Series 26 - The Critique: Tax Ownership of Real-Time Compliance Architecture
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
The argument that tax should own its technology architecture is not new. Tax functions have been making this case internally for years — asking for earlier involvement in ERP projects, requesting sign-off authority over configuration changes, pushing back against IT-led upgrades that break compliance workflows. What is new is the stakes. In a periodic compliance environment, the cost of the tax function not owning its architecture was measured in remediation hours at period-end: extra reconciliation work, manual corrections, amended returns. In a real-time compliance environment, the cost is measured in rejected transactions, regulatory penalties, and audit exposure that begins accumulating the moment the first non-compliant invoice is transmitted.
This episode is a critique of the governance models that most enterprises are carrying into the real-time compliance era — models built for the periodic environment that assume tax is a downstream consumer of ERP data rather than a first-principles design requirement of the ERP architecture. The critique has three dimensions. First, the change management process: most IT change governance frameworks do not include tax as a mandatory sign-off gate, which means system changes that affect tax outcomes can be approved and deployed without the tax function ever being formally notified. Second, the architecture design process: most ERP implementations and upgrades are led by IT or finance with tax involved as a late-stage configuration workstream rather than a design input, which means tax requirements are accommodated within constraints rather than driving them. Third, the vendor management process: most tax technology procurement decisions are made by IT or finance without tax having the authority to select, configure, or reject the tools that the tax function is accountable for using.
The organisations that resolve these three governance failures before their CTC mandate goes live will manage the transition. The ones that do not will manage it through compliance incidents.
Keywords: tax real-time compliance architecture, tax ownership architecture critique, tax IT governance real-time, CTC tax architecture ownership, tax function ERP governance, real-time tax IT governance, tax change management governance, tax architecture ERP design, tax vendor management governance, CTC tax IT governance, tax compliance architecture ownership, real-time tax governance critique, ERP tax architecture critique, tax IT change sign-off, tax function compliance architecture
About the Host
Rıdvan Yiğit is the Founder & CEO of RTC Suite — the world's first Autonomous Compliance and Payment Intelligence platform, built natively on SAP BTP and operating across 80+ countries.
Connect with Rıdvan:
🔗 linkedin.com/in/yigitridvan✉
ridvan.yigit@rtcsuite.com
📞 +90 545 319 93 44
Learn more about RTC Suite:
🌐 rtcsuite.com