『The Andrew Branca Show』のカバーアート

The Andrew Branca Show

The Andrew Branca Show

著者: Attorney Andrew F. Branca
無料で聴く

MISSION: political analysis that is exuberantly pro-America as envisioned by our Founders, pro-Constitutional order, pro-western civilization, pro-meritocracy, pro-family, and adamantly opposed to everyone and everything that undermines those values.

If those are your values, as well, hit that SUBSCRIBE button and join the Law of Self Defense community as we defend our great nation against the many forces that wish to tear it to rubble.

© 2026 The Andrew Branca Show
政治・政府 政治学 社会科学
エピソード
  • TN to Allow DEADLY FORCE in Defense of PROPERTY!
    2026/05/27

    All @TheBrancaShow mugs! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2k

    JOIN OUR COMMUNITY! Exclusive Members-only content & perks! Only ~17 cents/day! $5/month!
    YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/hn32rfz9
    Locals: https://tinyurl.com/yck4w9kf

    FOUNDING FATHERS SPEED DIAL: Founding Fathers SPEED DIAL: https://tinyurl.com/3f7pc8nz

    For decades there has been only one state in America that allowed for the use of deadly force in defense of mere personal property—the great state of Texas. In every other state you are limited to only non-deadly force in defense of property, period—and often not even that much.

    There’s been nothing to prevent other states from adopting as similar deadly force in defense of personal property law as Texas—it’s just that none ever has.

    Now that may be changing. The Tennessee legislature is considering a statute that would allow for the use of deadly force in defense of personal property under certain circumstances. Known as SB 1847 in the TN senate or HB 1802 in the Tennessee house, the proposed statute borrows quite a bit from the long-standing Texas law, but also differs in important respects.

    Join me LIVE at 4 PM ET as I break it all down!

    Episode #1306.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    46 分
  • More Jan. 6 Convictions on the Brink of Collapse!
    2026/05/27

    All @TheBrancaShow mugs! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2k

    JOIN OUR COMMUNITY! Exclusive Members-only content & perks! Only ~17 cents/day! $5/month!
    YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/hn32rfz9
    Locals: https://tinyurl.com/yck4w9kf

    FOUNDING FATHERS SPEED DIAL: Founding Fathers SPEED DIAL: https://tinyurl.com/3f7pc8nz

    TODAY’s MEMBERS-ONLY SHOW: “Mailbox Vandalism: Poor Choices, Poor Outcomes!”
    YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/2w6fawtx
    Locals: https://tinyurl.com/muhhns4z

    The Trump Department of Justice has moved to vacate with prejudice the convictions of various Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, including members Sachary Rehl and Roberto Minuta of each of those organizations respectively, as well as others of both groups, who were given lengthy prison sentences for purported January 6-related misconduct.

    Because the Trump DOJ is in favor of the dismissals, as obviously are the men convicted, the request to vacate is unopposed.
    This lack of opposition gives a sad face to Progressive Fascist Democrat Representative Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, who has rushed in with an estrogenically hysterical and largely fantastical amicus brief asking the D.C. Circuit to appoint adversarial counsel to fight the dismissal.

    In response, Proud Boy defendant Zachary Rehl has filed his own counter argument, pro se, and my buddy Bill Shipley has filed his own counter argument in defense of his client Oath Keeper Robert Minuta.

    Rehl’s argument comes across as personally compelling, while Shipley brings the technical legal expertise one would expect of a career DOJ prosecutor who went on to defend more than 90 January 6 defendants.

    We’ll break down both of those in today’s show!

    Join me LIVE at 11 AM ET!

    Episode #1303.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 19 分
  • CA's “No Vigilante Act” DESTROYED by 9th Circuit!
    2026/05/27

    All @TheBrancaShow mugs! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2k

    JOIN OUR COMMUNITY! Exclusive Members-only content & perks! Only ~17 cents/day! $5/month!
    YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/hn32rfz9
    Locals: https://tinyurl.com/yck4w9kf

    FOUNDING FATHERS SPEED DIAL: Founding Fathers SPEED DIAL: https://tinyurl.com/3f7pc8nz

    TODAY’s MEMBERS-ONLY SHOW: “Trump Fears SCOTUS Will NOT Close Invasion Loophole!”
    YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/7erdjy37
    Locals: https://tinyurl.com/2npwy8jy

    California thought it could seize authority over federal law enforcement — but the 9th Circuit just reminded Sacramento who actually runs the country. In a unanimous 3-0 decision in US v. California, a federal appeals court has enjoined California's "No Vigilantes Act," the state law designed to force ICE agents to wear visible identification during enforcement operations. The court didn't hedge or split hairs: when state law directly regulates the federal government's performance of its functions, the Supremacy Clause voids it — full stop.

    This is a stinging rebuke of Governor Gavin Newsom's deliberate strategy to obstruct federal immigration enforcement through legislation. The panel, authored by Trump-appointee Judge Mark Bennett, rejected California's public safety fig leaf outright, ruling that constitutional supremacy isn't subject to a balancing test. "The Supremacy Clause forbids the State from enforcing such legislation." Done.

    This is the second blow to California's anti-ICE legal campaign in two months — and another courtroom victory for the Trump administration. The Constitution is not a menu from which ambitious governors get to order selectively. Today, the 9th Circuit made sure Newsom knows it.

    Join me LIVE at 11 AM ET as I break it all down!

    Episode #1301.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    54 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません