context-dependent, forgettable within days. The podcast applies a two-year relevance filter, focusing only on developments that reflect deeper structural forces. The guiding metaphor is an IT migration: society is moving from one system to another, and the transition itself — not just the destination — demands serious, methodical thinking. The episode draws on a wide range of reference points, from Wau Holland and the founding of the Chaos Computer Club to Norbert Elias on why modern sociology stopped speaking about historical development over time. Alex argues that the capacity to anticipate the future creates an ethical obligation to act on that knowledge — and that staying silent when you can see what is coming is a form of complicity. The podcast explicitly rejects moral appeals and timing predictions in favor of describing mechanics, trajectories, and the forces at work as digital systems reshape the social order. - Why the ability to anticipate the future creates responsibility, using 1914 as a historical thought experiment - Signal versus noise: the case for a two-year relevance filter in analyzing current events - The System A to System B migration metaphor: why managing the transition is harder than designing the destination - Wau Holland, the Chaos Computer Club, and the idea that computers were always a tool for cracking open society - Why Norbert Elias argued that modern sociology stopped describing historical development — and what that costs us
    続きを読む 一部表示
    33 分
まだレビューはありません