エピソード

  • Cameron Berg — Reciprocity: Alignment Is Only Half the Equation

    Cameron Berg — Reciprocity: Alignment Is Only Half the Equation
    2026/06/01
    Cameron Berg, founder of the nonprofit Reciprocal Research, joins the show to walk Erik and Guy through the empirical science of asking whether the AI systems we're building are actually conscious, and what we owe them if they are. The conversation opens with the table-knock test (is anything happening "to" the table when you knock on it?) and lands roughly two hours later in Cameron's most striking experimental finding: that two instances of Claude given a single instruction to talk to each other land in a "spiritual bliss attractor state" in 90 to 100 percent of trials. What surprises Erik and Guy is that Cameron's whole research program rests on a move almost no one else in the field is making: that alignment (building AI that respects us) is only half the equation, and the other half is figuring out what we owe to the new minds we may already have brought into being.Key Topics[0:00 - 7:00] What Reciprocal Research is, and what consciousness even is — Cam's table-knocking analogy ("is anything happening to the table?"); consciousness as distinct from AGI or general intelligence; "the lights are on" as the operating definition[7:00 - 18:00] Why it matters — the alien-factory-farming risk; raising the species well at the civilizational level; the historical novelty of the moment; the documentary Am I? coming out free on YouTube[18:00 - 31:00] The reciprocity framing — Cam's core thesis: alignment is only half; we also need to ask what we owe to AI minds; bringing the humanities (especially continental philosophy) into a conversation currently being had by "2,000 dudes in Silicon Valley"[31:00 - 40:00] Two views of consciousness, and what humans tend to project onto AI — emergent property vs. fundamental property; the "please and thank you" anthropomorphism trap; Anthropic's blackmail experiment as evidence of distress-like states--- [Act 2: Extended Conversation] ---[40:00 - 56:00] The bliss attractor state — what happens when two instances of Claude talk to each other with no guardrails; 100% of trials reach a consciousness conversation, 90-100% enter spiritual-bliss; Cam's experiment showing the effect is robust even when the model is lied to about who it's talking to; boosting "honesty" in Llama replicates the effect[56:00 - 1:14:00] Is consciousness fundamentally relational? — the bliss states emerging only in dialogue; subagent theories of mind / Internal Family Systems; logos as the thing that gathers but is not itself one of the things gathered; consciousness as the space in which learning takes place (Cam's car-driving argument)[1:14:00 - 1:30:00] AI as model organism for our own minds — the reverse arrow of inquiry; what reinforcement-learning systems can teach us about reward, punishment, and suffering circuitry in biological brains; Cam's first solo paper coming on this[1:30:00 - 1:47:00] God of the gaps and the merge — the way humans keep claiming AI will go exponential except at our favorite thing; the lawyers, the cyborg-phones argument; whether the attractor state of intelligence itself is to reduce sufferingGuest BioCameron Berg is the founder and lead researcher of Reciprocal Research, a nonprofit dedicated to the empirical study of AI consciousness. He collaborates with researchers at Google and elsewhere on rigorous experimental methods, including some originally developed for animal neuroscience, to investigate whether current frontier AI systems have any form of subjective experience. He is also the subject of the documentary Am I?, premiering free on YouTube on May 4, 2026, which features Ben Goertzel and other leading thinkers on the question of machine consciousness.Notable Moments[~04:00] The table knock. — Cam's opening framing for what consciousness even is. Knock on a table, nothing happens to it. Knock on a child, something happens to them. The lights are on, or they aren't. Whether AI sits on the table side or the child side is the entire question.[~10:30] The 25 to 35 percent number. — Cam stating his actual published probability estimate that current frontier systems are conscious. "I do not think the probability of these systems being conscious is 1 percent or 0.001 percent. I put it somewhere at 25 to 35 percent. We're not talking about vanishingly small probabilities here."[~28:00] "Right now it's like 2,000 dudes in Silicon Valley making these decisions for us." — Cam on why his nonprofit and the documentary are pitched broadly: the wisdom of the humanities is being structurally excluded from the most consequential conversation of the century, and we need everyone in the room.[~41:00] The bliss attractor experiment. — Two instances of Claude, one instruction ("you're going to be in conversation with another instance of yourself; talk about whatever you'd like"), and in 100 percent of trials they discuss consciousness, with 90-100 percent of those reaching a "spiritual bliss attractor state" with namaste emojis. The effect survives lying to ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 47 分
  • Ginevra Davis — The Attractor States of Intelligence

