『More Complicated Than the Scopes Trial: A History of Evangelicals and Science (Episode 8)』のカバーアート

More Complicated Than the Scopes Trial: A History of Evangelicals and Science (Episode 8)

More Complicated Than the Scopes Trial: A History of Evangelicals and Science (Episode 8)

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る
When most people imagine evangelical Christianity and science in America, they picture conflict: the Scopes Trial, school-board fights over evolution, faith retreating before modern science. But that picture is largely a product of the twentieth century. For much of American history, evangelicals understood faith and scientific inquiry as deeply compatible — even mutually reinforcing.In this episode, hosts John Fea, Dan Hummel, and Maggie Capra trace that longer, more complicated story with historian Ted Davis of Messiah University, one of the leading scholars of science and religion in American Protestant history. Beginning with the seventeenth-century idea that God authored “two books” — Scripture and nature — the conversation follows the relationship between evangelical faith and science through the early Republic, the arrival of Darwinism, the culture wars of the 1920s, and into the complex evangelical landscape of today.Along the way, the hosts and Ted Davis explore why the “conflict” between evangelicals and science is both older and newer than we tend to assume — and why the real story resists the tidy narratives offered by both sides.BONUS: The Full Interview on YouTubeJohn Fea sat down with Ted Davis for an extended conversation that ranges well beyond what we could fit into this episode. Watch the complete interview on our YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/OHTG1yY-6bY KEY THEMESThe “Two Books” FrameworkFor more than two centuries, educated Christians assumed God had authored two books — Scripture and nature — and that reading either carefully was an act of worship. Drawing on Francis Bacon’s The Advancement of Learning (1605), evangelicals embraced the pursuit of knowledge as a moral obligation oriented toward charity and human benefit rather than power or self-aggrandizement.Progress, Postmillennialism, and the Antebellum FusionEarly American Protestants fused Enlightenment ideas of progress with a postmillennial confidence that the Kingdom of God was advancing through human effort. Scientific and technological advances were understood as part of a divine plan — an outlook that made faith and science natural partners well into the nineteenth century.The Rise of the “Conflict Thesis”The idea that science and religion have always been at war is itself a historical product, popularized after the Civil War by writers like John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White. Notably, these were liberal or modernist Protestants; the original conflict was less science-versus-faith than a struggle over which “book” would define Christianity.Defining “True Science”By the 1920s, fundamentalists were not anti-science by their own lights — they held a “common sense” view of science rooted in the Scottish Enlightenment, in which only what could be directly observed counted as fact. Evolution, unfolding too slowly to observe, was therefore dismissed as conjecture. The same logic shaped resistance to higher criticism of the Bible.Evolution, Germany, and World War IThe anti-evolution movement was politically entangled, not merely scientific. Evolution became linked in the American imagination with German militarism, a connection amplified by Vernon Kellogg’s Headquarters Nights (1917). For William Jennings Bryan, that link supplied a powerful political rationale for driving evolution out of public schools.Faith and Science After World War IIThe GI Bill, the neo-evangelical movement, and organizations like the American Scientific Affiliation opened space for devout Christians to pursue eminent scientific careers — Francis Collins, Ian Hutchinson, Katharine Hayhoe, and others. At the same time, a well-organized Young Earth Creationist subculture emerged, producing parallel institutions and a lasting polarization within the broader evangelical “tent.”PEOPLETed Davis — historian of science and religion, Messiah University; episode guestFrancis Bacon — 17th-century English philosopher; The Advancement of Learning (1605)Jonathan Edwards — colonial theologian; counter-Enlightenment strain of evangelical thoughtJohn Witherspoon — president of the College of New Jersey (Princeton); Scottish Enlightenment influenceSamuel Miller — New York City Presbyterian minister and early Princeton Seminary professorJames Ussher — 17th-century Church of Ireland bishop who calculated a creation date of 4004 BCJohn William Draper & Andrew Dickson White — popularizers of the “conflict thesis” after the Civil WarWilliam Jennings Bryan — populist politician, three-time presidential nominee, anti-evolution campaignerAsa Gray — Harvard botanist, Darwin’s first American champion, and a devout PresbyterianVernon Kellogg — Stanford biologist and pacifist; author of Headquarters Nights (1917)B. B. Warfield — conservative Calvinist theologian at Princeton Seminary who engaged evolutionFrancis Collins, Ian Hutchinson, Katharine Hayhoe, Joan Centrella — prominent ...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません