『Texas Appellate Law Podcast』のカバーアート

Texas Appellate Law Podcast

Texas Appellate Law Podcast

著者： Todd Smith & Jody Sanders
無料で聴く

Welcome to the Texas Appellate Law Podcast—your backstage pass to the Texas and federal appellate systems. Join your hosts, Texas appellate lawyers Todd Smith and Jody Sanders, as they explore the nuances of appellate advocacy with judges, court staff, leading trial and appellate practitioners, academics, and legal innovators. Whether you're immersed in an appeal or building your trial strategy, each episode delivers practical insights to help you enhance your advocacy skills, strengthen your arguments, and stay current with evolving legal trends. Connect with us at texapplawpod.com or on LinkedIn and X (@texapplawpod). Brought to you by Texas Appellate Counsel PLLC, a solo practice dedicated to appellate advocacy, trial support, and consulting for trial lawyers. For more information visit texappcounsel.com. Sponsored by Court Surety Bond Agency and Proceed (formerly Counsel Press.) Produced and powered by LawPods, podcast marketing that converts prospects and drives revenue. The views expressed by the participants on this podcast are their own and not those of their law firms, courts, or employers. Nothing you hear on this show establishes an attorney-client relationship or is legal advice.Copyright 2026 Todd Smith & Jody Sanders マネジメント マネジメント・リーダーシップ リーダーシップ 経済学
エピソード
  • E173 | Fee Recovery, Trap Doors, and the Lodestar in the AI Age | Amy Prueger

    E173 | Fee Recovery, Trap Doors, and the Lodestar in the AI Age | Amy Prueger
    2026/08/27
    An attorney-fee award can sometimes dwarf the underlying recovery—yet, as Amy Prueger says, a party's fee request is often an afterthought. Hosts Todd Smith and Jody Sanders talk with Amy, a litigation attorney at Clark Hill PLC in Austin, about her recent paper "Taming the Fee Dragon: Attorney's Fees Recovery" and her ongoing research on the topic. Amy walks through the Texas fundamentals—the American Rule, the Rohrmoos framework, the prevailing-party requirement, the Yowell standard for appellate fees—then the trap doors that most often reverse a fee award, including segregation and invoice redactions. The conversation then moves to how the lodestar survives contact with generative AI. While Todd declares "Rohrmoos must die," Amy predicts that it "survives by not surviving." Listen in for an attorney-fee war story and one piece of advice for your next fee application.Connect and Learn More☑️ Todd Smith | LinkedIn | X☑️ Jody Sanders | LinkedIn | X☑️ Texas Appellate Law Podcast on LinkedIn | X | Instagram☑️ Texas Appellate Counsel PLLC☑️ Kelly Hart & Hallman, LLP | LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | YouTubeProduced and Powered by LawPodsSponsored by Court Surety Bond Agency and Proceed.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 10 分
  • Grants, GVRs, and Per Curiams: Checking in on the New Petition-for-Review Rules

    Grants, GVRs, and Per Curiams: Checking in on the New Petition-for-Review Rules
    2026/08/13
    In this episode, hosts Todd Smith and Jody Sanders offer a mid-year check-in on the Texas Supreme Court's new petition-for-review rules. Building on Todd's Appellate Advocate article, A New Era in Texas Supreme Court Practice, they cover what changed between the preliminary and final rules, why the new 1,000-word introduction is "the most important thousand words you're going to draft," and how record-citation and no-more-unbriefed-issues requirements are reshaping petitions. They dig into whether the new structure will produce more per curiam dispositions, unpack the Court's first GVR in Noyes v. State ex rel. Voges, and trade practice tips on the accelerated clock, dead waiver letters, and vacation notices, with a look back at their preliminary-rules breakdown in Episode 157. Tune in for why Todd is now writing petitions that ask the Court to "PC reverse," and when a GVR may be the better ask.Connect and Learn More☑️ Todd Smith | LinkedIn | X☑️ Jody Sanders | LinkedIn | X☑️ Texas Appellate Law Podcast on LinkedIn | X | Instagram☑️ Texas Appellate Counsel PLLC☑️ Kelly Hart & Hallman, LLP | LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | YouTubeProduced and Powered by LawPodsSponsored by Court Surety Bond Agency and Proceed.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    43 分
  • Suspending the Judgment: What's New in Texas Supersedeas

    Suspending the Judgment: What's New in Texas Supersedeas
    2026/07/16
    "Give yourself time, give yourself options." That refrain runs through this conversation as hosts Jody Sanders and Todd Smith break down what has changed in Texas supersedeas, the procedure for suspending a judgment during appeal. Drawing on Jody's Appellate Advocate article, "The Name's Bonds, Supersedeas Bonds," they cover the four ways to supersede a Texas judgment, how the required amount gets calculated, and the proof a debtor needs to rely on net worth or substantial economic harm. They focus on two fresh developments: the new mandatory alternative security under Rule 24.2(e), which lets some lower-net-worth debtors post non-cash assets and keep the income they produce, and the Texas Supreme Court's decision in In re Greystar Development & Construction, L.P., holding that the $25 million cap applies per debtor while leaving the joint-bond question open. They also get practical about why a net worth affidavit can stop enforcement and keep the sheriff away from your door. Listen in for a working field guide to suspending a Texas judgment.For more on supersedeas, revisit E35 with Daniel Huckabay, E123 on supersedeas and recent rule changes, and E158 with Arturo Ayala.Connect and Learn More☑️ Todd Smith | LinkedIn | X☑️ Jody Sanders | LinkedIn | X☑️ Texas Appellate Law Podcast on LinkedIn | X | Instagram☑️ Texas Appellate Counsel PLLC☑️ Kelly Hart & Hallman, LLP | LinkedIn☑️ Subscribe Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | YouTubeProduced and Powered by LawPodsSponsored by Court Surety Bond Agency and Proceed.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    47 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません