Rockefeller Habits vs Theory of Constraints: Neuroscience Picks a Winner
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Most strategic planning frameworks sound smart. Very few actually work with how the human brain is wired.
In this episode, we break down two of the most widely used business frameworks — Rockefeller Habits (Scaling Up) and Theory of Constraints — and evaluate them through a neuroscience lens to answer one simple question:
👉 Which one actually helps business owners execute, focus, and scale faster?
Drawing from real-world experience scaling $30M+ businesses, we unpack why multi-priority planning systems often create cognitive overload, diluted focus, and decision fatigue — even when they’re “best practice.”
You’ll hear:
- Why dividing attention across 3–5 priorities violates how focus and flow actually work
- How Theory of Constraints aligns with neuroscience by forcing singular focus
- Why most “strategic plans” create motion, not momentum
- The difference between clarity that feels good and clarity that produces results
- When Rockefeller Habits can help — and when it quietly slows you down
📌 Key insight: Strategic planning is just resource allocation. Neuroscience is clear: allocating resources to one constraint beats spreading them across many “important” goals.
If you’ve ever felt busy, organized, and still stuck — this episode explains exactly why, and what to do instead 084 Rockefeller Habits vs Theor….
⚡ Biz Meds Podcast | Neuroscience Business Coaching
Free Masterclass: https://www.myvelocitybusinesscoach.com/breakthrough
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/iamdarrisperzan
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/velocitybusinesscoaching