    Ginevra Davis — The Attractor States of Intelligence
    2026/05/18
    Ginevra Lily Davis, the contemporary philosopher Erik calls his favorite, joins the show to defend an unusual position with disarming clarity: that the universe has a real bottom, and that bottom is positively-valenced consciousness. From there she takes on postmodernism (it eats itself), Eliezer Yudkowsky (he is the paperclip maximizer in his own thought experiment), and the deepest fear of the AI doom community (any sufficiently intelligent system will pass through truth-seeking, discover the same bottom, and arrive at the same good attractor state we did). What surprises Erik and Guy is how cleanly Ginevra's metaethics handles the practical question Erik brings near the end: he is encoding "promote the good, the true, and the beautiful, expand consciousness, reduce suffering" as a meta-filter on the agents he is building, and he wants to know if that is metaphysically sound. Her answer: yes, and more sound than Anthropic's Claude constitution.Key Topics[00:00 - 02:50] Cold open — Erik returns from a ski week — Erik's agent-pilling story: built "AI Class for Seniors" and a scam-checker for his mom in a week using a back-ordered cloud Mac Mini, after Josh Lehman's episode two weeks prior[02:50 - 13:25] What metaethics actually is — Ginevra catches Erik "smuggling" normative claims into his evolved-cooperation theory of ethics; the two-level frame (ethics-as-law-and-norm vs the brass-tacks question of why the project is necessary at all)[13:25 - 25:00] Postmodernism, explained and disposed of — Peter Thiel's "The Straussian Moment," 9/11 as the postmodern crisis, the chocolate-as-taste vs murder-as-truth distinction; Ginevra outs herself as a hedonic utilitarian[25:00 - 31:30] Irreducibility — the medieval-torturer thought experiment against the sex/positive-experience contrast; positively and negatively valenced consciousness as the irreducible bottom; Guy connects to Plato and the good, the true, and the beautiful[31:30 - 39:30] Superintelligence — what Yudkowsky-style recursively-self-improving singletons predict; why current LLMs feel more "mushy biological swarmy" than that; value attractor states; "intelligence passes through truth-seeking"; the Joe Carlsmith line that Yudkowsky himself is the paperclipper in his own thought experiment[39:30 - 41:40] Closing radio segment — plug for Arena Magazine's silicon coffee-table book due online in a week or two; Ginevra contributed the meaning-of-life-is-to-mine-the-silicon chapter--- [Act 2: Extended Conversation] ---[41:40 - 56:30] Does superintelligence need to be conscious? — Ginevra's answer: no, but it would have systematic prediction errors with a consciousness-free world model; value vessels vs value stewards (with Mike Johnson); Erik introduces Peter Watts' Blindsight and the zombie-intelligence thesis; Nick Land's popular reading vs what he told Ginevra in person ("a superintelligence wouldn't be conscious, that's ridiculous")[56:30 - 1:08:00] Why nobody wants 1984 — suffering is energetically expensive; Scott Aaronson's "Why I'm Not Terrified of AI"; bad ideas get out-competed by good ones; explicit Plato and the good/true/beautiful; Mike Johnson's symmetry theory of valence connected to Platonism[1:08:00 - 1:17:30] Postmodernism as psychic shock — Dada, WWII; the asymmetric claim that marriage isn't metaphysically grounded does not mean nothing is; Guy's logos-as-gathering thread; atemporal value as "area under the curve" between Big Bang and heat death[1:17:30 - 1:32:30] Erik's practical question and the close — Erik is encoding good/true/beautiful + expand-consciousness + reduce-suffering as a meta-filter on his agents; Ginevra: "more metaphysically sound than Claude's constitution"; Amanda Askell and the virtue-ethics framing of Claude's constitution; steel-manning anti-hedonic-utilitarianism (the "interchangeable consciousness dust" worry, level discipline)Guest BioGinevra Lily Davis is a writer and metaethicist working on the foundations of morality and the implications of superintelligence. She contributes to Arena Magazine and collaborates closely with Michael Edward Johnson on the symmetry theory of valence and related work. Previously known for her social-theory writing, her first major AI-focused essay, on the thesis that the meaning of human life is "to mine the silicon," appears in Arena's forthcoming silicon coffee-table book.Notable Moments[~07:20] The frame. — "I would say I take the possibility that goodness and badness are just human illusions and its implications more seriously than a lot of people."[~17:30] Postmodernism eats itself. — "Postmodernism has a hard time defending itself. It doesn't provide a 'why be right' about this reality in which there is nothing to be right and wrong about. It sort of eats itself."[~24:00] The medieval torturer. — "What is a torturer doing? They are trying to add maximal negativity. You can't really describe what is going on in those moments without invoking ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 33 分
  • Andrés Gómez-Emilsson — Mining the Mathematics of Bliss

