Send us Fan Mail

Your client keeps bouncing between “fine” and full-blown crisis, and you’re doing solid therapy work, so why isn’t it sticking? We zoom out to the missing piece many clinicians overlook: level of care. When the setting doesn’t match the clinical need, progress can stall, clients can disengage, and everyone ends up frustrated. We walk through the continuum of care as a ladder, from inpatient and intensive services down to outpatient therapy and peer support, with the key idea that movement is flexible and responsive, not one-way.

We also get concrete about what misplacement looks like in real life. If a client is consistently overwhelmed, unsafe, or destabilizing between sessions, outpatient may not be enough support. If someone lands in a highly structured program after a brief spike and then checks out, “resistance” might actually be poor fit. We talk through diagnoses that often trigger placement questions, including severe bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and substance use disorders, while emphasizing why diagnosis alone is never the full answer. Functioning, recovery environment, supports, and risk factors matter just as much, especially with co-occurring disorders and dual diagnosis.

To make these decisions clearer and easier to justify, we break down the ASAM criteria for substance use and LOCUS for mental health, plus how strong documentation and the language of medical necessity show up in managed care. We also share practical, therapist-friendly strategies you can use immediately: thorough biopsychosocial assessment at intake, regular updates over time, collaborative decision making, warm handoffs between providers, and simple psychoeducation so clients understand why a level change might help.

If this helps you think differently about placement and the continuum of care, subscribe, share the episode with a colleague, and leave a review so more therapists can find it. What’s the clearest “wrong level of care” sign you’ve seen in your work?

If you need to study for your national licensing exam, try the free samplers at: LicensureExams


This podcast is not associated with the NBCC, AMFTRB, ASW, ANCC, NASP, NAADAC, CCMC, NCPG, CRCC, or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.

Send us Fan Mail

AI is about to walk into your therapy room wearing a lab coat and a confident tone, and the licensing exam is going to ask whether you’ll believe it. I’m Eric Twaktman, and I’m laying out the real skill behind every AI ethics question: holding on to clinical judgment when an algorithm hands you a neat, orderly recommendation that looks “better” than your own work.

We get clear on what counts as AI in counseling, from progress-note drafting and session summaries to chatbots and automated risk assessments. Then we slow down on the most important concept: AI produces plausible output based on patterns, not understanding of your client’s context. That single idea explains why the NBCC draws a hard line against AI replacing professional judgment or the therapist-client relationship, and why “the software said so” is never a safe defense when client welfare is on the line.

From there, we walk through the NBCC-aligned principles that let you reason through almost any scenario: accountability, client welfare, AI competence, clinical competence, and confidentiality. We also tackle the tripwires that create real-world complaints and exam wrong answers fast: AI-specific informed consent that is separate and refusable, true de-identification (not just removing names), HIPAA-grade security, secure deletion policies, and algorithmic bias that can distort care across language and culture. A case study of a stressed practicum student shows how fatigue and deference can snowball into multiple ethics violations without anyone intending harm.

If you’re studying for the exam or building an AI policy for your practice, this gives you a simple filter: AI recommends, we decide, and we stay fully accountable. Subscribe for more exam-ready breakdowns, share this with a classmate or supervisee, and leave a review with the AI ethics question you want us to unpack next.

Want to know if you're ready for your Licensing Exam. Take our free exam today!

If you need to study for your national licensing exam, try the free samplers at: LicensureExams


This podcast is not associated with the NBCC, AMFTRB, ASW, ANCC, NASP, NAADAC, CCMC, NCPG, CRCC, or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.

Send us Fan Mail

Discharge is where a lot of plans quietly fail, not because clients “don’t care,” but because we underestimate how fast structure disappears and triggers return. We walk through aftercare planning the way we want you to think on a licensing exam and the way we want you to practice as a therapist: as a clinical process that starts early, stays collaborative, and keeps working after the final session.

We unpack a simple four-phase framework (assessment, goal setting, resource matching, and implementation with follow-up) and then zoom in on the stance that makes it work. We lean on motivational interviewing so clients buy into the plan instead of tolerating it, and we keep it strengths-based so aftercare feels achievable. We also talk harm reduction and systems thinking, because “meet the client where they are” is not a soft option, it’s the clinically appropriate one when real life includes family dynamics, housing instability, employers, and neighborhoods that can either support recovery or pull someone backward.

Then we get concrete and exam-ready: continuing care and recovery management checkups, Critical Time Intervention (CTI), Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), and the growing evidence for peer support. You’ll also hear practical tools you can use tomorrow, including relapse prevention planning, warning sign hierarchies with clear crisis steps like 988, support network mapping, behavioral rehearsal, warm handoffs, and the Stanley Brown Safety Plan. We close with the assessment instruments exam writers love: ASAM criteria, WHODAS 2.0, the Recovery Capital Scale, and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).

If you found this helpful, subscribe, share it with a classmate or consult group, and leave a quick review so more therapists can find the show. What aftercare question do you want us to tackle next?

Want to know if you're ready for your Licensing Exam. Take our free exam today!

If you need to study for your national licensing exam, try the free samplers at: LicensureExams


This podcast is not associated with the NBCC, AMFTRB, ASW, ANCC, NASP, NAADAC, CCMC, NCPG, CRCC, or any state or governmental agency responsible for licensure.