In *Easy Chair 148* (June 4, 1987), R.J. Rushdoony and Otto Scott argue that the French Revolution didn’t merely “happen” in history—it **still shapes the modern world**, and its errors keep replaying wherever elites try to seize man’s destiny. They trace the revolution’s logic back to Enlightenment assumptions (especially Locke’s belief in morally “neutral” man who can be remade by education), producing the modern self-appointed class that claims to be **the voice of reason and virtue**—and therefore entitled to rule, censor, purge, and compel. Scott emphasizes that the French Revolution became the template for later leftist revolutions: step-by-step radicalization, propaganda dressed as righteousness, selective moral outrage, the suppression of Christianity (while tolerating anti-Christian cults), public confessions and “purges,” state ownership of children, rewritten calendars and history, and the mass targeting of whole classes “for the crime of birth.” They warn that rhetoric about liberty and equality can mask “**…or death**,” and that revolutionary movements advance by isolating opponents, exploiting scandals, and keeping citizens trapped in short-term thinking. Their conclusion is urgent: because the revolutionary impulse is ultimately a war against God’s order, the only durable answer is a reawakened Christian community applying the whole Word of God to every area of life—unity, clarity, and reconstruction—before the revolution finishes what it started.

#EasyChair #Rushdoony #OttoScott #FrenchRevolution #Robespierre #RevolutionaryMyth #CulturalMemory #Propaganda #Totalitarianism #ChristianWorldview #ChristianReconstruction #ApplyGodsWord

In Easy Chair No. 147, R.J. Rushdoony and Otto Scott host Dr. Philip Wayne Powell to discuss his book The Tree of Hate, which exposes the historical myths and prejudices surrounding the Hispanic world, especially the Spanish Empire and Latin America. Powell explains how Northern European propaganda, dating from the 15th and 16th centuries, fostered widespread misconceptions about Spain’s colonization of the Americas, exaggerating violence and portraying Spaniards as barbaric. These distortions, combined with the “black legend,” have shaped modern perceptions in the United States and contributed to a general Hispanophobic bias.

The discussion also covers U.S.-Latin American relations, emphasizing the ignorance and indifference of U.S. policymakers and citizens toward the region. Powell and Scott note that Americans often rely on superficial or ideologically biased information, leading to poor foreign policy and cultural misunderstandings. They highlight examples such as misguided diplomatic appointments, misinterpretations of Latin American history, and the undervaluing of Spain’s contributions to Christianity, education, and governance.

Finally, the conversation explores broader themes, including the importance of historical accuracy, the influence of language on culture, and the value of Hispanic contributions to global history. Powell underscores the need to study Spain and Latin America carefully, noting that understanding the region is critical for current and future U.S. policy. He also stresses the role of language, particularly Castilian Spanish, in the formation and maintenance of the Spanish Empire, drawing parallels to the decline of English precision and cultural understanding today."

In Easy Chair 146 (May 14, 1987), R.J. Rushdoony argues that a culture survives only when it honors both past and future: despising the past makes a people rootless, while losing a God-given vision for the future leaves only nostalgia—relics without meaning and prosperity without purpose. He warns that this same past-orientation infects churchmen who cling to “security” instead of obeying Scripture’s mandate to advance God’s Kingdom, using history as a cautionary tale: the medieval church allied with fading rural power while the city rose, helping set the stage for an urban Reformation; later, Protestantism resisted the Industrial Revolution and lost relevance to modern city life. Rushdoony then condemns Liberation Theology as Marxism baptized—replacing conversion and discipleship with revolution—and calls for a recovered biblical outlook marked by an eschatology of victory, where faith supplies both continuity with our fathers and confidence to build a future on God’s terms. Along the way, his reviews expose the moral confusion of sentimental liberal “compassion,” the shift from responsibility to blame in modern culture, the dangers of hyper-emotional “enthusiastic religion,” and the self-defeating absurdities of subsidy politics—each example reinforcing his central point: without Scripture’s authority, societies drift into fantasy, guilt-religions, and control schemes; with it, they regain meaning, mission, and direction.

#EasyChair #Rushdoony #ChristianWorldview #HistoryAndFaith #PastAndFuture #EschatologyOfVictory #Discipleship #LiberationTheology