That A Third Political Party Defies
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
That A Third Political Party Defies
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
概要
That A Third Political Party Defies
The following is quoted from a newspaper article published in the Orlando Sentinel, “545 vs. 330,000,000 People” by Charley Reese.
o Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.
o Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
o Have you ever wondered if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?
o You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The President does.
o You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
o You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.
o You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congressdoes.
o You and I don’t control monetary policy, theFederal Reserve Bank does.
o Gang of 545 = 100 senators, 435 congressmen,one President, and 9 Supreme Court justices . . . equates to 545 human beings out of 300 million who are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.” Why then would we believe that they can solve them?
I call this the business model of the Board of Directors of the Monopsony!
Monopsony Encourages Consolidation of the Producers
Vertical integration of the production companies occur as Monopsony empowers the regulators to be tougher on enforcement. Rather than horizontal integration that decentralizes delivery systems and makes enforcement less effective and reinforcement more doable and productive.
Of course, I am recommending the complete rejectionof the consolidation (pyramid) approach, where America’s nursing homes are consolidated into giant centralized conglomerates run by absentee executives who decide to cut costs and services because it is their responsibility tocomply with Obama Monopsony Care.
Not only is this approachpassé in terms of social structures and government, but it is also ironicallyself-destructive to the human element in any business. Though I am notsuggesting that we bring back the days of family-run homes, I am suggestingthat corporate takeovers for the purpose of being large enough to fend off thepower of the Monopsony Game only results in warehousing our elderly. Weexperienced this in the 1980s when managed care was the name of the game