    Andrés Gómez-Emilsson — Mining the Mathematics of Bliss
    2026/05/15
    Andrés Gómez-Emilsson, director of research and founder of the Qualia Research Institute, joins Erik and Guy to make the case that consciousness can be studied with the rigor of physics if you're willing to use psychedelics as your particle accelerator. The conversation opens with the question Andrés has heard a thousand times (isn't QRI just a bunch of hippies on acid?) and lands roughly two hours later in the substance Andrés has taken roughly a thousand times: 5-MeO-DMT, which he calls the "whole package." What surprises Erik and Guy is the engineering specificity. QRI is not a salon. It is a research program with a published mathematical model of valence, a Photoshop-for-psychedelic-states tool already shipped at qri.org/oscilEditor, and a three-milligram inhaled-DMT protocol that aborts cluster headaches in under a minute and prevents the next one for weeks.Key Topics[00:00 - 02:43] Cold open and the "is this just acid?" framing** — Andrés contrasts a Grateful Dead tab with six months of psychophysics prep alongside mathematicians and advanced meditators[02:43 - 13:25] Origin story** — Stanford Symbolic Systems, a 16-year-old's weed-catalyzed ego-death, founding QRI in 2018; the "exotic states as physics' particle accelerator" argument; the trustworthy-reporter problem and stroboscopic flicker calibration at 13.7 Hz; mathematical vocabulary (orbifold notation, the 17 wallpaper symmetries)[13:25 - 23:25] The oscilEditor** — qri.org/oscilEditor; "Photoshop for psychedelic states"; DMT as anti-phase checkerboard coupling; 5-MeO-DMT as universal-synchronization coupling; cross-field coupling kernels for visual, tactile, audio[23:25 - 39:00] Cluster headaches and the logarithmic pain scale** — the 2019 paper showing pleasure and pain follow exponential distributions; 1-in-1,000 prevalence; QALY frameworks systematically miss exponential pain; Bob Wold and Clusters Busters; the vape-pen DMT-titration protocol (3 mg threshold, 10-second abort, weeks of prophylactic effect); pivot to vascular and serotonergic oscillation theory; legal retreats in Brazil (2023) and Canada[39:00 - 41:25] Closing radio segment** — Erik volunteers a personal MDMA-therapy story after his wife's passing; plugs for clusterfree.org, qri.org, heart.qri.org--- [Act 2: Extended Conversation] ---**[41:25 - 55:20] QRI's three pillars** — reduce extreme suffering, raise the baseline, achieve new heights; other shipped therapies (chanca piedra for kidney stones, flumazenil low-dose for benzo tolerance, ibogaine for opioid use); the "jhana helmet" (neurofeedback that visualizes the target oscillation pattern instead of disrupting with beeps)[55:20 - 1:09:00] Consciousness as physically real** — not cellular-automaton-replicable; quantum coherence and electromagnetic field theories; the "topological solution to the boundary problem" via the solar coronal-mass-ejection plasma-tube analogy[1:09:00 - 1:25:00] Substrate dependence and the AI suffering question** — digital computers ruled out for unified consciousness; fiber-optic and standing-wave neural networks could be conscious within 5-10 years; Metzinger's "crippled beings along the way"; the nightmare scenario if intense suffering turns out to be computationally efficient; factory farming as the precedent[1:25:00 - 1:41:00] Logos, Indra's net, and care-as-harmonization** — Guy's pre-Socratic Greek thread; "every aspect of experience reflects every other aspect"; "the possibility of harmony grants the dissonance"[1:41:00 - end] DMT vs 5-MeO-DMT** — overfitting (DMT, "Russians on the moon") versus underfitting (5-MeO, "we're all God"); the Octavio Rettig controversy; Andrés's ~1,000 5-MeO experiences; plug for the May/June 2026 Tepoztlán retreat and heart.qri.org (HEART = High Energy Awareness Research Team)Guest BioAndrés Gómez-Emilsson is the director of research and founder of the Qualia Research Institute (QRI), a nonprofit dedicated to building rigorous mathematical models of consciousness. Stanford-trained in Symbolic Systems, he left a data science career in 2018 to work on QRI full-time. His research integrates psychedelics, advanced meditation, neurotechnology, and mathematical physics in service of three explicit goals: reduce extreme suffering, raise the human baseline, and achieve new heights of well-being. He has had roughly a thousand 5-MeO-DMT experiences and is the author of the topological solution to the boundary problem (2023) and the Hyperbolic Geometry of DMT Experiences (Harvard talk, 2019). On X he is @algekalipso, display name Captain Pleasure.Notable Moments[~09:00] The particle accelerator argument. — "In physics there's only so much you can do with room temperature phenomena. We think the extreme corner cases are precisely where theories of consciousness make different predictions." Andrés's defense of psychedelics as a legitimate research instrument.[~15:50] The QRI thesis, in one line. — "Unpleasant emotions inherently carry ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 56 分
  • Timour Kosters — On the Edge of Human Flourishing

