This episode serves as the foundational primer for Signals Over Noise.

Rather than focusing on a single conflict, this episode introduces a framework for understanding how escalation actually works—across war, domestic politics, institutions, and social breakdown.

We examine why escalation so often feels sudden, why warning signs are missed, and why the human cost of conflict is usually locked in long before violence becomes visible.

At the center of this episode is a model of escalation built around alignment: between action, meaning, interpretation, and outcomes. The goal is not prediction for its own sake, but early recognition—identifying when better outcomes are quietly disappearing.

This episode is designed to be watched once and reused mentally across every episode that follows.

What This Episode Covers

• Why escalation is not primarily a violence problem

• How kinetics (actions) change systems and close options

• Message coherence through saying, showing, and silence (in the Wittgensteinian sense)

• Why non-propositional language (ethics, morality, religion, destiny) makes conflicts g

• How language games shape interpretation and misinterpretation

• The difference between positive-sum, zero-sum, and negative-sum outcome spaces

• Why escalation becomes predictable once alignment collapses

• How this framework applies to foreign policy, domestic politics, and institutional trust

Why This Episode Matters

Most analysis starts too late—after violence, polarization, or institutional failure is already rent

This primer is about seeing escalation earlier, when:

• communication can still correct misunderstanding

• s

• and human costs are not yet unavoidable

If you understand the framework introduced here, future episodes won’t feel like isolated events—they’ll feel like case studies of the same underlying process.

Background

The framework introduced in this episode draws on:

• Practical experience in military and political operations

• Formal research and publication through Small Wars Journal

• Philosophical foundations in language, meaning, and game theory

It is not a theory of war alone, but a general model of escalation in human systems.

How to Use This Episode

• New listeners: start here

• Returning listeners: use this as a reference lens.

• Analysts, students, and practitioners: apply the framework to current events and past cases

Future episodes will explicitly build on this primer.