エピソード

  • You Need AI Sysadmins Can Trust, With Cribl's Nikhil Mungel
    2026/05/13

    What happens when a non-deterministic AI system is asked to touch production telemetry or generate changes for an SRE pipeline? The cost of being “close enough” can be lost data, downtime, or a security incident.

    Cribl’s Nikhil Mungel joins Cory to break down what it takes to build AI that sysadmins can actually trust. The conversation digs into harness engineering and the practical guardrails that turn probabilistic models into repeatable, verifiable outcomes. They cover why breaking work into small chunks matters, how validation and testing become the real leverage point for AI-native development, and what “code factories” mean for review, CI, and platform reliability when teams can generate a thousand PRs an hour.

    Platform engineers will also hear a pragmatic take on the future of the job. The focus shifts away from typing code and toward building systems for verification, simulation, and safe deployment at scale, plus clearer ways to decide what needs human scrutiny and what can ship automatically.

    Guest: Nikhil Mungel, Head of AI R&D at Cribl

    Nikhil Mungel is the Head of AI R&D at Cribl, where he's building LLM-powered systems for IT and Security data transformation and analysis. Before Cribl, he spent over a decade developing distributed systems across the observability and consumer social tech landscape. He lives in San Francisco with his wife and two kids. His current focus is applying AI to make complex infrastructure more intuitive and explainable.

    Nikhil Mungel, Website

    Nikhil Mungel, X

    Cribl, Website

    Cribl, LinkedIn

    Links to interesting things from this episode:

    • Cribl Guard
    • “Open source died in March. It just doesn't know it yet.” by Dan Lorenc, CEO of Chainguard

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • Green CI and Merge Queue Mastery with Trunk’s Eli Schleifer
    2026/04/15

    When a flaky test can stall a merge queue, “just rerun CI” stops scaling fast.

    Cory talks with Trunk co-founder and CEO Eli Schleifer about the outer loop problems that show up as teams ship more code - especially with AI-assisted development increasing PR volume. They break down what a merge queue is, why logical merge conflicts happen even when individual PRs are green, and how predictive testing helps protect main without forcing constant retesting.

    Eli also explains how Trunk approaches flaky tests: collecting JUnit results, using quarantines so known flakes don’t block delivery, and fingerprinting failures to tell the difference between “this always times out” and “this was just broken by a recent change.” The conversation closes on how review and quality practices may shift as code generation accelerates - and what still needs strong guardrails like tests, security checks, and reliable CI signals.

    Guest: Eli Schleifer, co-founder and CEO of Trunk

    Eli Schleifer leads Trunk’s technical vision and product strategy, focused on closing the gap between AI-speed code generation and human-speed delivery by removing the bottlenecks that slow modern engineering teams. Trunk’s platform eliminates flaky tests, resolves merge queue constraints, and redesigns CI systems to enable high-throughput, continuous delivery.

    Prior to founding Trunk, Eli was CTO at Directr, which was acquired by Google, and has served in engineering leadership roles at YouTube, Uber, and Microsoft.

    Eli Schleifer, X

    Trunk, website

    Trunk, Slack

    Trunk, Github

    Trunk, X

    Links to interesting things from this episode:

