『OpenUSD's vs USDT, Bitget's 100M Users, Banks to Buy Fiserv Debit Network, Swift's Tokenized Ledger』のカバーアート

OpenUSD's vs USDT, Bitget's 100M Users, Banks to Buy Fiserv Debit Network, Swift's Tokenized Ledger

OpenUSD's vs USDT, Bitget's 100M Users, Banks to Buy Fiserv Debit Network, Swift's Tokenized Ledger

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

OpenUSD launched with 140 backers. Bitget Wallet crossed 100 million users. US banks are trying to buy their way around Durbin. And Swift just went live with a blockchain-based shared ledger for tokenized bank deposits. This episode covers all four.

Sam sat down with Alvin, COO of Bitget Wallet, to break down OpenUSD's consortium stablecoin model, why it shifts stablecoin yield from the reserve layer to the distribution layer, and what Bitget's 100 million user milestone actually measures. We also get into why Bitget is betting on emerging markets over the US and UK, how the wallet works without a banking license, and where AI agent payments are headed.

Then Otabek and Sam cover the week's biggest infrastructure news.

JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and PNC are reportedly in informal talks to acquire Star and Accel, the debit networks owned by Fiserv, whose stock has fallen sharply this year. The real motive is the Durbin Amendment, which caps debit interchange fees for large banks when transactions route over an outside network, but exempts banks that own the network itself. It is the same loophole logic behind Capital One's acquisition of Discover, and we discuss whether this leads to more merchant and consumer costs, and whether the payments world is fragmenting instead of consolidating around a few big rails.

We also break down Swift's new blockchain-based shared ledger, now ready for initial use after nine months of development. Seventeen banks across six continents, including ANZ, BNP Paribas, Citi, DBS, HSBC, Lloyds, MUFG, Standard Chartered, and UBS, are piloting live transactions using tokenized bank deposits instead of stablecoins. We get into how this differs structurally from USDT and USDC, why it overlaps with a separate live initiative from Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, and NatWest, whether Swift's 11,500-bank network gives it a structural edge over consortium stablecoins like OpenUSD, and why smaller emerging markets, including Central Asia, are still missing from every major cross-border rail being built right now.

Subscribe for weekly conversations on payments, stablecoins, and fintech infrastructure. Leave us five stars on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

TIMECODES:

00:00 Cold open

00:54 Bearish on trading, bullish on stablecoins

01:31 Open USD: 140 companies, one stablecoin

02:45 Cathie Wood's warning: can OUSD beat USDT and USDC?

03:40 The three layers: reserve, distribution, network

06:29 Governance: getting 140 rivals to agree

07:38 Trading vs payments — two different games

08:56 Inside Bitget Wallet: 100M users, cards and QR

11:47 Why emerging markets, and the "borderless generation"

13:03 $177B settled, and no banking licence

14:15 Can AI agents make payments?

16:48 Will the wallet become your bank account?

18:48 First time ever: payments overtake trading

21:19 Why not the US, UK and Europe?

23:00 News desk: Otabek is back

23:29 Story 1: Big banks want to own a debit network

27:14 The Durbin loophole and the Capital One precedent

29:28 Story 2: Is SWIFT a monopoly?

30:25 SWIFT's blockchain ledger: 17 banks, tokenized deposits

33:09 Fragmentation — is anyone actually coordinating?

34:42 The corridors nobody serves

37:25 Wrap: the ground is shifting

adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません