The best U.S. cash experiments still can't prove money durably improves health or child outcomes. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley spend five episodes chasing why, hearing from Ron Lynch that free cash is a chain, not a check, and from Chris Rimbal that money itself may vanish within 20 years. Dr. Conley and Dr. Rhodes weigh in last: cash helps, but isn't the answer either host hoped for. Jerremy pitches a Citizen Capital share system instead of a handout, and Dave argues the AI disruption they keep circling has already arrived.

Timestamps:

• (00:00) Five episodes, one chase – hosts hunt free money's real cost
• (05:10) The American dream's break point – traced to one decade
• (11:19) "A chain, not a check" – Ron Lynch's warning on free cash
• (18:36) Shares in America – Dave's pitch instead of handouts
• (25:20) Money itself may vanish – Chris Rimbal's 20-year prediction
• (31:42) Two PhDs weigh in – the cash data doesn't back the hype
• (36:25) The AI bomb already went off – Dave's blunt argument
• (45:00) Next three topics revealed – then dice decide the winner
• (53:39) Every fix needs more thinking – not more cash, hosts conclude

🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X

Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley close the series on the loudest disagreement yet: has the AI revolution already hit, or is it still coming? Dave says he now runs this entire podcast alone — work that used to require four or five staffers — because of AI. Jerremy pushes back, insisting today's AI still isn't truly intelligent, just a sharper search engine stitching articles together. Dave counters that the United States only ever fixes disasters after they detonate, and argues this one already has. They close on a lighter note, narrowing their next topic to housing, fentanyl, or the baby bust, then let a game of craps make the final call.

Timestamps:

• (00:00) Just a smarter search engine – Jerremy's read on today's AI
• (01:11) Dave runs the show alone – thanks entirely to AI
• (03:05) No wall in sight – every AI expert agrees it won't stop
• (09:46) Next three topics revealed – housing, fentanyl, or the baby bust
• (18:16) A game of craps decides – the next big topic

🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X

The best U.S. cash experiments still can't prove giving people money durably improves health or child outcomes. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley pick up their UBI rebrand mid-series: Dave proposes literal shares in America, dividends tied to the AI and data economy already built on public information. Jerremy renames the whole concept the Citizen Capital program, hoping shared ownership sells better than a handout ever could. Chris Rimbal predicted money itself might not exist within 20 years. Then two doctors arrive with the actual data: cash helps, but it isn't the single answer either host hoped to find.

Timestamps:

• (00:00) Shares in America, not handouts – Dave's opening pitch
• (04:12) The Citizen Capital rebrand – a new name for an old idea
• (06:56) Money itself may vanish – Chris Rimbal's 20-year prediction
• (13:19) Real data finally arrives – two PhDs weigh in on cash
• (16:16) Cash helps, but isn't the answer – the hosts' hardest admission

🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X

The US-Iran ceasefire effectively collapsed over the weekend, and crude jumped back above $74 on the news. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley walk through the tech market's gap-down open and the case for a pullback toward the 50-day moving average on the Nasdaq-100, plus why Jerremy is aggressively short SpaceX — targeting $70–100 a share against its near-$3 trillion peak valuation. They break down the real mechanism behind Fed rate policy: the federal government competing with everyday borrowers for debt buyers, which keeps rates elevated regardless of what the Fed does with its own target. Grocery prices, tariffs, and the politics of the Middle East round out the conversation, along with a preview of Tesla, Meta, and NVIDIA earnings.

Timestamps:

• (00:31) Ceasefire collapses – Iran deal unravels over the weekend, crude spikes past $74
• (00:56) Tech gap-down – Nasdaq-100 gap likely fills lower before buyers step back in
• (02:56) Short SpaceX – Jerremy targets $70–100 a share versus its near-$3T peak
• (04:57) Fed testimony collides with CPI – markets price 60–64% odds of a September move
• (07:50) Who really sets rates – government competes with everyday borrowers for debt buyers
• (09:27) Earnings season ahead – Tesla, Meta, and NVIDIA's next moves into late July

🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X

Free cash isn't a check — it's a chain, according to Ron Lynch, who argues handouts push society toward technocratic feudalism. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley open this series admitting the American dream started fracturing sometime in the 1990s, once information itself became the real currency. Lynch's claim: money given for nothing quietly erodes purpose, feeding the "trust fund baby" stigma. Dave pushes back, splitting purpose from income entirely. Jerremy admits his own family still struggles with the victim mindset Lynch describes. They close still disagreeing on one point: who actually controls the money once it's handed out.