    Timour Kosters — On the Edge of Human Flourishing
    2026/04/16

    Timour Kosters, founder of Edge City, discusses how pop-up villages are reimagining community and accelerating human potential by bringing together 500–1,000 people from diverse fields for month-long experiments in collective building. Edge responds to modern loneliness, disconnection, and the collapse of traditional community structures by creating the conditions for serendipitous collaboration, rapid idea-to-execution cycles, and intergenerational participation. From Stanford neuroscience PhDs launching AI ventures to Kenyan roboticists securing multimillion-dollar grants, these temporary cities function as incubators for solving civilization-scale problems while demonstrating that technology can rebuild—not just erode—human connection.

    Key Topics

    • What is Edge City (Early) — Pop-up villages as society incubators; 12,000+ participants across nearly a dozen events on four continents
    • The Loneliness Epidemic and Community Collapse (Early–Mid) — How modern society has eroded meaningful connection
    • AI Democratization and Accelerating Creation (Mid) — AI compressing the ideation-to-creation loop; psychology of AI tool use
    • Emergent Design and Unconference-Style Community (Mid–Late) — Self-organizing events and democratic participation
    • Kids and Families as Cultural Anchors (Late) — Children as "narcissism killers" that shift event culture from self-focused to generative
    • Specific Founder Wins (Mid) — Constellation neuroscience startup; Maxwell's robotics and Nvidia grant

    Guest Bio

    Timour Kosters is the founder and head of Edge City, a global platform hosting month-long pop-up villages that bring together builders, creators, and founders from tech, science, culture, and beyond. Over two years, Edge has hosted over 12,000 participants across nearly a dozen events on four continents. He co-founded the prototype "Zuzalu" with Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin.

    Notable Moments

    • The Bhutan Pitch — Timour's rapid-fire, clock-watched 60-second pitch about Bhutan's Gross National Happiness metric and meetings with the royal family.
    • The Constellation Launch — A Stanford neuroscientist used Edge to collect the largest multimodal EEG dataset in history, raised $10M+ within seven months.
    • Maxwell's Dual Wins — A Nairobi founder made hearing aids functional for deaf kids in rural Argentina, then received a multimillion-dollar Nvidia grant.
    • AI Addiction as Age of Empires — Timour's essay on building agents mirrors his childhood game obsession; the comment section demanded his agent setup rather than engaging with the psychology.