    • Balsamiq
    • “Code First Engineering” by Eli Schleifer

    続きを読む 一部表示
    50 分
  • AI-Native Ops: Making AI Safe for Production with William Collins
    2026/04/01
    What happens when your “coworker” can generate code and changes faster than your team can review them, and production still has to stay up?William Collins breaks down what AI-Native Ops looks like when you take reliability seriously: where reasoning should stop, where deterministic automation should begin, and how guardrails like compliance checks, version pinning, and controlled workflows keep AI from turning into outage fuel. Cory and William also dig into why context windows and tool sprawl matter in real systems, how protocols like MCP and agent-to-agent communication are shaping day-to-day automation, and why regulated environments can’t adopt new tech with hype-driven shortcuts.If you’re a platform engineer trying to balance speed with safety, this conversation offers a practical way to use AI for the work that drags teams down, without giving up operational discipline.Guest: William Collins, Director of Technical Evangelism at Itential, AWS community builder, and the co-host of the Cloud Gambit podcastWilliam Collins is a strategic thinker and catalyst for innovation. Over his career, he has helped enterprises build large-scale networks, driven modernization through cloud adoption, and excels at optimizing complex environments through good design practices and automation. Today, William works as Director of Technical Evangelism for Itential, where he focuses on evangelizing the Itential Platform, fostering strong relationships with customers to fully realize their goals, engaging with community, and advocating for the successful future of network, security, and automation infrastructure.As a content creator, William hosts The Cloud Gambit Podcast with Eyvonne Sharp, a show that unravels the state of cloud computing, markets, strategy, and emerging trends with industry experts. He is also a LinkedIn Learning Instructor (Automation, Cloud, and Network Engineering Content), AWS Community Builder (Network & Content Delivery), and is a group organizer for the USNUA - Kentucky User Group (KYNUG).Prior to Itential, William worked as a Principal Cloud Architect and Director of Technical Evangelism for Alkira where he helped grow the company from lean beginnings to being ranked 25th Fastest-Growing Company in North America and 6th in the Bay Area on the 2024 Deloitte Technology Fast 500. He also held various senior technical roles across the enterprise space in Financial Services and Healthcare, most recently at Humana as Director of Cloud Architecture. Outside of tech, his time is spent with family, woodworking, ice hockey, and guitar.Opinions expressed are solely his own and do not express the views or opinions of his employer.William Collins, BlogWilliam Collins, YouTubeWilliam Collins, X William Collins, Instagram William Collins, TikTokWilliam Collins, GitHubItential“The Cloud Gambit” podcastLinks to interesting things from this episode:Ghostty“Harness design for long-running application development” by Anthropic
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 3 分
  • Infrastructure as Code's Hidden Problem with Pavlo Baron
    2026/03/18
    Terraform drift, state wrangling, and a growing “tools for tools” stack are still daily work for many platform teams - despite a decade of DevOps talk and cloud maturity. Why does ops automation so often feel like it needs babysitting?Pavlo Baron breaks down where Infrastructure as Code tends to break down in real organizations: manual drift management, low-level state complexity, and a lack of practical abstractions that let developers self-serve without inheriting the entire ops burden.The conversation digs into what a more use-case-driven approach could look like - where teams can choose when to enforce desired state, when to accept emergency changes, and how to build “guardrails” that reduce mistakes without slowing delivery.Pavlo also explains why type safety and constrained interfaces matter (especially as AI starts generating more code and infrastructure changes), and why the future of platform engineering depends less on slogans and more on systems that reduce toil.Guest: Pavlo Baron, Co-Founder and CEO of Platform Engineering LabsPavlo Baron is Co-Founder and CEO of Platform Engineering Labs, who are crafting tools to remove the toil from the operations work, with a current focus on infrastructure. He is a veteran in the space, having served in all kinds of roles throughout his career that spans more than 35 years. Previously, he was co-founder, CTO, and major inventor at an observability startup, Instana, that was acquired by IBM in 2020. Pavlo is a frequent conference speaker and author of several books.Pavlo Baron, Xhttps://pavlobaron.medium.com/https://github.com/platform-engineering-labshttps://www.linkedin.com/company/platform-engineering-labshttps://x.com/plateng_labshttps://bsky.app/profile/platform.engineeringhttps://mastodon.social/@plateng_labshttps://www.youtube.com/@plateng-labsLinks to interesting things from this episode:The Pkl Primerformaeformae quick start"10+ Deploys Per Day: Dev and Ops Cooperation at Flickr"“Where everyone is responsible, no one is really responsible.” Albert BanduraJPL “Visions of the Future”“Fallout: New Vegas”
    続きを読む 一部表示
    58 分
  • Why Extend Went All-In on Serverless Platform Engineering
    2026/03/04

    Billions of requests a month on AWS Lambda can cost less than a single engineer’s laptop budget, but only if the architecture and developer workflow are designed for it.

    Justin Masse, Senior Platform DevOps Engineer at Extend, shares how Extend committed early to a serverless-first approach and built a platform that prioritizes developer speed and low operational toil. The conversation breaks down what it takes to run active-active, multi-region systems in a serverless world, how the team keeps services small and fast, and why asynchronous, event-driven design changes both reliability and cost.

    You’ll also hear how Extend treats developer experience as a core platform responsibility: templated microservices, fast deployment pipelines, ephemeral environments for pull requests, and infrastructure that developers can own without becoming cloud specialists. A big theme is using AWS CDK and internal abstractions to keep infrastructure close to the application code, so teams can move quickly while keeping platform standards consistent.

    Finally, the discussion gets practical about tradeoffs that show up after the “serverless is easy” pitch: local development challenges, the real cost center (observability), and where AI is helping today, including an internal agent that diagnoses failed deployments and suggests fixes.

    What you’ll learn

    1. Why Extend avoids servers and VPC complexity, and what they use instead
    2. Patterns for active-active, multi-region thinking in a serverless architecture
    3. How DevEx practices like templates and ephemeral environments reduce friction
    4. A pragmatic approach to IaC with CDK and reusable internal constructs
    5. Where serverless costs stay low, and why observability often dominates the bill
    6. How AI is being applied to platform workflows without skipping engineering judgment

    Guest: Jusin Masse, Senior Platform DevOps Engineer at Extend

    Justin Masse is a self-proclaimed lead chaos engineer, recognized within niche engineering communities for his expertise Chaos Engineering and Infrastructure & DevOps.

    The father of three young kids, a husband, a recent MBA graduate, recent cancer survivor, and competitive powerlifter, he still finds time to actively contribute to the platform engineering community.

    Justin Masse, website

    Justin Masse, GitHub

    Extend, website

    Links to interesting things from this episode:

    1. Episode with Adrian Cockroft
    2. “From $erverless to Elixir” by Cory O’Daniel

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 2 分
  • Observability in the AI Era with New Relic's Nic Benders
    2026/02/18

    What happens when nobody wrote the code running in your production environment? As AI-generated software becomes standard practice, platform engineers face a new challenge: operating systems without experts to consult.

    Nic Benders, Chief Technical Strategist at New Relic, has spent 15 years watching observability evolve from basic server monitoring to understanding complex distributed systems. Now he's tackling the next frontier: how to maintain and operate software when there's no human author to ask why something was built a certain way.

    The conversation covers the shift from instrumentation being the hard problem to understanding being the bottleneck. Nic explains why inventory matters more than you think, how to approach AI-generated code as a black box that needs testing and telemetry, and why "garbage in, safety out" should be your new mantra.

    You'll learn practical strategies for instrumenting modern systems with OpenTelemetry, why your observability hierarchy needs to start with knowing what's actually running, and how to build platforms that make safe deployment easier than risky shortcuts. Nic also shares his perspective on technical drift versus technical debt and what changes when your best troubleshooting tool - institutional knowledge - no longer exists.

    Whether you're drowning in observability data or just starting to instrument your systems, this conversation offers concrete approaches for building understanding into your platform engineering practice.

    Guest: Nic Benders, Chief Technical Strategist at New Relic

    Nic Benders is New Relic's Chief Technical Strategist. Part of the Engineering team since the early days of the company, Nic has been involved with everything from Agents to ZooKeeper and all the pieces and products in between. As New Relic's Chief Technical Strategist, he now looks after the long-term technical strategy behind the product and the experience of all the engineering teams who build it. Before New Relic, he worked in the mobile space, managing back-end messaging and commerce systems powering some of the largest carriers in the world.

    New Relic, website

    New Relic, Blog

    Links to interesting things from this episode:

    1. OpenClaw (aka Moltbot, aka Clawdbot)
    2. Moltbook

    続きを読む 一部表示
    51 分
  • Simplicity at Scale: Cleaning House for Platform Teams with Brian Childress
    2025/12/17

    Why do so many “modern” platforms feel slow, fragile, and painful to work on?

    Platform engineer and fractional CTO Brian Childress joins Cory to discuss how over-engineering, resume‑driven development, and scattered tooling quietly block teams from shipping value. They explore why simplicity is a competitive advantage for platform teams, especially as AI becomes part of everyday development.

    You’ll learn:

    • How to design a simple platform MVP that developers actually like using
    • What a good local‑to‑prod story looks like (and why it’s the real scaling superpower)
    • Practical ways to onboard humans and AI tools so both can contribute faster
    • Where teams introduce unnecessary complexity with Kubernetes, microservices, and NoSQL
    • How to think about scaling in three dimensions: users, developers, and features
    • Why good architecture, docs, and decision records make AI more useful, not less
    • How to spot and avoid resume‑driven development before it explodes your platform

    Whether you’re cleaning up a messy stack or trying to keep a young platform from drifting into chaos, this conversation gives you concrete patterns for keeping things simple while still scaling teams, systems, and features.

    Guest: Brian Childress, Platform engineer and fractional CTO

    Brian Childress is an accomplished Software Engineer, Architect and Fractional CTO. For over a decade Brian has developed applications in healthcare, finance, and consumer products. Brian has spoken internationally on topics such as application security and developer tooling. Brian spends his free time researching and teaching the latest in application and API security design and best practices.

    Brian Childress, website

    Brian Childress, X

    Links to interesting things from this episode:

    • Replit
    • Lovable

    続きを読む 一部表示
    41 分
  • Using Feature Flags to Tame Complexity with Mike Zorn
    2025/12/03

    What if changing a single flag could save you from a failed migration, a broken API, or a late-night rollback?

    Join us as we dive into how feature flags become a practical tool for changing application behavior at runtime, not just toggling UI elements. Cory talks Mike Zorn about real stories from LaunchDarkly and Rippling, covering how teams use flags to ship safely, debug faster, and simplify complex systems.

    You’ll hear about:

    • Using feature flags to avoid staging overload and ship directly to production
    • Migrating critical systems and databases with minimal downtime and risk
    • Controlling log levels and rate limits for specific customers on the fly
    • Managing flag sprawl so teams do not drown in half-rolled-out features
    • Experimenting with AI features, prompts, and models without fully committing

    If you’re working on a platform, running critical infrastructure, or just trying to ship faster without breaking everything, this conversation offers concrete patterns you can start using right away.

    Guest: Mike Zorn, Senior Software Engineer at Rippling

    Mike’s software engineering journey began with an early interest in problem-solving and programming, starting with creating programs on a TI-83 calculator in middle school. After studying mathematics in college, he transitioned into software through an applied math project that required coding, which sparked his interest in engineering as a career.

    Professionally, he has worked at several product and SaaS companies, including one that was an early LaunchDarkly customer, where they experienced firsthand the challenges of managing feature flags internally. That experience led him to appreciate the value of tools like LaunchDarkly, eventually joining the company himself. Since then, he has contributed across various areas, including focusing on how LaunchDarkly can best adopt its own platform internally to streamline releases and help engineers work more efficiently. His latest adventure has been joining Rippling as a Senior Staff Software Engineer.

    Mike Zorn, GitHub

    Mike Zorn, Email

    Rippling

    LaunchDarkly

    Links to interesting things from this episode:

    • SigNoz
    • Signadot
    • Open Container Initiative
    • “Using Feature Flags to Avoid Downtime During Migrations”
    • Apache Iceberg

    続きを読む 一部表示
    43 分