Timestamps:

• (00:00) Five episodes, one question – hosts ask if free money actually works
• (05:10) The American dream's exact break point – pinned to one decade
• (11:19) "It's not a check, it's a chain" – Ron Lynch's core warning
• (12:30) The trust fund baby stigma – why it reveals a deeper fear
• (16:45) Who controls the money – controls the person, Lynch argues

🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X

Recipients were two percentage points less likely to work — and critics called that proof people quit when you pay them. Dr. Elizabeth Rhodes ran the longest unconditional cash study in U.S. history: 1,000 people, $1,000 a month, three years. Below the poverty line, nobody worked less. People spent the money on rent, food, and kids, but the financial boost faded to nearly nothing by year three. Rhodes says cash can't fix broken healthcare, childcare, or housing markets — and proposes a $12,000 lump sum upfront plus monthly payments. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley land on \"Social Security for all ages\" as the rebrand that might actually move the needle.

Timestamps:

• (00:00) A thousand people, a thousand dollars, three years – what actually happened
• (01:13) What a social worker catches – the gap economists walk right past
• (04:03) A blog post became a decade-long study – Sam Altman's role and limits
• (05:34) NIH, NSF, and full independence – keeping the science clean
• (10:51) 14,000 screened, 3,000 enrolled – Facebook ads, SNAP apps, random mailers
• (12:04) Two percentage points less employed – why critics grabbed the wrong headline
• (16:00) Housing, food, kids – where every dollar actually went
• (17:17) The ordinariness that matters – driving, social time, stuff around the house
• (19:07) Everyone wanted a business, nobody started one – what that really means
• (20:46) The boost that faded by year three – and why year-three worry kicked in
• (22:37) What she'd tell a senator tomorrow – the one design choice
• (31:52) Steel-manning her own study – three years and $1,000 proves nothing about national UBI
• (35:55) What if the jobs don't come back – her data gets uncomfortable
• (47:19) \"Scarcity makes people responsible\" — false – lightning round
• (50:12) Social Security for all ages – Dave and Jerremy close the knowledge gap

Connect:

• Dr. Elizabeth Rhodes – Website

{{social-links

Rhodes admits her study was never designed for a world where income decouples from labor — but it's the closest data anyone has for what's coming. People are stitching together patchworks of gig work that standard labor surveys can't even capture. Dave Conley went from \"UBI is a terrible idea\" to \"how are we not doing this\" after weeks of research. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave land on Social Security for all ages as the rebranding that might actually work — paired with a continuing-education requirement to close the knowledge gap.

Timestamps:

• (00:00) Her study wasn't built for this – but it's the best data we've got
• (00:13) What happens when jobs don't come back – her data gets uncomfortable
• (01:41) Gig patchworks surveys can't measure – the labor market nobody's tracking
• (03:06) \"Cash is not the panacea\" – three years of evidence behind that line
• (04:16) From anti-UBI to \"how aren't we doing this\" – Dave's shift in weeks
• (06:24) A $12,000 lump sum first – what monthly cash alone can't fix
• (08:13) Targeted groups over universal referendums – where testing actually works
• (11:37) \"You can't pay rent with food stamps\" – lightning round drops
• (14:32) A weekend class and community credit – Dave's unlock for entrepreneurs
• (19:23) \"Social Security for all, damn it\" – and why the branding matters

Connect:

• Dr. Elizabeth Rhodes – Website

{{social-links

People spent the money on housing, food, and their kids — every global cash study shows this, yet the stereotype persists. The financial wellbeing boost was strong in year one, weaker by year two, and nearly gone by year three. Nobody started a business, but entrepreneurial interest surged because the labor market doesn't work for people who need flexibility. Rhodes says cash hits a wall when healthcare costs $5,000 and there's no quality childcare in your ZIP code. Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley press her on what a senator should actually do with this data.

Timestamps:

• (00:00) What critics assume about free money – and what people actually bought
• (01:30) The most expensive stereotype – conditions on benefits cost taxpayers more
• (03:22) Parents skipped extra shifts – investing in their kid's confidence instead
• (06:37) Entrepreneurship interest surged – but almost nobody launched anything
• (08:23) The boost that vanished – financial wellbeing fading by year three
• (11:31) What she'd tell a senator – the one design choice that matters most
• (14:32) Cash can't climb these walls – no childcare, no insurance, no credit score
• (16:04) The Rise study – why she stopped asking \"does cash work?\"
• (18:25) Steel-manning her own study – the strongest critique she'd make herself

Connect:

• Dr. Elizabeth Rhodes – Website

{{social-links