What happens when markets keep moving but power quietly moves to the core? We unpack state capitalism as a system that preserves the look of free enterprise while routing credit, ownership, and decision‑making through the state, creating growth that serves political ends. Drawing on Russia’s post‑Soviet renationalization, China’s “socialism with Chinese characteristics,” and Singapore’s polished model of government‑linked corporations and sovereign funds, we explore how prosperity can rise while autonomy is rationed, and why the trade so often begins in crisis.

We examine the mechanics: state‑controlled banking that guides investment, managed competition that selects winners, and messaging that frames control as stability or fairness. In Russia, energy profits fund power and war; in China, rapid expansion rides alongside surveillance and campaigns that tether profit to party priorities; in Singapore, disciplined planning delivers enviable outcomes while permission sets the boundaries of civic life. Across these cases, the form of capitalism remains, but the heartbeat belongs to the center. Profits exist, but they are political. Freedom exists, but it is conditional.

Our take is straightforward: a flourishing market needs more than efficiency; it needs dispersed power, transparent rules, and citizens capable of self‑government. State capitalism assumes citizens can’t be trusted to govern themselves and replaces moral agency with management. We argue for a mixed market that limits central gatekeeping, protects independent courts, opens credit, and keeps ownership broad enough to prevent capture. If you care about both prosperity and dignity, this conversation will help you spot the difference between authentic enterprise and its state‑managed echo.

If this resonates, follow the show, share it with a friend, and leave a quick review to help more curious listeners find The Equalizer.

X: @TheEQualEyezer