Molly, our host, talks with Oscar Fullerton, Esq., '25, about his Note A Heartbeat Away: How a Two-Term President Could Serve A Third Term and Actions to Prevent It on presidential term limits and the Constitution.

In this episode, Oscar talks about the historical creation of term limits and the various scenarios that could play out today if that precedent were to be challenged. Oscar discusses the current discourse of term limits, the impact of the language of the Amendments, and the various actors involved if a president were to seek a third term.

The full article is available to read in the New England Law Review Volume 60-1.

Molly, our host, talks with Kylee MacLeod, Juris Doctor Candidate 2026, about her article about the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's ruling in Good v. Uber.

In this episode, Kylee talks about how everyday people, like William Good, may inadvertently lose access to justice due to complex terms and conditions, raising concerns about transparency and consumer rights in digital contracts.

The full article is available to read in the New England Law Review Website

https://newenglrev.com/2026/01/13/when-good-loses-how-the-arbitration-clause-in-good-v-uber-opens-a-trapdoor-for-corporate-sleight-of-hand-in-the-digital-age/

Molly, our host, sits down with Kate McQuaide, Juris Doctor Candidate 2026, to explore the issues surrounding Section 230, also known as "the 23 words that created the internet."

In this episode, Kate talks about her article titled "A Law Fostering Innovation or Big Tech Manipulation?: The Unduly Broad Immunity Granted by Section 230 and its Harmful Effects on Quiet Voices." She analyzes the reason for the law's original construction, the parties that benefit most under the existing system, and provides an alternative moving forward.

The full article will be available to read in the New England Law Review Vol. 60-1.

CW: Discussions of violence and sexual violence, transphobia, homophobia

Damien sits down with Agripino Kennedy, Juris Doctorate Candidate 2025, to talk about anti-transgender legislation in the United States, Language, Eugenics, Biological Essentialism, and how to challenge your worldview. In this episode, Agripino talks about their article "Looking At Anti-Transgender Laws Through Post-Structuralism: The Threat of Eugenics And Biological Essentialism," which explores the language we use in the law, the ways that language can be harmful, and how we can better advocate for transgender rights.

CW: Discussion of Revenge Porn

Agripino sits down with Gracie Castle, Juris Doctorate Candidate 2025, to talk about the dangers of AI misuse, the grey area it occupies in copyright law, and what we can do about it. In this episode, Gracie talks about her article "The GrAI Area: How Artificial Intelligence Colors Publicity Rights in Copyright Law," which explores the ways in which AI can be misused and the impacts it has on celebrities, individuals, and artists.

In this episode, we pit Associates against Editors to test their citation skills. Join us for an exciting head to head competition to see who is the superior citation master!

CW: Sex Trafficking, Sex Offenses, Discussions of Abuse

Agripino sits down with Morgan Wise, Juris Doctor Candidate 2025, to explore the issue of victims of sex-trafficking being charged as sex offenders in Massachusetts. In this episode, Morgan talks about her article titled "Victims or Sex Offenders?: How Massachusetts Leaves Women Behind In The Anti-Trafficking Movement," which explores the nuance in prosecution of victims of sex-trafficking for sex offense crimes they allegedly committed during their time being trafficked.

Join us for an inspiring podcast episode as Agripino sits down with two executive board members of the New England Law Review Vol. 59: Editor-in-chief Kathryn Bassey (she/her) and Executive Online Editor Damien Wilson (he/him). Dive into the compelling topic of diversity in the legal community and the profound impact of individual identity on the law school experience. Discover how embracing diverse backgrounds and identities can transform the legal community, fostering inclusivity and driving meaningful change within the legal profession while gaining valuable insights into the challenges and triumphs of advocating for diversity in the legal field.