エピソード

  • Not My God, Not My War: The Marcionite Challenge to the Pentagon and Yahweh

    Not My God, Not My War: The Marcionite Challenge to the Pentagon and Yahweh
    2026/04/20
    In a historic first, a Christian church has filed an intent to sue the Secretary of War, not based on pacifism, but on the grounds of "compelled idolatry." This episode breaks down the Marcionite Christian Church’s unprecedented legal guidance: if the state consecrates a war to Yahweh using Torah scriptures, a follower of God Our Father cannot participate.We examine:The "Pentagon Protocol": How the March 2026 worship service turned a military deployment into a religious burden.The RFRA Strategy: Why "Not My God, Not My War" is a more powerful legal argument than traditional conscientious objection.The Historic Precedent: For the first time in the modern era, a church is auditing the government's theology in federal court.⁠Academic paper⁠: Religious Accommodation for Marcionite Christians in the 2026 Iran War: Theology, Law, and the Rejection of Yahweh‑Blessed Conflicthttps://journal.pre-nicene.org/april/Pete Hegseth’s holy war: the militant Christian theology animating the US attack on Iranhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/n...⁠Official Statement⁠: Marcionite Churchhttps://www.marcionitechurch.org/Mili...⁠Press Release⁠:https://www.mymalonetelegram.com/onli...⁠The Very First Bible⁠ (Evangelion):https://theveryfirstbible.orgFree RFRA Exemption Template (⁠direct link⁠):https://payhip.com/b/uVIhPH.R.1308 - Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-c...Chapter listUnprecedented Lawsuit: Marcionite Church Challenges Pentagon Prayer00:00:00A church challenges military prayerUnderstanding Marcionite Theology: God Our Father vs. Yahweh00:03:06Two gods, two pathsComparing Torah's War God to Evangelion's Loving Father00:05:16War god vs. loving GodWhy Marcionites Use RFRA, Not Conscientious Objection00:08:30Religious freedom vs. military dutyGuidance for Marcionites: Legal Steps and Global Implications00:10:46Navigating military religious claimsThe Core Argument: This War is Compelled Idolatry, Not Pacifism00:13:37War as compelled idolatryVisit the free library and learn more.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • Not My God, Not My War: The Marcionite Challenge to the Pentagon

    Not My God, Not My War: The Marcionite Challenge to the Pentagon
    2026/04/16
    In a historic first, a Christian church has filed an intent to sue the Secretary of War, not based on pacifism, but on the grounds of "compelled idolatry." This episode breaks down the Marcionite Christian Church’s unprecedented legal guidance: if the state consecrates a war to Yahweh using Torah scriptures, a follower of God Our Father cannot participate.
    We examine:The "Pentagon Protocol": How the March 2026 worship service turned a military deployment into a religious burden.The RFRA Strategy: Why "Not My God, Not My War" is a more powerful legal argument than traditional conscientious objection.The Historic Precedent: For the first time in the modern era, a church is auditing the government's theology in federal court.
    Academic paper: Religious Accommodation for Marcionite Christians in the 2026 Iran War: Theology, Law, and the Rejection of Yahweh‑Blessed Conflicthttps://journal.pre-nicene.org/april/Pete Hegseth’s holy war: the militant Christian theology animating the US attack on Iranhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/apr/10/pete-hegseth-christianity-iran-war-crusade
    Official Statement: Marcionite Churchhttps://www.marcionitechurch.org/Military-ExemptionPress Release:https://www.mymalonetelegram.com/online_features/press_releases/marcionite-church-announces-religious-accommodation-program-following-pentagon-s-consecrated-warfare-declaration/article_cea15a7b-6f4f-5579-b07a-4d17daba3e3d.html
    The Very First Bible (Evangelion):https://theveryfirstbible.org
    Free RFRA Exemption Template (direct link):https://payhip.com/b/uVIhPH.R.1308 - Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-bill/1308




    Visit the free library and learn more.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • One Eclipse, Two Earthquakes: Jesus Arrives

    One Eclipse, Two Earthquakes: Jesus Arrives
    2026/03/15
    You’ve likely seen the headlines recently - a story centering around an academic paper studying a massive earthquake that struck the Dead Sea sometime between 26 and 36 AD. The headlines were typical clickbait, claiming "scientific proof" of the crucifixion. It turns out that earthquake was part of a much larger seismic event coupled with a total solar eclipse - and it wasn't marking a death - it marked an ARRIVAL.Journal of Pre-Nicene Christian Studies:https://journal.pre-nicene.org/One-Eclipse-Two-Earthquakes.htmlNASA:https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEsearch/SEsearchmap.php?Ecl=00291124The first Christian bible 144 ADhttps://theveryfirstbible.orgRaw academic paper (A.W. Mitchell):https://zenodo.org/records/18805868Evangelion overview:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-AKnEbLD5wTheophanic Replacement Protocol (TRP):https://journal.pre-nicene.org/TheophanicReplacementProtocol.html

    Visit the free library and learn more.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • Theophanic Replacement Protocol: How Christianity Was Hijacked And Its God Replaced With Yahweh

    Theophanic Replacement Protocol: How Christianity Was Hijacked And Its God Replaced With Yahweh
    2026/01/21
    In this episode we explore The Theophanic Replacement Protocol, a forensic model explaining the formation of normative Christian orthodoxy through a coordinated, multi-phase program of theological, literary, and physical overwriting. Central to this model is the spiritual identity theft of God Our Father. The persona of “Yahweh” - characterized by violence, tribalism, and conditional law - was systematically grafted onto the biography of the true God of grace revealed by Jesus. Our roundtable discusses five evidentiary strata: 1) The traditio-historical datum of the 29 AD Eclipse-Seismic Theophany; 2) The textual witness of the primitive Evangelion and Apostolikon; 3) A characterological antithesis proving Yahweh’s incompatibility with the Father; 4) The material evidence of the Diocletian Persecution’s targeted destruction; and 5) The archival dependency of later orthodoxy on Marcionite sources. We also discuss how the Protocol culminated in a Damnatio Memoriae against the primary stratum, erasing its physical texts and memory, allowing a synthetic, Yahwistic Christianity to emerge as the sole historical narrative.Notes:Journal of Pre-Nicene Christian Studieshttps://journal.pre-nicene.org/TheophanicReplacementProtocol.htmlISSN: 3068-8469 December, 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17964659ReferencesBarnes, T. D. (1981). Constantine and Eusebius. Harvard University Press.BeDuhn, J. D. (2013). The First New Testament: Marcion’s Scriptural Canon. PolebridgePress.Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana. (12th cent.). Codex Vaticanus Arch. B. S. Pietro A 3 (Vat.lat. 214664). Digital Vatican Library. https://digi.vatlib.it/mss/detail/214664The Canons of the Council of Nicaea (325 CE). In Schaff, P., & Wace, H. (Eds.), *Nicene andPost-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 14.*Lactantius. (c. 313-315 CE). On the Deaths of the Persecutors (De MortibusPersecutorum).The Very First Bible. https://theveryfirstbible.orgLe Bas, P., & Waddington, W. H. (1870). Inscriptions grecques et latines recueillies enGrèce et en Asie Mineure (Vol. 3, Inscription 2558).Roth, D. T. (2015). The Text of Marcion’s Gospel. Brill.Tertullian. (c. 207-212 CE). Against Marcion (Adversus Marcionem).Marcionite Church. https://marcionitechurch.orgPrimary Source Tradition:Marcionite Church (2020). The Very First Bible: The Evangelion and Apostolikon (ISBN 978-0578641591).

    Visit the free library and learn more.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    20 分