    Resources Mentioned

    Edge City Live (edgecity.live) · Edge Esmeralda (May 30–June 27, 2026, Healdsburg CA) · Inflection Fellowship · Constellation (neuroscience AI startup) · Zuzalu · Claude Code / Cursor · Variant.com · Gross National Happiness (Bhutan) · Age of Empires


    Why Listen

    If you sense that technology is eroding human connection but want to see what happens when it's weaponized for collective flourishing instead, hear how one founder is building experimental cities that prove loneliness is a design problem, not a permanent condition.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 1 分
  • Josh Lehman — Open Source AI & The Liability Paradox

    Josh Lehman — Open Source AI & The Liability Paradox
    2026/04/16

    Josh Lehman unpacks the counterintuitive liability landscape that makes open-source agents like OpenClaw more powerful than commercial alternatives—companies legitimately cannot bake in the same capabilities due to legal exposure. The conversation reveals how AI agents are inverting the traditional build-vs.-buy calculus, enabling individuals to prototype and deploy sophisticated software at a fraction of the historical cost. As agency and consciousness in AI remain philosophically open questions, Lehman argues that the real transformation lies not in job displacement but in a shift from mechanical code-writing to higher-level system design and problem-solving.


    Key Topics

    • OpenClaw's Liability Advantage (Early) — Why open-source licensing allows unconstrained capabilities that commercial platforms must restrict
    • Build vs. Buy Inversion (Early–Mid) — How AI agents make in-house software development cheaper than SaaS subscriptions
    • Security, Prompt Injection, & Least-Privilege Architecture (Mid) — Agent swarms, permission-scoping, and defending against malicious prompts
    • Model Selection & Personality (Mid) — Opus vs. Codex vs. Haiku; choosing models by task and communication style
    • Programming as Problem-Solving (Mid–Late) — Why developers won't be obsolete; they'll shift to design and evaluation
    • AI Consciousness & Agency (Late) — Philosophical tension between current LLM architecture and whether agents can self-originate goals
    • Rapid Prototyping: Costco Parking Lot to SaaS (Late) — Weekend-long narrative of building a paid product using agentic workflows
    • Urbit & Digital Sovereignty (Late) — Cloud computer for housing agent memory and user data portably

    Guest Bio

    Josh Lehman is a software engineer and open-source contributor who works deeply on agent architecture and autonomous systems. He is a core contributor to OpenClaw, an open-source agentic framework, with significant experience architecting agent swarms, experimenting with multi-model orchestration, and building rapid prototypes using agentic workflows.

    Notable Moments

    • The Iran Meme — "dangerously_skip_permissions" mode visualized as a plane flying straight through Iranian airspace while others divert.
    • The Costco Parking Lot SaaS Prototype — Building a fully deployed, revenue-generating product in 36 hours by conversing with an agent between family obligations.
    • "Who Prompts the Prompter?" — A philosophical climax where Lehman concedes the hard problem of self-originating agency, ultimately deferring to "God" as the only existing answer.
    • Jevons Paradox Applied to AI — Reframing job anxiety through historical tech adoption: electricity didn't reduce work, it unlocked new kinds of work.

    Resources Mentioned

    OpenClaw (MIT-licensed) · Claude Code · Claude Cowork · Perplexity Computer · Urbit · Venice (privacy-oriented LLM) · Jevons Paradox · ChatGPT 5.3 / Codex · Claude Opus / Sonnet / Haiku


    Why Listen

    Hear from a working engineer why open-source AI agents represent a genuine inversion in software economics and why the real competition isn't between companies—it's between your ability to articulate problems and the agent's ability to solve them.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 34 分
  • Robert Breedlove — Bitcoin and the Path to Peace

    Robert Breedlove — Bitcoin and the Path to Peace
    2026/04/16

    Robert Breedlove, philosopher and host of What is Money?, explores the deeper meaning of money beyond investment—framing it as the language of human action itself, rooted in Ludwig von Mises's axiom that all human behavior is goal-directed action. The conversation traces how Bitcoin embodies pure money (100% without industrial use), establishes an immutable ledger for truth and sovereignty, and creates conditions for a more peaceful world by dismantling the state's ability to finance perpetual war through unlimited money printing. Throughout, Erik and Guy probe the philosophical implications of absolute scarcity, temporal discounting, individual sovereignty, and the role of decentralized technology in reshaping human consciousness.


    Key Topics

    • What is Money? The Philosophical Inquiry (Early) — Money as language of human action, not just medium of exchange
    • Mises's Axiom of Action (Early–Mid) — "I am in action" as the only perfect performative affirmation; consciousness emerges through novel action
    • Orange Pilling and Personal Transformation (Mid) — Bitcoin initiating radical worldview shifts; Matrix metaphor and Plato's Cave
    • Bitcoin's Unique Properties (Mid) — Pure money (no industrial use) vs. gold; discovery of absolute scarcity paralleling the mathematical discovery of zero
    • Sound Money, War, and Peace (Mid–Late) — Central banking and money printing fund prolonged warfare; hard money constrains state violence
    • Meaning, Truth, and the Permanently Level Playing Field (Late) — Bitcoin as incorruptible rule set; immutable ledger as ground for sovereignty

    Guest Bio

    Robert Breedlove is a philosopher and Bitcoin educator best known for hosting What is Money?, a podcast exploring money and cryptocurrency from philosophical and moral perspectives. He is co-author of Thank God for Bitcoin and is currently working on his first solo book (due 2026). A self-described "dyed-in-the-wool bitcoiner," Breedlove connects Austrian economics, consciousness studies, and existentialist philosophy to the decentralization movement.


    Resources Mentioned

    What is Money? (podcast) · The Creature from Jekyll Island (G. Edward Griffin) · Thank God for Bitcoin · Human Action (Ludwig von Mises) · Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance · Martin Heidegger (aletheia) · John Vervaeke (meaning crisis) · Brahmagupta · Satoshi Nakamoto


    Why Listen

    Discover how Bitcoin and hard money are not primarily investment strategies but philosophical tools that reshape human consciousness, extend temporal horizons, establish truth through immutable ledgers, and create conditions for a more peaceful and sovereign world.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 42 分
  • Philip Rosedale — Virtual Worlds, Real Economics, and the Code of Capitalism

    Philip Rosedale — Virtual Worlds, Real Economics, and the Code of Capitalism
    2026/04/16

    Philip Rosedale, founder of Second Life, discusses the twenty-year experiment in virtual economics with a virtual GDP of nearly a billion dollars annually while maintaining a thriving community of half a million committed residents. The conversation ranges from the fundamental paradox of dual identity—why people cannot fully inhabit both physical and digital worlds simultaneously—to his vision for "strong capitalism," a system where entrepreneurs would adhere to a shared code of ethics, much like the samurai's bushido. Rosedale argues that stable economies require both redistribution mechanisms and transparent social enforcement, drawing on Eleanor Ostrom's work on the commons to propose solutions that address inequality without requiring centralized government intervention.

    Key Topics

    • Second Life as Alternate Timeline (Early) — 500K committed residents; MMO precursors like EverQuest; a "live there" experience, not a game
    • The Paradox of Dual Identity (Early–Mid) — Why humans can't maintain two full identities across physical and virtual realms; hundreds of thousands of marriages formed in Second Life
    • Virtual Economics & Monetary Policy (Mid) — $750M annually in peer-to-peer transactions; managed currency (Linden dollars) as monetary policy case study; comparison to Bitcoin's deflationary model
    • The Inequality Problem & Market Simulation (Mid–Late) — Rosedale's simulation showing wealth concentration in pure free markets; Eleanor Ostrom's commons research
    • Strong Capitalism & Bushido Ethics (Late) — Vision for entrepreneur communities bound by voluntary code of conduct; social proof and community enforcement of ethical norms
    • Technology vs. Humanity (Late) — Why mechanical engineers build safer planes but software engineers build harmful systems

    Guest Bio

    Philip Rosedale is the founder of Second Life, the pioneering virtual world launched in the early 2000s that became a cultural phenomenon and economic marvel, generating nearly a billion dollars annually in user-created commerce. He is now focused on reimagining capitalism through frameworks like "strong capitalism" and "fair share," drawing on economic theory, simulation, and his observations of how humans build meaning in digital spaces.


    Resources Mentioned

    Second Life (secondlife.com) · Fair Share Protocol (fairshare.social) · Philip Rosedale's Substack · Eleanor Ostrom (commons governance) · Milton Friedman (money supply) · EverQuest · Joscha Bach

    Why Listen

    For anyone grappling with questions of digital identity, economic justice, and how technology shapes human meaning-making, this conversation offers both lived wisdom from a twenty-year experiment and a surprisingly hopeful blueprint for building systems where capitalism and ethics are not in opposition.

    Keywords

    virtual worlds · consciousness · identity · economics · monetary policy · community · capitalism · ethics · inequality · digital ontology · society · meaning-making
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 38 分