『The Deadline Moved: What the EU AI Act Deferral Reveals About Boards』のカバーアート

The Deadline Moved: What the EU AI Act Deferral Reveals About Boards

The Deadline Moved: What the EU AI Act Deferral Reveals About Boards

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る
On 2 August 2026, the EU AI Act's rules for standalone high-risk systems were supposed to take effect. They will not. Six days before the deadline, the EU brought an amendment into force deferring those obligations to December 2027, because the standards and implementation machinery needed to make them workable were not ready. In this episode of The Board in the Machine, Mario Thomas, Chartered Director and Fellow of the Institute of Directors, examines what the deferral reveals about any Board whose AI governance was built around a regulatory date. A governance programme that exists because a deadline was coming is a compliance project, and when the date moved, the discipline moved with it. The instability is global: a proposed standards body in the United States covers only the frontier laboratories, the United Kingdom has asked existing regulators to govern at the point of use, and China regulates piece by piece while drafting a comprehensive law. No regime on offer covers everything a Board might deploy. Mario sets out what never moved: the directors' duties that predate the AI Act, the obligations that still apply from 2 August, and Minimum Lovable Governance as the anchor that holds under any regulatory timetable. He closes with three questions for the next Board agenda: which deployments would count as high-risk, where the organisation's ethical bar sits and who set it, and which obligations remain live regardless of the deferral. This episode is for directors, chief executives, and Boards who deploy AI systems today under law that applies today. Accountability is a condition of deployment, not a product of regulation. Read the full article at mariothomas.com
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません