The Big Book Was Built For A Spiritual Awakening Not A Social Club
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
Send us Fan Mail
AA doesn’t fail because people don’t try hard enough. It fails when we replace surrender with strategy, swap a living relationship with God for a safe set of rituals, and then act shocked when the relapse rate stays brutal.
We go straight at the uncomfortable question: why do so many people sit in Alcoholics Anonymous for years without an essential psychic change? Joel and Jen trace the AA Big Book’s original aim, enlightenment and a spiritual awakening, then compare it to what many meetings sound like today: fellowship-first sobriety, sponsor worship, “my program” thinking, and a nervousness around saying God out loud. Jen shares what she’s learning from AA history, the Oxford Group, Bill Wilson’s conversion story, and how the message was softened to be more digestible for atheists and agnostics. We also talk about what gets left out when the history is retold.
From there we get practical and personal about Step One. If you “saw the bottom and stopped in time,” do you actually know powerlessness and unmanageability the way the Big Book describes it? We connect the dots to Carl Jung and Roland Hazard, then to William James’ Varieties of Religious Experience, contrasting slow self-discipline with the sudden transformation that comes from total surrender. The goal isn’t to shame anyone. It’s to tell the truth about what kind of alcoholic you are and what kind of solution you actually need.
If this hits a nerve, listen closely, share it with someone who’s stuck, and then subscribe and leave a review so more people can find the conversation. What do you think AA loses when it avoids God?