Send us Fan Mail

If you’ve ever helped a client feel better while secretly doubting the explanation you were taught, this conversation is for you. Pain researcher Mark Johnson joins me to interrogate the quiet “hidden curriculum” in modern health care: a WEIRD, tissue-centric worldview that can be lifesaving in acute injury but can also trap both clinicians and patients when pain lingers. We talk about why the biomedical model still matters, and why it can also reach a point where it stops being the best guide for what happens next.

We get specific about how pain is shaped by more than anatomy. Mark explains how metaphors and word choice can change physiology through threat and vigilance, why militaristic “battle” language can backfire, and how labels like “chronic” may act as a nocebo by making pain feel permanent and identity-defining. We also explore prediction, priors, and “past adversity influencing now,” not as a moral failing or “maladaptation,” but as adaptive systems responding to an environment that often mismatches our biology.

To hold the complexity without drowning in the biopsychosocial checklist, Mark introduces an integral AQAL lens: inner experience, outer physiology and behavior, shared systems and environments, and shared culture and meaning. From there we move toward salutogenesis and a practical “sense of coherence” built on comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. We finish with hands-on takeaways for manual therapists: soothing touch, careful reframing, and community-based support like health coaching that helps people rebuild a workable story around their lives.

If this reframes how you talk about pain in the room, subscribe, share the episode with a colleague, and leave a review so more clinicians can find it. What word or phrase about pain are you ready to stop using?

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Manual therapy is full of confident stories: tight fascia, “alignment,” trigger points that must be released, posture that must be corrected. Then real life shows up and ruins the script. People feel better for a day, or a week, or not at all, and yet many still say massage is essential. We dig into that tension with Paul Ingram of PainScience.com, a former massage therapist known for skeptical deep dives that still leave room for nuance.

We talk about what massage therapy can reliably offer without pretending it’s a mechanical repair job. Anxiety and depression relief comes up as a standout, evidence-based benefit, and we explore why that matters for chronic pain, suffering, and threat perception. From there we wrestle with the messy data on movement and exercise therapy: sometimes helpful, often underwhelming, but still a long-term play with huge side benefits for health, function, and resilience.

The conversation turns to “therapy theater” and the ethics of the stories clinicians tell. Is it ever OK to sell posture analysis if the client loves that narrative? Where’s the line between an engaging experience and a harmful myth that creates fear, dependency, or wasted money? We also get concrete: what new grads should stop saying, what they should start doing, and why the sensory experience, warmth, consent, and personalization may be the real foundation of effective hands-on care.

If you care about pain science, chronic pain, trigger points, placebo ethics, and building a better therapeutic alliance, this one is for you. Subscribe, share it with a clinician friend, and leave a review with your answer: what belief about manual therapy did you have to unlearn?

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

What if the biggest gains in manual therapy come from changing how we dose touch, not how hard we press? That question sits at the heart of this conversation with educator and former elite high jumper Jenny Mapes, who brings a coach’s eye to sports massage and recovery. We dig into her Quadrant of Intentional Treatment—a simple, visual framework that maps care across superficial to deep and global to specific—so you can choose inputs the nervous system is ready to accept and turn short sessions into lasting change.

Together we unpack why “deep” is about more than force; it’s also about time, attention, and sensory load. Jenny explains how superficial, global inputs can downshift tone and open access, and when to pivot toward specific work without tipping a client into threat. We explore keeping clients clothed and moving on the table, coupling touch with motion, and using tools like cups and tape to amplify proprioception rather than overwhelm it. You’ll hear practical examples—from cautious anterior neck work to rib-cage breath lifts with gliding cups—that show intention beats any tool.

We also talk shop on confidence with athletes, why weekend warriors deserve the same game-day respect as pros, and how to build a network across PTs, ATs, acupuncturists, and osteos without getting stuck in turf wars. The throughline is clear: outcomes improve when touch is information, movement is integrated, and clients feel safe enough to adapt in real time. If you’re ready to move beyond scripts and treat the nervous system first, this one will sharpen your eyes and your hands.

Subscribe for more sensory-forward conversations, share this with a colleague who loves blending movement and manual therapy, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway—what quadrant will you start in next session?

Support the show