『Semi Doped』のカバーアート

Semi Doped

Semi Doped

著者: Vikram Sekar and Austin Lyons
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり

The business and technology of semiconductors. Alpha for engineers and investors alike.

© 2026 Semi Doped
エピソード
  • AI Inference Is a Data Movement Problem: Microsoft's Saurabh Dighe on Maia 300
    2026/10/15

    Microsoft's Maia 300 is a fully co-designed system, optimized to solve the memory-bound "data movement problem" of emerging agentic AI workloads.

    Saurabh Dighe, Corporate VP of Azure Hardware Systems at Microsoft, sits down with Austin to detail the architecture, from its TSMC N2P chiplet design enabling 18 TB/s of HBM4 memory bandwidth to its use of AI agents for automated kernel optimization.

    They discuss how this full-stack approach aims to maximize intelligence per watt and per dollar for Microsoft's planet-scale services.

    This episode is presented by @CrusoeAI. Crusoe's Serverless Fine-Tuning trains an open model like Llama, DeepSeek, or GLM on your own data, and you pay per million tokens, not per GPU hour. About $2 buys roughly 5M training tokens on smaller models. Get $5 in credit to start: https://semidoped.com/crusoe

    Key Takeaways:

    - Microsoft views AI inference as a data movement problem, not a compute problem. The energy cost of moving data to feed the compute engine can be two orders of magnitude higher than the compute itself.

    - The design of Maia 300 is driven by the shift from chat to agentic AI, which creates memory-bound workloads. The system delivers a 7x token throughput increase per rack over Maia 200, with a 5x increase in rack-level memory bandwidth.

    - Maia 300 uses a chiplet architecture to "extend the shoreline" of its single TSMC N2P compute die. This allows it to accommodate eight HBM4 stacks, delivering 18 TB/s of memory bandwidth.

    - Microsoft is using AI agents for "agentic kernel optimization" to automate the creation of low-level software. This strategy aims to bypass the manual optimization bottleneck and enable "Day-zero model availability" for new AI models.

    - The system is built for deployment flexibility. While servers use direct liquid cooling, a rack-level "heat exchanger unit" allows the 167 kW racks to be deployed in traditional air-cooled data centers.

    - The network is a two-tiered scale-up fabric built on standard Ethernet. Copper connects the 96 accelerators within a rack, while optics connect racks into superpods of up to 12,288 accelerators.

    Chapters:
    0:00 Intro: Saurabh Dighe
    1:39 Microsoft's Silicon Philosophy
    5:52 Workload Shift: Agentic AI
    9:32 The Data Movement Problem
    14:20 Crusoe Ad Read
    17:47 Maia 300 Specs
    24:07 Chiplets & HBM4
    29:12 Prefill/Decode Disaggregation
    30:33 Two-Tiered Network
    35:45 NPO vs. CPO
    36:46 Rack-Scale Power & Cooling
    41:35 Agentic Kernel Optimization
    49:08 What's Next: Maia 400

    Follow Chipstrat:
    Newsletter: https://www.chipstrat.com
    X: https://x.com/chipstrat

    Follow Vik:
    Newsletter: https://www.viksnewsletter.com/
    X: https://x.com/vikramskr

    Follow Semi Doped:
    Get more of Austin and Vik daily, free: https://daily.semidoped.com/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    49 分
  • Synopsys’s Amazon Deal and GPT-Synopsys: Ravi Subramanian
    2026/10/08

    The demand for workload-specific hardware is forcing a strategic shift in the semiconductor IP business. Synopsys's Ravi Subramanian joins Austin to discuss why the company is moving to a new royalty-based model for its custom "application optimized IP," starting with a billion-dollar deal with Amazon. Ravi also unpacks Synopsys's partnership with OpenAI and its vision for AI "agent engineers" that augment human designers, while explaining why physics-based simulation remains the ultimate ground truth.

    This episode is presented by Crusoe. Try Crusoe's managed inference for open models with $5 in free credits: https://semidoped.com/crusoe

    "in physics we trust is because at the end of the day, the ground truth to have the confidence, not hallucinate and be deterministic in your outcome is really what defines is a product going to be successful or not."
    — Ravi Subramanian, Synopsys

    Key Takeaways:

    - The hyperscaler IP model is shifting. Because 1-2 applications drive most revenue, companies like Amazon now demand custom “application optimized IP” instead of standards-based IP.

    - Synopsys is adopting a new business model for this custom work: a license fee, a “customization fee” to prioritize scarce engineers, and for the first time, a royalty on the final chip.

    - This new royalty model mirrors the Arm-Amazon partnership from a decade ago, aligning Synopsys with its customer’s 12-month design cycles and expanding its role to system-level bring-up.

    - Synopsys’s AI strategy isn't just tools, but a new consumption model: customers can “hire” an AI agent engineer with a specific skillset, fitting directly into existing budgets and team structures.

    - The GPT-Synopsys partnership with OpenAI is a turnkey service bundling a specialized LLM, the necessary compute, and forward-deployed engineers to solve the key adoption hurdles of model quality and compute scarcity.

    - AI is for exploration, but physics is for verification. Accurately modeling a modern CFET requires 200x more device equations than a planar FET, a complexity that demands physics-based simulators as the ground truth.

    Chapters:
    0:00 Intro: The Amazon & OpenAI Deals
    2:39 Application Optimized IP
    6:04 The New Royalty Business Model
    12:14 How Standard IP Differentiates
    18:20 The Arm-Amazon Analogy
    22:00 Synopsys's Role in Test Chips
    26:06 The Three Stages of Chip Design
    31:27 The 'Agent Engineer' AI Model
    36:20 The GPT-Synopsys Partnership
    39:27 In AI We Believe, In Physics We Trust

    Follow Chipstrat:
    Newsletter: https://www.chipstrat.com
    X: https://x.com/chipstrat

    Follow Vik:
    Newsletter: https://www.viksnewsletter.com/
    X: https://x.com/vikramskr

    Follow Semi Doped:
    Get more of Austin and Vik daily, free: https://daily.semidoped.com/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    42 分
  • Every Muse User Gets 2 CPUs and 8GB in Meta's Cloud. Your Phone Already Has That
    2026/10/01

    The push to run AI agents on edge devices will not be driven by model labs or hardware vendors, but by service providers like Meta whose ad-based business models create a powerful financial incentive to offload massive cloud compute costs onto the user's own powerful-but-idle hardware. Austin Lyons and Vik Sekar break down why the failed "AI PC" push has given way to a new, economically-driven strategy for on-device AI. They discuss how Qualcomm's acquisition of Modular provides the key software layer and why the ultimate vision is an "ecosystem of you" where the device acts as a context-aware orchestrator between local and cloud compute.

    This episode is presented by Crusoe. Try Crusoe's managed inference for open models with $5 in free credits: https://semidoped.com/crusoe

    "[Model Labs] business model is we make money when we do inference in the cloud. And yet we are saying, actually, there's a world where we would really like to just run this stuff locally... Meta's like, bro, I want to help you at the edge."
    — Austin Lyons, Chipstrat

    Key Takeaways:

    - The driver for edge AI is a business model conflict. Model labs like OpenAI sell cloud inference; service providers like Meta see it as a massive cost center for their ad-supported agents like Muse.

    - Your phone is an underutilized edge server. Its specs—like 8GB of RAM and 2 vCPUs of power—are comparable to the dedicated cloud VMs that services like Meta's Muse provision for each user.

    - The "AIPC" push failed because it was a hardware-first strategy without a use case. Today's edge AI push is a software-first strategy driven by the need to cut cloud OpEx for mass-market agents.

    - The role of the edge device is becoming a "context translation layer." It uses private data like location and biometrics to intelligently decide which AI tasks run locally versus in the cloud.

    - Qualcomm's acquisition of Modular is a key strategic move. It positions the open-source Mojo language as the "write once, run anywhere" software layer for deploying agents across diverse hardware.

    - Personal agents will lead to the "end of apps." Fixed UIs, which force a designer's paradigm on the user, will be replaced by interfaces generated on demand via natural language.

    - Google is missing its opportunity to lead in on-device AI. Despite vertical integration from TPUs to Pixel hardware and a leading ad business, it lacks the product execution of players like Meta.

    Chapters:
    0:00 Who Makes Local AI Happen?
    1:25 Making the Intro with AI
    4:43 Qualcomm's Agent Vision
    6:54 Why AIPCs Failed
    8:45 The Phone as a Portal
    13:52 Meta's Incentive for Edge AI
    24:05 The End of Apps & UIs?
    32:31 The Ideal Personal Agent
    34:25 The Edge as a Context Layer
    38:17 Qualcomm's Modular Acquisition
    43:16 The Ecosystem of You
    48:01 Google's Missed Opportunity

    Follow Chipstrat:
    Newsletter: https://www.chipstrat.com
    X: https://x.com/chipstrat

    Follow Vik:
    Newsletter: https://www.viksnewsletter.com/
    X: https://x.com/vikramskr

    Follow Semi Doped:
    Get more of Austin and Vik daily, free: https://daily.semidoped.com/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    51 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません