Reviews Measure Performance — Why the Annual Review Measures the Wrong Thing | Lies of HR #9
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Reviews Measure Performance — Why the Annual Review Measures the Wrong Thing | Lies of HR #9
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
"The annual performance review objectively measures who performed and who didn't." Except the score often says more about the manager who gave it than the person who earned it.
In Lie No. 9 of Lies of HR, we take it apart: how recency, availability and affinity bias quietly distort every rating, why forced ranking and the bell curve are statistically invalid (real performance follows a power law, not a normal distribution), how Goodhart's law turns any review score into a target people game rather than a measure that works, and why automating the whole flawed process with AI just makes biased judgement faster and harder to challenge. Then the reframe: separate evaluation from development, make feedback continuous, and keep a human accountable for every call.
The voices are AI; the arguments come from Martin Spiteri Schillig's sixteen years in HR.
Full written breakdown, sources, and the mailing list: https://liesofhr.com/lies/we-measure-performance
—
This is the ninth lie in the series. New episodes regularly. Also on Spotify, Apple Podcasts and Amazon Music.