A comprehensive overview of the rights of suspects under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and its Codes of Practice, focusing heavily on procedural safeguards during detention and investigation. These safeguards include the right to free legal advice and the right to have someone informed of the detention, both of which can be delayed only under stringent conditions and for a maximum of 36 hours. The texts also detail strict detention time limits and mandatory periodic reviews to prevent arbitrary detention. Furthermore, the sources meticulously outline various identification procedures—such as video identification and parades—which must adhere to fairness standards to minimize the risk of mistaken identification. Finally, the sources explain the suspect's right to silence, detailing the caution police must give and explaining the risk of adverse inferences if a fact is not mentioned when questioned but is later relied upon in court, while also emphasizing the crucial role of the solicitor in advising clients, particularly those considered vulnerable.

An extensive overview of several major categories of English criminal law, outlining the actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind) required for various offenses. They detail crimes against the person, such as murder, voluntary manslaughter, and common assault, clarifying the roles of partial defenses like loss of control and diminished responsibility. Furthermore, the documents examine serious property offenses, defining theft, robbery, and burglary under the Theft Act 1968, and thoroughly explaining the elements of criminal damage and arson. Finally, the sources explore the modern framework of fraud under the Fraud Act 2006, distinguishing between fraud committed by false representation, failure to disclose, and abuse of position.

Fundamental principles of criminal liability in England and Wales, focusing on both parties to a crime and inchoate offenses like attempt. The first source details the roles of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the defendant, and the victim, distinguishing between a principal offender (who commits the actus reus and possesses the mens rea) and accomplices or secondary parties who aid, abet, counsel, or procure a crime. It further explains concepts like joint enterprise and the requirements for effective withdrawal from an offense. The second source establishes the legal framework for attempt to commit an offence, requiring an act that is more than merely preparatory to the full crime, as defined by case law like R v Gullefer and R v Jones. Crucially, conviction for attempt demands a high threshold of mens rea, specifically the intention to commit the full offense, and liability can still apply even when the crime is factually impossible, as confirmed in R v Shivpuri.