In this episode of ReformCast, Rob Anderson examines proposed changes to Clark County Council’s rules and procedures that raise serious questions about transparency, power, and political retaliation.

Rob breaks down why the council suddenly wants to formalize “removal powers” that would allow councilors to be stripped of committee assignments—coming on the heels of last year’s controversial removal of Councilor Belkot over the light rail vote and ongoing litigation tied to that decision. He questions why, if the county claims its actions were already legal, these powers are now being written into the rules.

The episode also revisits last year’s fight over invocation, prayer, and the Pledge of Allegiance, as councilors quietly propose moving them outside the formal meeting—an incremental shift that could signal future removal altogether.

During public comment, Rob urges the council to adopt a rule requiring cooperation with law enforcement investigations related to county business. Councilor Sue Marshall responds defensively, claiming no one refused to cooperate—prompting Rob to walk listeners through the documented timeline of delays and non-responses detailed in the Skamania County investigation.

Finally, Rob highlights growing anti-ICE sentiment in Clark County, including an upcoming resolution scheduled for discussion, following similar moves by the City of Vancouver and state officials.

As always, ReformCast keeps a close watch on county government actions that impact accountability, public trust, and the rule of law.