Owning What You Rent — Policy, Tax, and the Lightning Round
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Owning What You Rent — Policy, Tax, and the Lightning Round
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
A $100,000 investment can show $60,000 of paper losses in year one — a tax benefit ordinary renters never get access to. Sam Froerer tells Jerremy Alexander Newsome and Dave Conley that Trump-era policy restored 100% bonus depreciation after Biden had cut it to 40%. He argues the top 1% pulling away from everyone else is the same pattern behind every collapsed civilization in history. Asked what he'd do with $50 million to fix housing, Sam says he'd buy three more properties to prove his model works before pitching it to private equity and pension funds. In the lightning round, he says homeownership under 35 is, as of now, functionally over.
Timestamps:
- (00:14) A politician can't beat this – what would actually help residents more
- (00:40) A policy shift underway – reshaping who's allowed to own homes
- (01:36) $100K becomes $60K in losses – the tax trick investors use
- (03:33) The wealth gap's pattern – the same one behind every collapsed empire
- (05:40) $50 million, first move – what he'd do first to fix housing
- (07:55) Lightning round – is homeownership already dead under 35?
- (11:30) The identity shift – what could replace the homeownership dream
🌍 Connect with us: Instagram | YouTube | X | Web
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません