In today's episode, we venture into the world of academic research to expose unsettling truths that are shaking the very foundations of trust. We focus on Francesca Gino, a once-celebrated Harvard professor, whose body of work has been called into question by vigilant scholars. But this isn't just the tale of one academic's downfall; it's a scathing indictment of a system that perpetuates dishonesty under the guise of scientific rigor.

Join me as I dissect three groundbreaking articles that cast a shadow not just on Gino's work, but on the state of academic research as a whole. As we navigate through manipulated data, suspiciously perfect p-values, and ethical quandaries, we uncover the vulnerabilities and incentives that might just be corrupting the ivory towers of academia.

If you've ever cited a study, marveled at an 'aha' finding, or held academia to a higher standard, this episode is a must-listen. It's not just about spotting the bad apples in the barrel; it's about asking if the barrel itself is rotten. Tune in and prepare to have your perspective irrevocably changed.

This episode explores the rapid rise of gluten-free dieting as a worldwide phenomenon and hot dietary trend. It discusses the murky science behind this trend, examining the debated theories about whether gluten or another substance called FODMAPs causes adverse reactions in people who go gluten-free. While the trend has made gluten-free products more available to those with celiac disease, it has also led some to view gluten-free as just a fad diet. I also cover the mixed impacts of this trend on celiac patients and research agendas, noting that customized medical advice is better than following extensive diet crazes. It calls for consumers to make informed choices based on facts and moderation when considering gluten-free eating.