The Early Church Doesn't Prove Roman Catholicism | Canon Debate (Part 2)
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Send us Fan Mail
Cameron Bertuzzi argues that if Protestants accept the New Testament canon, they must also accept the authority claims of the Roman Catholic Church. In this second installment, I examine that claim by looking more closely at the historical evidence.
We discuss:
- The councils of Hippo and Carthage
- Whether Rome "gave" us the New Testament canon
- Athanasius and the Old Testament canon
- The perpetual virginity of Mary
- Confession and absolution
- Priestly celibacy
- Infant baptism
- Rome as a court of appeal
- Why historical context matters when reading the Church Fathers
My argument is simple: many of the historical facts Cameron presents are true in isolation, but they are interpreted through a Roman Catholic framework that the evidence itself does not require.
If you're interested in church history, the canon of Scripture, Protestantism, Roman Catholicism, or the Church Fathers, I hope this discussion is helpful.
If you enjoyed the episode, please like the video, subscribe, and join the discussion in the comments. I'd especially like to hear what early church evidence you believe presents the strongest challenge to Protestantism.
Listen to the full audio podcast wherever you get your podcasts.
Support the show
Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!
Click here to find us everywhere!!